Page 34 | Harry but not Meghan

lipstickwoman · 2023-04-12T14:26:12+00:00

No surprise he's coming on his own to the coronation.

beguilingeyes · 14/04/2023 06:07

purpledalmation · 13/04/2023 21:31

It doesn't matter that cannabis is legal in california, it's illegal under federal law and federal law is what governs visa applications. He's admitted having a quiet spliff or two and admitted significant drug use in his life in his book. There won't be repercussions of course, he is after all a privileged Prince.

Oh, come on..it's not because he's a prince, it's because he's famous. They let Keith Richards and Elton John (and every rock star ever) in and they've done a lot worse than the odd spliff.

Whaeanui · 14/04/2023 06:14

Least the palace didn’t grubbily ask for money for the revelation

Oh but actually it is how it works. The deal with the press helps keep them in everyone’s minds and that is what keeps the lifestyle they’ve got, the monarchy itself relies on being relevant and mildly popular. The press won’t give them that platform without leaks.

Whaeanui · 14/04/2023 06:16

It doesn't matter that cannabis is legal in california, it's illegal under federal law and federal law is what governs visa applications.

This is so nonsensical. Anyone who lives in California that smokes cannabis does so legally. Including people there on visas, of which there are many famous or known people doing so and sharing it openly. You do not have a visa denied or revoked because you did something legal in the state you live. Ludicrous suggestion and fanciful thinking.

Whaeanui · 14/04/2023 06:18

Also, KP lied saying that one of her staff members left because she moved to another country when it fact she was one of the employees that accused her of bullying

Do you have evidence of this? Where did you get it from?

Roussette · 14/04/2023 07:10

Littleroseseverywhere · 14/04/2023 03:52

Meh, if you think that’s a disgusting leak you should have a read of Harry’s book spare. Least the palace didn’t grubbily ask for money for the revelation 😂

and to be honest, I think it was fairly obvious to everyone rhe delay was fhey were negotiating position, even their mouth piece omid scobie said they wanted to be on the balcony, have Archie mentioned etc When they didn’t get the position they wanted then it became a quick duty visit for harry. So of course where they sat and who next to was going to be part of it, it’s hardly a shocking and surprising revelation.

Show quote history

So you have no comment on the fact that the palace leak this sort of thing?

All fair game because it's Harry and Meghan.and just a chance for you to rant about the book whilst ignoring what I posted. have read the book. Have you?

skullbabe · 14/04/2023 07:21

Littleroseseverywhere · 14/04/2023 03:52

Meh, if you think that’s a disgusting leak you should have a read of Harry’s book spare. Least the palace didn’t grubbily ask for money for the revelation 😂

and to be honest, I think it was fairly obvious to everyone rhe delay was fhey were negotiating position, even their mouth piece omid scobie said they wanted to be on the balcony, have Archie mentioned etc When they didn’t get the position they wanted then it became a quick duty visit for harry. So of course where they sat and who next to was going to be part of it, it’s hardly a shocking and surprising revelation.

Show quote history

I think you’ll find that it’s Ingrid Seward who speculated this not Omid Scobie.

Whaeanui · 14/04/2023 07:39

even their mouth piece omid scobie said they wanted to be on the balcony

It’s this kind of lie being repeated on threads where it’s already been corrected that lead to us commenting multiple times about it and then being called ‘obsessed’ and ‘bots’. If you keep repeating misinformation then you’ll keep getting comments about it.

skullbabe · 14/04/2023 07:47

Meh, if you think that’s a disgusting leak you should have a read of Harry’s book spare.

Also suspect the poster has not actually read Spare based on this comment.

Littleroseseverywhere · 14/04/2023 07:51

“Lie” 😂 who cares who claimed it.

and no I honestly can’t give a shit about a leak on there was a discussion on seating arrangements, of all things. Hardly equivalent to my brother shoved me and broke my necklace is it.

Inkanta · 14/04/2023 07:53

Roussette · 14/04/2023 02:42

If that is true ,(doubtful, it being the DM) that's a disgusting leak by the Palace. It can ONLY have come from them. If true, why do they have to do this and have this sort of detail picked over by the public?
If untrue, the DM should be ashamed at making up such rubbish

Show quote history

Yes I thought that. If it's another of those palace leaks of a private conversation it really is poor form of the palace. Not an ethical or civilised way to carry on in this day and age.

Whaeanui · 14/04/2023 07:53

who cares who claimed it.

You gave validity to it because of who said it. Of course who said it matters, taboood journalists aren’t credible sources of what Harry wants, he’s suing all of them

Whaeanui · 14/04/2023 07:54

Hardly equivalent to my brother shoved me and broke my necklace is it.

Once again, this story was already published, Harry gave his version

Roussette · 14/04/2023 07:55

skullbabe · 14/04/2023 07:21

I think you’ll find that it’s Ingrid Seward who speculated this not Omid Scobie.

Show quote history

A complete load of BS then. Ingrid Seward is one of the 'Royal Reporters' who (along with 3 others) managed to comment in a derogatory way on the OW interview before they'd even seen it! Embarrassing and makes it up as she goes along as she proved on that day.

Roussette · 14/04/2023 07:56

Inkanta · 14/04/2023 07:53

Yes I thought that. If it's another of those palace leaks of a private conversation it really is poor form of the palace. Not an ethical or civilised way to carry on in this day and age.

Show quote history

They just keep doing it don't they.

And lets be fair to the Palace, if it wasn't leaked by them, we now know the DM made it up for clickbait. Either way is very bad.

rellies · 14/04/2023 08:01

Meghan isn't coming to the coronation because it isn't about her.

Serenster · 14/04/2023 08:02

Roussette · 14/04/2023 02:47

@,Nono22972

Meghan only worked 72 days as a royal and the palace released 20 statement denying stories in the press

Really? I remember one statement by Harry asking the Press to lay off, something by William agreeing and that's it. 20 statements put out by the Palace defending Meghan?

Here’s some examples, Roussette. It’s not a comprehensive list. And the Palace denied things that were true, too.

Roussette · 14/04/2023 08:04

rellies · 14/04/2023 08:01

Meghan isn't coming to the coronation because it isn't about her.

I think we know it isn't about her, she isn't about to be crowned!

Weird comment from you. The Queen's funeral wasn't about her, she was there for that. The Queen's platinum Jubilee service wasn't about her either - she was there for that.

Whaeanui · 14/04/2023 08:05

It’s quite hard to read all the detail behind the headlines, one of them at least, says ‘sources’ so not based on a statement. A couple are denying commercial interests. Which is standard.

Roussette · 14/04/2023 08:07

Gosh, Serenster you've been busy! I will admit it's a bit hard to see, but well done. From what I can actually see as it's a bit fuzzy, good they did this sort of thing. It was needed. And more.

Whaeanui · 14/04/2023 08:08

It was needed with racist headlines and fake wedding stories

50shadesofneigh · 14/04/2023 08:13

A source saying that the Sussexes are (shallowly) obsessed with seating plans is not the same thing as publishing a 400-page tome of intimate, private life details, designed to humiliate and hurt members of his family, for the coin.

Saying that, it is a rather revealing detail! (and funny) The Sussexes wanted to stage-manage the show, but weren't allowed to.

Whaeanui · 14/04/2023 08:14

is not the same thing as publishing a 400-page tome of intimate, private life details, designed to humiliate and hurt members of his family, for the coin.

Hundreds of leaks and thousands of stories over years and years, many of which make the basis for books, is the same

50shadesofneigh · 14/04/2023 08:18

Whaeanui · 14/04/2023 08:14

is not the same thing as publishing a 400-page tome of intimate, private life details, designed to humiliate and hurt members of his family, for the coin.

Hundreds of leaks and thousands of stories over years and years, many of which make the basis for books, is the same

Well, we will never agree on that, but since you are accepting that the seating plan thing is authentic, if it's coming from the palace - what's your take on that for sussex PR?

SirChenjins · 14/04/2023 08:19

No it’s not the same - unless someone puts their actual name to a story as Harry (and others in the RF) have done then it’s conjecture, rumours and gossip.

SirChenjins · 14/04/2023 08:21

What’s happening with the seating plan btw?!