@purpledalmation asks why Meghan's star quality was not so much in evidence until she met Harry?
It's simple.
She was number 6 on the call sheet of a cable show. She had a lifestyle blog, did speeches wrote a few articles. Modest success as an actress, yes.
And yet, when she joined the royal family, everything she did, all the D list, Z list things, she did with far more charisma, personality and creativity than Charles, William, Camilla and Kate, Sophie or Edward. She has more charisma than the six of them put together.
I know its exasperating to think that a D or Z list actress gave such adrenaline to a 1000 year institution. But it says a lot that a D or Z list actress is more charismatic than the six most senior royals.
It's very simple.
It's what happens when you create a situation based on primogeniture, who is born first, and not who is right for the job. Add to this the entitlement that because X is ranked number 3 or 4, there is no need to even study to be better at the job, No continuing education, no public speaking lessons, no diversity training. Just weird protocols and gossip and backbiting and worrying about who curtsies to who.
So here's the thing: D list or Z list Meghan exposed the Royal Family for the moribund stuck in the mud institution it is with petty minded people obsessed wit rank and headlines.
It is embarrassing for Britain that this Number Six on the Call Sheet D or z list actress was more charismatic than those born to the role. If she had really wanted the job, there would have been no stopping her. So it's very very good for the Remainers that she left. They just did not expect that the only born royal with any charisma or personality than all of them, Harry, would go with her too.