Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
The royal family
Original poster

Harry and Meghan still not replied to Coronation Invitation

491 replies

Viviennemary · 06/04/2023 11:09

Harry and Meghan still haven't replied to the invitation to the coronation even though the RSPV deadline has passed. If it's true I think it's a bit rude. They know the preparation that goes into these events. It must be a headache for the planners not to know if they are coming or not.

Apparently Arche and Lilibet aren't invited to the actual ceremony as they are deemed to be too young. My bet is they will all come to the UK for the coronation but who knows. Not heard if Andrew is coming or not. And Fergie. Will she be there. Maybe behind a pillar.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Whenharrymetsmelly · 07/04/2023 08:25

I do find the bit about Archie's birthday amusing, like a normal person would use that as a reason not to be part of such a historical occasion. Oh sorry Dad, I can't come to your coronation, we're having a few kids over that day Hmm

Phoebo · 07/04/2023 08:29

Viviennemary · 06/04/2023 21:57

I think it does matter if they are there or not. We are still seeeing photos of the Queens coronation and that was seventy years ago. And king George VI and thats even longer ago. It does matter who is there IMHO. In 70 years H&M will be well over 100 years old. It's a scarey thought.

No one will give a shit about anyone, especially this in another 50 years, let alone 70.

purpledalmation · 07/04/2023 08:38

If they really have missed the rsvp date as is reported that's probably their tactic - to wield what little power they have left over the RF and cause maximum discomfort

The RSVP was Monday, so they have missed it, but are dragging it out because it gives them a semblance of power. Just rude and annoying. Charles doesn't want to tip Harry over the edge with a rejection.

Roussette · 07/04/2023 08:40

purpledalmation · 07/04/2023 08:38

If they really have missed the rsvp date as is reported that's probably their tactic - to wield what little power they have left over the RF and cause maximum discomfort

The RSVP was Monday, so they have missed it, but are dragging it out because it gives them a semblance of power. Just rude and annoying. Charles doesn't want to tip Harry over the edge with a rejection.

It is trash media reporting. Who knows if they have replied or not. So surprised posters buy into this nonsense, it's only because there's nothing else for them to report on.

Marshmallowmountain · 07/04/2023 08:40

weddingdaydancet · 06/04/2023 11:36

It’s Archie’s birthday though, so I’m not sure.

I think it’s likely a real dilemma for them, they will want to go and be part of it, but they won’t want to be publicly booed and mocked for their obvious hypocrisy. They will also want to be a key part, on the balcony, Archie recognised etc. they won’t want to be relegated to the sidelines.

with no other career path to speak of after 3 years away , they have simply made a career out of leveraging their royal connections. If they are seen to lose those, they don’t have much left to sell.

I suspect they know if they are going or not, they are just not saying to make it as difficult as possible for the royal family and their staff. Just another petty act of vengeance.

Show quote history

Agree with all of this, it’s a career decision for them

Rhondaa · 07/04/2023 08:42

Roussette · 07/04/2023 08:19

But you agree Janiie we don't know do we? So all this speculation is a total waste of time.

You have your take on it. I have mine. That's it really!
Happy Easter!

(p.s. just to let you know, I have a bunny suit just like this. Seriously, not joking... long story!)

We don't know true. We all like a bit of speculation though and looking at previous media blabbing behaviour and the fact that Harry shared that he'd been invited does suggest he'd share whether he'd accepted or declined too.

Love the bunny suit 😍

MintJulia · 07/04/2023 08:45

If Harry is worried about the security of his family (and his court action would indicate that he is), he's hardly likely to give those he perceives as the threat months of notice of his intention to travel.

That would be completely illogical.

purpledalmation · 07/04/2023 08:46

But they definitely won't be on the balcony as that's been announced.

I hope if they don't come Sophie's kids can come on the balcony, and I even wouldn't mind eugenie and Beatrice as they are close to the RF. just sneak them all in at the end just to show solidarity.

notanotheroneagain · 07/04/2023 08:52

Rhondaa · 07/04/2023 08:02

'but does anyone look at these photos and go, “”Oh, where are David and Wallis?” I don’t think so'

Exactly. Everyone knows the backstory with Harry and even if Coronation pics are looked at in decades to come his no show will be totally irrelevant.

'If they are not telling the press whether they are coming or not, I don't bloody blame them!'

Folk do keep saying this missing the bit where he excitedly 'told the press' he'd been invited, so keen to tell the press that just in case anyone thought he may be snubbed. I doubt he'll be secretly in touch with anyone of any importance probably has an email address of some junior administrative courtier and that is why he is keeping them hanging. He'll be waiting for someone senior, someone royal to call him..

David abdicated, Harry didn't. The irony of it all, because he was in love with a divorcee, and look at Charles now, not just a divorcee but a side piece while they were been married to boot.

Harry did not 'excitedly' tell the press. They put out a confirmation statement after being asked (likely by different papers and magazines). Infact, when I firsts read about it, it was the palace that confirmed that they sent the invite.

notanotheroneagain · 07/04/2023 09:02

Whenharrymetsmelly · 07/04/2023 08:25

I do find the bit about Archie's birthday amusing, like a normal person would use that as a reason not to be part of such a historical occasion. Oh sorry Dad, I can't come to your coronation, we're having a few kids over that day Hmm

Come on now, that Archie birthday date was deliberately chosen by the courtiers out of spite. Charles will unlikely have known nor cared when Archie's birthday is, and probably just signed it off. And the dutiful wife camilla apparently did not remind him either.

I imagine Charles is like most CEOs, the PA or wife have to buy the gifts and flowers and remind him of birthdays and anniversaries.

Put one over Archie every decade they have a jubilee. Phew, the spite is unreal. 😅

notanotheroneagain · 07/04/2023 09:08

MintJulia · 07/04/2023 08:45

If Harry is worried about the security of his family (and his court action would indicate that he is), he's hardly likely to give those he perceives as the threat months of notice of his intention to travel.

That would be completely illogical.

My thoughts exactly.

The only time this will be in the press is if the courtiers know, so I was wondering if the 'Earl Marshal' will be completely detached from the palace and they do not leak to the palace if H&M are coming or not till the very last minute. If they are organising everything including security, it could be possible.

Rhondaa · 07/04/2023 09:08

notanotheroneagain · 07/04/2023 08:52

David abdicated, Harry didn't. The irony of it all, because he was in love with a divorcee, and look at Charles now, not just a divorcee but a side piece while they were been married to boot.

Harry did not 'excitedly' tell the press. They put out a confirmation statement after being asked (likely by different papers and magazines). Infact, when I firsts read about it, it was the palace that confirmed that they sent the invite.

Show quote history

The reasons aren't relevant the point is both ran off to other countries and were NC with their family so therefore no shows would not have been and will not be controversial in the slightest.

Kids birthdays are no biggie, a cake and balloons are all that is required. Easily to do at any residence so I really doubt that is of relevance either and not chosen 'out of spite'. Just again, not even a consideration I'd guess.

Rhondaa · 07/04/2023 09:10

MintJulia · 07/04/2023 08:45

If Harry is worried about the security of his family (and his court action would indicate that he is), he's hardly likely to give those he perceives as the threat months of notice of his intention to travel.

That would be completely illogical.

Surely there's more sophisticated ways to monitor people's travel than waiting for an announcement in The Sun.

Original poster
Viviennemary · 07/04/2023 09:11

A King and Queen getting one over on a 4 year olds birthday. The first Coronation for 70 years. Get real. I doubt anybody gave a thought to Archie's birthday when planning the coronation. I don't know the birthdays of any royals. But now we will always know Archie's. So it's more publicity for them. They can hang on to the coat tails of the Coronation date. Oh it's Archie's birthday too. That is soooo important.

OP posts:
notanotheroneagain · 07/04/2023 09:11

Roussette · 07/04/2023 08:19

But you agree Janiie we don't know do we? So all this speculation is a total waste of time.

You have your take on it. I have mine. That's it really!
Happy Easter!

(p.s. just to let you know, I have a bunny suit just like this. Seriously, not joking... long story!)

Haha, @Roussette ,

Years ago, I once had a version of this that I brought in the US. It was very cold and snowy. Mine din't have a hood and was grey. My mates couldn't stop laughing at me and saying I look like a massive hare. It was very snuggly and warm though, so worth the tease.

That brings back memories. 😂😂😂

Whaeanui · 07/04/2023 09:12

They can hang on to the coat tails of the Coronation date. fucking nasty. It’s a child’s birthday, could you just not? Ffs

notanotheroneagain · 07/04/2023 09:14

Viviennemary · 07/04/2023 09:11

A King and Queen getting one over on a 4 year olds birthday. The first Coronation for 70 years. Get real. I doubt anybody gave a thought to Archie's birthday when planning the coronation. I don't know the birthdays of any royals. But now we will always know Archie's. So it's more publicity for them. They can hang on to the coat tails of the Coronation date. Oh it's Archie's birthday too. That is soooo important.

As I said, I don't think Charles knew.

notanotheroneagain · 07/04/2023 09:16

Rhondaa · 07/04/2023 09:10

Surely there's more sophisticated ways to monitor people's travel than waiting for an announcement in The Sun.

Show quote history

I doubt national front has any sort of sophistication.

But they have proven themselves to be extremely dangerous, nonetheless . Just from internet and media searches it looks like.

MrsMaxDeWinter · 07/04/2023 09:21

But now we will always know Archie's. So it's more publicity for them. They can hang on to the coat tails of the Coronation date. Oh it's Archie's birthday too. That is soooo important.

And there they are, the poisonous fangs. Why do you have to be so spiteful about a child who was born long BEFORE this date was announced? Do you have children? Are their birthdays not important to you? Why do you expect Harry and Meghan not to consider their first child's birthday as important as yours? And the child was born 4 years ago. So it's not "his birthday too". Or are you saying Harry and Meghan orchestrated it so that the Coronation would be on their son's birthday?

xPaz · 07/04/2023 09:21

yeh, they knew it was Archie's birthday but there were only ever three or four Saturdays in the running and they had to co-ordinate with presidents and prime ministers bishops and william and anne and edward's diaries too.

maeveiscurious · 07/04/2023 09:23

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

OnTheRunWithMannyMontana · 07/04/2023 09:25

MummyJ36 · 06/04/2023 11:17

My prediction is that Harry will come on his own and Meghan and the kids will stay in the US. After everything that’s gone on I just don’t think she’ll risk coming back to boos!! I think Harry will feel a sense of duty to come back.

I agree. And I think King Charles has given her the perfect get our clause by holding the coronation on Archie's birthday.

xPaz · 07/04/2023 09:29

My post was in response to @notanotheroneagain and @Viviennemary ie, yes, agree that Charles knew it was Archie's birthday but he and his staff were trying to work with about 10 diaries. It was the best date they could find. I really believe that. Charles is not giving anybody any ammunition wrt his fallout with H&M so he would probably have avoided that date if it had been possible.

Original poster
Viviennemary · 07/04/2023 09:29

I am saying it isnt important and not a matter for consideration when planning a national event. None of the royal children's birthdays are important to me or to anybody else. I don't know when they are and don't care. I am Not singling out Archie's birthday as unimportant.

OP posts:
Whaeanui · 07/04/2023 09:31

@Viviennemary no you’re instead saying they’ll be riding on the coattails of the coronation date coinciding with his birthday. It’s just nasty, leave the kid alone ffs