Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Drama between Eugenie/Jack and William/Kate

284 replies

AmandaJonah · 01/03/2023 11:15

I missed this last year. Apparently Eugenie and Jack had wanted to love into Adelaide Cottage as their main British residence (they also live part-time in Portugal for Jack's work). But William and Kate successfully claimed Adelaide Cottage instead as their fourth or fifth house?
This apparently led to tension between the two families. Instead Jack and Eugenie live in Nottingham Cottage which has two bedrooms. They already have one child and Eugenie is pregnant. I am guessing this is why they wanted a slightly bigger house.

www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a42035692/where-does-princess-eugenie-live-nottingham-cottage/

OP posts:
Maireas · 04/03/2023 09:20

Also, @Roussette , Eugenie had a gap year, going to amazing locations, and her security on the year long trip was paid for by the tax payer.

ThighMistress · 04/03/2023 09:23

She also had a wedding on the telly

Roussette · 04/03/2023 09:26

I think there has been a sea change. At least I hope so. I don't think we'll see the excessive freeloading quite so much. At least that's what I hope Charles means by 'slimming down'.

KnickerlessParsons · 04/03/2023 09:28

Maireas · 04/03/2023 09:18

I think we'll see less of these minor royals, they certainly won't be on the balcony any more. I think the late Queen liked to include all the grandchildren and cousins, but it's different now.

We'll see less of the big family gatherings because the family will get smaller.
The queen had 4 children, who now all have children and their own grandchildren.
As Charles and his siblings die, there will be fewer people on the balcony: Edward's children don't seem to be interested in a royal life, nor Anne's and Harry is out of the picture. Beatrice and Eugenie might hang in there but I doubt they'll bring their children up as "royal". Princess Margaret's children only turn up for family weddings and funerals.
So once William is on the throne, it'll be his children and grand children and whichever of his aunts and uncles and their spouses that are still alive and fit enough - unless they decide to retire.

ThighMistress · 04/03/2023 09:37

It’s the same in “normal” families. Once the grandparents die, their dcs have their own growing families and don’t see so much of their siblings or their dcs and their dcs.

Dh is sad about this as his older db now has a large brood of gc and we are only seen at weddings and christenings, as the rarely-seen boring old aunt and uncle tottering in (although we aren’t that old!).

Plitvice · 04/03/2023 09:38

Brooksbank is definitely not wealthy.
He enjoys the yachting scene which explains why he would get along with Andrew and his closeness to Meghan and Harry.

However, I do like how the two Yorkies seem to get on rather than competing against each other to the point of exhaustion like the Wales boys.

Maireas · 04/03/2023 09:43

Yes, Eugenie and Jack are definitely pals with Meghan and Harry. M&H have always been friendly with the Yorks, visiting them at Royal Lodge. Eugenie seems closest, though, going by her Instagram.
I agree @Plitvice , the Yorks do seem like a tight unit, that was on display at the late Queen's funeral.

purpledalmation · 04/03/2023 09:56

@Novella4

That William joined in with the 'Diana was paranoid ' line that C and C push along with their media friends, says all you need to know about William
He has not protected his mother's memory

Well that's a distortion of the facts. William said to a bbc investigation that Martin bashir's interview contributed to his mothers fear and paranoia. Diana was paranoid and lived in fear, which was totally understandable in view of her treatment by the media. She was fragile mentally and paranoia was an understandable symptom of her anxiety.

William does try to protect his mothers memory. He and Harry made a pact that the disgraceful interview would never be used again. So what did Harry do? Use the interview in the Netflix series to monetise his mothers memory. Utterly disloyal. Make money from your mothers pain. Great job Harry.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 04/03/2023 10:04

I don't think we'll see the excessive freeloading quite so much. At least that's what I hope Charles means by 'slimming down'

Let's face it, Roussette, there's a lot of faith being put in Charles's reported wish to "slim down", and while it's early days I've not seen much evidence of it so far - at least not as a result of anything he's actively chosen

The same was said about the coronation and even that's becoming a medieval fiesta, so I'm back with my original view that all he'll really want is to keep more of the baubles (and attention) for himself

Plitvice · 04/03/2023 10:09

Maireas · 04/03/2023 09:43

Yes, Eugenie and Jack are definitely pals with Meghan and Harry. M&H have always been friendly with the Yorks, visiting them at Royal Lodge. Eugenie seems closest, though, going by her Instagram.
I agree @Plitvice , the Yorks do seem like a tight unit, that was on display at the late Queen's funeral.

Andrew and Fergie are an interesting case of how two highly dysfunctional people can happily co-parent and raise two exemplary kids.

Roussette · 04/03/2023 10:19

Puzzledandpissedoff · 04/03/2023 10:04

I don't think we'll see the excessive freeloading quite so much. At least that's what I hope Charles means by 'slimming down'

Let's face it, Roussette, there's a lot of faith being put in Charles's reported wish to "slim down", and while it's early days I've not seen much evidence of it so far - at least not as a result of anything he's actively chosen

The same was said about the coronation and even that's becoming a medieval fiesta, so I'm back with my original view that all he'll really want is to keep more of the baubles (and attention) for himself

Yes. I live in hope.

I do wonder whether... Charles going on about 'slimming down' for a decade or more, was an excuse to sort Andrew out. Forget the Epstein stuff, Andrew has a very chequered past in all sorts of ways. He typifies the very very worst of the RF. And we all know his Mama indulged him. I think this slimming down is possibly just for Andrew. I imagine Charles can't stand him. And the rest of the over indulgence and royal privilege will just carry on as normal.

Nicholas Witchell was wetting his pants on BBC news this morning about the anointing oil being mixed at Mount Sanaii or something. He seriously is going to implode, how he will keep going till the actual day, god alone knows.

Maireas · 04/03/2023 10:24

@Roussette 😂😂😂 poor Nicholas Witchell, he does remind me of those hangers on at the Tudor courts!
I think you're right about the problem of Andrew, and how to make that go away, but as I said above, the Yorks are quite a tight unit, which may make it harder.

ThePoshUns · 04/03/2023 10:43

" Andrew and Fergie are an interesting case of how two highly dysfunctional people can happily co-parent and raise two exemplary kids."

Exemplary? How? @Plitvice

ajandjjmum · 04/03/2023 10:43

Then you’ve your uncle saying it’s absolutely fine and not needed, plus you see your Aunt Anne, Uncle Edward and Aunt Sophie only needing security when on official visits, but living in secure royal estates.

I was not aware that Anne and Edward had security at their homes - other than the normal locks, bolts and few security cameras. I had read that their only security was when they are doing official work, which is fair enough.

CathyorClaire · 04/03/2023 10:56

Beatrice’s husband is seriously wealthy in his own right

This seems to be the accepted line but there just doesn't seem to be any hard evidence for it.

A quick peek at the last published accounts for his company reveals it can escape full auditing under small business rules.

Would never surprise me to find B had coughed for the Cotswold gaff out of one or other of her trust funds.

Plitvice · 04/03/2023 11:01

ThePoshUns · 04/03/2023 10:43

" Andrew and Fergie are an interesting case of how two highly dysfunctional people can happily co-parent and raise two exemplary kids."

Exemplary? How? @Plitvice

They don't put a foot wrong. They always behave well, they seem responsible, work a little (even if some might consider them idle). They handle the experience well of being minor royals without getting loud and silly or over indulging (unlike their parents).

In the early days, the media came for them (especially Bea) but they took the constructive criticism on board and were low key enough to eventually escape it's clutches.

stillavid · 04/03/2023 11:05

Have people seen the interview with Sarah in the telegraph? It is quite interesting as she is v v v careful in what she says.

It is behind a paywall if you don't subscribe.

Maireas · 04/03/2023 11:06

Can you summarise, @stillavid ?

vera99 · 04/03/2023 11:08

ThighMistress · 04/03/2023 08:50

You know what poshos are like, @Roussette . Middle-class people (me!) would rather die than free-load, but ime posh people spend their whole time trading on connections. They never pay for a holiday, they’re always “staying with friends”. They never go through a job application process, someone always “finds” them something.

Someone like the Brooksbank fellow seems blandly pleasant enough but is the hanger-on in the ski chalet with the indefinable “drinks PR” job.

That's why they are rich, entitled and happy to have a nation of fawning cap doffers and forelock tuggers waving the flag and paying deference to their betters and elders and push the concept of nationhood inextricably linked to their good fortune and existence. It's no accident that armed services swear their loyalty to the Crown, not the state.

The rich man in his castle,
The poor man at his gate,
God made them, high or lowly,
And ordered their estate.

God Save the King !|

vera99 · 04/03/2023 11:10

Maireas · 04/03/2023 11:06

Can you summarise, @stillavid ?

Sarah Ferguson: The real reason I’ll always stand by Prince Andrew

Ahead of her new novel, the Duchess of York talks exclusively about supporting her ‘poor’ ex-husband and why Diana would be proud of Harry
By Celia Walden 3 March 2023 • 9:00am

Ask the Duchess of York what the best piece of advice Queen Elizabeth ever gave her was, and she doesn’t have to think about it for a second. ‘Be yourself, Sarah. All anyone wants is for you to just be yourself.’ She gives a wistful smile. ‘I’ve always found that hard. It’s taken me this long to get there.’

This surprises me. I always thought the 63-year-old was ahead of her time in the ‘being herself’ department: a ‘take me or leave me’ trailblazer. From the whimsical Lindka Cierach dress she chose to wear when she married Prince Andrew in 1986 and the way she navigated both their divorce and her royal exit six years later, to her reinvention as a New York Times bestselling author, the Duchess has never struck me as someone hemmed in by convention.

Certainly, the woman sitting across the table from me in The River Café now – still in full make-up from our shoot, wearing an asymmetrical black and white blazer by a Spanish brand – is 100 proof, neat ‘Fergie’, asking our waitress where she’s from in Poland, and telling her about the trip to Warsaw she took last year as part of the work she’s doing with Ukrainian refugees for her charity, Sarah’s Trust. And it’s easy to see why the Queen remained so close to her warm, energetic former daughter-in-law, even entrusting her corgis to the Duchess after she died.

‘Every day I look at Muick and Sandy and want to say, “It’s all right.”’ Sarah shakes her head. ‘HM used to give them little bits of digestive biscuits, so after lunch now I’ll crack up a biscuit for them and deliberately make that same noise.’

She and the late Queen Elizabeth enjoyed long chats on their regular dog walks over the years, and the Duchess’s eyes grow sheeny as she tells me about the late monarch’s ‘ability to listen and never judge’.

‘She was able to completely and utterly dilute chaos. And still carry on. And still smile. And still go through everything that she went through.’

‘Queen Elizabeth was more of a mother to me than my own mother’

Even to those of us who never met Queen Elizabeth, that idea of her being able to ‘dilute chaos’ rings so true. I’ve always imagined that our late monarch must have been much more forgiving and understanding than others of her generation – about the ups and downs of life, about mistakes and such things as divorce? ‘She understood all of it. Everything. And it wasn’t even about forgiving, but a way of life. Duty, sense of purpose, but of course never judgment.’

The Duchess will always be grateful to have had ‘even a minute of HM’s time’, she tells me. ‘Because also, during the last three years, her poor son [Prince Andrew] has been going through such a tumultuous time, and I think HM was very relieved I could help her with him, so we became even closer, then.

‘But I’ve always admired and adored her. Really, she was more of a mother to me than my mother.’

On the subject of Prince Andrew, I ask whether these past three years have made her tight-knit family even closer, but she replies with a question of her own, asking how I would feel if, say, my own daughter fell over at school?

‘You want to say: “Get up, come on, it’s fine!” You don’t want her to be hurting. And I think it’s really sad to see what Andrew has been through.’

And was Queen Elizabeth confident that Sarah would be there for Prince Andrew when she no longer could be? ‘She knew,’ she confirms quietly. ‘I will always be there. Always. Because I love her.’
The Duchess with the Duke
The pair have remained incredibly close despite their divorce Credit: Samir Hussein/WireImage

This level of openness so early on in our interview is disarming. I’ve met the Duchess before on a number of occasions, as well as her daughters, Princesses Beatrice, 34, and Eugenie, 32 – who are both strikingly kind and easy-going – and I had hoped she would feel comfortable with me. But we’re here to talk about her new Mills & Boon novel, A Most Intriguing Lady, and given the herd of elephants in the room today – from the latest twist in Prince Andrew’s court settlement with Virginia Giuffre, to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry and the reverberations of his memoir, Spare – I had expected to find her more guarded.

Remembering a line from an interviewer who once described the Duchess as wearing her heart not so much on her sleeve as from ‘head to toe’, I quote it. She liked that line, she says. I wonder whether despite the problems it has caused her over the years, part of her just doesn’t want to be a tightly zipped person. Her forthrightness is infectious. Whether in the photographic studio earlier or here in the restaurant, people are drawn into ‘Fergie’s’ emotional vortex and offer up confidences immediately. Within minutes there’s hugging, hand pressing. There’s Fergie, sending her best wishes to sick relatives she’s never met, and handing out life mantras to people who were strangers only minutes ago.

‘It’s the storyteller in me,’ she explains. ‘I’m naturally curious – always have been.’ Like the Duchess, Lady Mary, the heroine of her new novel, is acutely observant and fascinated by people. Inspired by one of Sarah’s own ancestors – her great-great-aunt, Lady Mary Montagu Douglas Scott – she forms an unlikely alliance with the dashing Colonel Walter Trefusis in order to solve a crime, and quickly finds herself falling for her fellow sleuth.

As with the Duchess’s first foray into Mills & Boon in 2021, the novel was co-written with historical romance author Marguerite Kaye. ‘We call our writing process “collabor-writing”,’ she tells me, ‘because it’s a real two-way thing. Our text goes back and forth between us, and we’ll chat on the phone pretty much daily.’
Sarah Ferguson

Mills & Boon felt like a natural fit for a woman who has always craved the kind of uplifting escapism the books provide. ‘It’s that promise of a feel-good fix,’ she says. ‘And I love celebration, I love romance, I love anything that takes me into joy.’ She frowns, the twitch of a smile at the corners of her mouth. ‘I take joy very seriously indeed.’

For the first book to have been a bestseller on both sides of the Atlantic was unhoped for. ‘I feel really proud to be a new novelist in my 60s! Like my life is just beginning,’ she enthuses. ‘And I’ve told Jeffrey Archer that I want to beat him with this one.’

Now, the Duchess admits she is ‘in talks for a major US TV series involving both books’. She gives a Cheshire cat grin. ‘It’s very exciting. You know, I’ve wanted to be a romantic novelist for 20 years or more, and I never gave up on my dream.’

One of her favourite quotes comes from the great Sidney Poitier, she says: ‘It’s difficult when you’re carrying other people’s dreams. You have to hold on to the dream that’s inside yourself and know if you’re true to that, that’s really all that matters.’

I’m assuming this is a reference to all the baggage that comes with marrying into the Royal family. Baggage that didn’t disappear with her divorce. And, of course, Sarah could teach Gwyneth Paltrow a thing or two about ‘conscious uncoupling’.

‘Every little girl dreams of being a princess – I loved every minute of it’

Whatever your view may be on her enduring loyalty to her ex-husband, with whom she still lives at Royal Lodge when in the UK, she seems to have pulled off that rare feat: an amicable divorce. ‘I think we have an amazing mutual understanding of one another,’ she explains. ‘We’ve always been like that. Also, we both hate confrontation.’

As for the Poitier quote, she’ll only explain its significance obliquely. ‘I think that for those to whom a lot of responsibility is given you must always remember that the minute you walk out your front door, you need to be electable but never elected.’

The Duchess dons an earnest expression. ‘Remember that the dream of every little girl is to be a princess, and I was a princess. And I loved every minute of it.’

I stare at her. Sorry: what? She can’t possibly have loved every minute. When Sarah became the first royal to sit down for an interview with Oprah Winfrey in 1996, she told the US chat show host that royal life was ‘not a fairy tale’.

‘The thing is,’ she counters today, ‘I had the great honour of being the Queen’s daughter-in-law, and therefore I couldn’t not see every single second as a great learning curve.’ OK. But having to get all dressed up for royal functions… ‘Loved it.’ Having to sit through those functions? ‘Loved it. Loved it.’
Queen Elizabeth and Sarah Ferguson
‘I always admired and adored Queen Elizabeth’

She breaks off, drizzles some balsamic over her mozzarella salad, and resumes. ‘Listen, if every little girl’s dream is to be a princess, then your job is to uphold that dream. So I don’t ever want to let it down.’

Particularly now, after Queen Elizabeth’s death, the Duchess goes on, ‘it’s unbelievably important to uphold Her Majesty’s legacy. And although I’m not a member of the Royal family any more, my values are what I believe is right – and that’s what they uphold.’

For that reason, she has always said to her daughters: ‘Even when you’re just walking out of your own front door, always smile. Uphold all that. No one wants to see a grumpy princess.’

I burst out laughing, and the Duchess joins in. ‘Is that going to be your headline?’ she jokes. Probably. I mean, I hate to point out the obvious, but someone has killed the dream quite dramatically, haven’t they? By being a very grumpy ‘princess’ indeed.

Sarah raises an eyebrow. She’s going to make me say it. I’m talking about Meghan Markle, I say leadenly. The Duchess takes a bite of her salad; chews for a moment. ‘I don’t really know Meghan. I haven’t really met her. I spoke to her at the funeral, and I thought she looked absolutely beautiful. I think she is beautiful.’
56799918
Fergie on Diana: ‘We both supported each other’ Credit: Tim Graham/ Getty

No argument there. But has she damaged the Royal family? ‘It is absolutely not my place to answer that,’ says the Duchess in a single exhalation. ‘She has made Harry very happy, and that is so nice. Honestly, he’s so happy with her. She really loves him. And I think that’s beautiful – and that Diana would be proud of him and her lovely grandchildren.’

Did she watch the Netflix documentary? She widens her eyes but stays silent. When I repeat the question, the Duchess holds up a finger: ‘I’m just trying to think… Right.’ She’s formulated a response. ‘So, I think I’m a devourer of information on Netflix.’ OK… ‘And I love watching everything on Netflix.’ What am I supposed to do with that? She chuckles. ‘I also think that one day I’d like to do a documentary.’ A similar one? ‘I don’t know. I can’t be led,’ she says, shutting me down. ‘Not on this.’

‘Diana was called beautiful and tall and I was fat, frumpy Fergie’

Does she think Diana would have liked Meghan, I venture? Tilting her head to one side the Duchess deadpans: ‘I feel sorry for you.’ Still laughing at the put-down, I try something else: given the Duchess also relocated to the US after leaving the Royal family, does she think fleeing Britain really will turn out to be Prince Harry’s best chance at happiness? ‘I can’t speak for him,’ she says with a small sigh, ‘but I will say that after I got divorced, I spent 12 years in America, writing books, and it was a wonderful place for me. I felt free there. And I can’t thank Americans enough for the way they were with me. So,’ she nods, ‘I can understand why he would [do that].’

For a moment, Sarah looks dejected. ‘Why do people always judge?’ she asks quietly. ‘They can have a view, but don’t put someone down to have that view.’ It’s a fair point, particularly when you consider the judgments thrown at ‘Fergie’ over the years. And of course, women get it far worse than men.

‘Over 30 years,’ she says. ‘It started in August 1988.’ Tonelessly, Sarah runs through some of the worst headlines: ‘“The Duchess of Pork”; “82 per cent would rather sleep with a goat than Fergie.” Shall I go on?’

Then there was the pitting of her against Diana. ‘All the time. Everywhere. Because Diana was beautiful and tall, running out of the gym, and I was fat, frumpy Fergie coming behind. Sometimes “fat, frumpy, frolicking Fergie”. Lots of “fs”.’ Was the Princess of Wales sympathetic? ‘We both supported each other.’

The Duchess of York had a well-documented binge-eating disorder which, understandably, got worse around that time. ‘For 10 years all that caused me to have even more of a problem. Bad Fergie sold papers. Bad Fergie still sells papers.’

But her difficult relationship with food started years before that, she says. ‘From the age of 15, I was never thin enough. Good enough. Correct enough. I didn’t take things seriously enough. Everything was never enough.’ Where does she think that feeling comes from? ‘Oh I know where it comes from.’
Sarah Ferguson
Credit: Photography by Violeta Sofia; Styling by Tona Stell; Hair by Ben Cooke; Make-up by Hannah Martin

The daughter of Major Ronald Ferguson and his first wife, Susan, came from what Sarah once described as ‘country gentry with a bit of old money’. As a child she loved horse riding and won many cups. But when she was 12, her parents separated and within a few years her mother had eloped with an Argentinian polo player. ‘Why would your own mother leave you?’ she asks. ‘Can you imagine it? So how could I possibly have managed?

‘Then, when I got to 15 my sister went to live in Australia, and I was left with Dad.’ She shakes her head. ‘That must be really bad for someone, mustn’t it? To have so much punishment? To be abandoned? But you know, I think that’s why I’m such a good mother.’

Was she never able to ‘fix’ the eating disorder: that feeling she was never good enough? ‘No. I think you learn to live with what Martin Luther King called “the inaudible language of the heart”.’ Doing things for others has been more therapeutic than anything else, she admits.

Her work on children’s education, most recently as an ambassador for Montessori schools (she will be announcing plans for a new charitable fund later this year), has been deeply rewarding, she says. The blind Ukrainian children’s choir she welcomed here just before Christmas, ‘so uplifting’. ‘But I have many scars,’ she says, ‘and my scars are really, really big. Because they have come from major obstacles.’

‘Perception can make or break someone... and I see what it has done to Andrew’

She tells me about the moment she broke down in tears, earlier in the week, in the middle of a meeting at London’s Berkeley hotel about the promotion of A Most Intriguing Lady. Suddenly it all ‘became too much for my strength to cope with’, she explains. ‘And I just thought: “I can’t.”’

Because she probably feels she has to be strong for everyone else? ‘I do have to be at the moment, yes. Because it has been…’ She pauses, presses her lips together, as if to stop herself from saying more. Then: ‘When Andrew went through a hard time, I used to be able to throw it to The Boss…’ But she can’t do that now. ‘No.’

We’re finishing our desserts when she points out that I’m wrong about ‘women getting it worse than men’. ‘Perception is… so important. It can make or break someone. And I’m living with someone – at least when I’m in England and lucky enough to be a guest at Royal Lodge – and I see what that perception has done to a very kind man. I really mean that.’

Shortly after our interview it was reported that Prince Andrew was set to have his £249,000 annual allowance cut from April – sources claimed he feared this would mean he would be forced out of Royal Lodge. Other reports suggested that he had been offered Frogmore Cottage, the UK home of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

The Duchess had no comment to make on this.

After almost two hours with Sarah, I can see that she really does ‘take joy very seriously indeed’. Because the moments of despondency always end on an up-note: a reason to feel grateful. ‘It’s just amazing how good a grandfather Andrew is,’ she’s telling me now, her face brightening at the thought of her grandchildren.

Eugenie and her husband Jack Brooksbank had baby August in 2021, just a few months before Princess Beatrice welcomed a daughter, Sienna, with husband Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi. ‘To the point that I’ve got FOMO,’ she says with a laugh. ‘That I worry he’s a better grandparent than me! And it’s lovely to see after what he’s been through. He was always very good with his mum, who adored him. And now he’s very good as a grandfather.’
Sarah Ferguson with the corgis
With the late Queen’s corgis, Sandy and Muick, who were entrusted to her Credit: Instagram

Our time together is coming to an end, and Sarah is ordering a slice of the Chocolate Nemesis cake to take away, because, she tells our waitress, ‘my ex-husband loves it’.

The Duchess has probably already said more than she planned to today. But there is one last thing I want to ask. The coronation is a little over two months away, so how significant does she think 6 May will be in terms of breathing fresh life into the institution she venerates?

‘I think it’ll be an extraordinary moment,’ she says. ‘And I feel really strongly that the King is brilliant. He upholds everything that is good. I mean, what he’s done for the environment! What he’s done in his life! How he loves to paint, how he loves to walk, how he loves to be.

‘He is a very special person. So for him to have a moment where everybody looks up and understands how hard he and the Royal family has worked, is important.’

It should, Sarah believes, ‘be a moment when the entire world will say, right: we’ve got this. And now we’ll unite again and go on again. We are not…’ she laughs, corrects herself, ‘they are not celebrities. They are part of an extraordinary institution, and they go out and do their work. That’s what I did when I became a princess.

‘Whatever happened, happened. We don’t go back. But whether I’m in or out, I’ll always uphold it.’

PlaitBilledDuckyPuss · 04/03/2023 11:14

From the whimsical Lindka Cierach dress she chose to wear when she married Prince Andrew in 1986

It was not a 'whimsical dress'. It might look whimsical in 2023 but back in 1986 everything was festooned with silly bows and frills!

PlaitBilledDuckyPuss · 04/03/2023 11:15

We call our writing process “collabor-writing”,’

😂

Roussette · 04/03/2023 11:17

I'd read part of that article, thanks for the whole of it. I was ambivalent until she started extolling the virtues of her wonderful very kind husband and how hard done by he is.

And the ridiculous breaking down at London's Berkeley Hotel as she promotes yet another book under her Duchess name. (I think this is about the 70th?)

stillavid · 04/03/2023 11:18

I did feel sorry for her over the press she received, how she so clearly remembers it and how upsetting it must have been to have been constantly compared to Diana and found wanting.

But yes her relationship with Andrew is just ummm odd - I have always assumed transactional but there seems to be a lot of affection.

Maireas · 04/03/2023 11:26

Thanks, @vera99 - what does she mean, she's never really met Meghan? According to Meghan, she and Harry were visitors to Royal Lodge and Sarah taught Meghan how to curtsey. M&H are friends with the York family, why minimise it?.
Anyway, Andrew's "tumultuous year" isn't wrong. Although "poor Andrew" maybe stretching it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread