"Kate's Rebranding Masterclass May Finally See off Meghan"

[MrsMaxDeWinter]

"Five months since she moved up to the second tier of the monarchy, the Princess has started beefing up her top team to make sure she succeeds not only with her “life’s work” on child development, but also with the task of besting Meghan Markle."

Why does Meghan have to look bad for Kate to look good? Why does Meghan need to be bested or seen off? Why is it a competition?

archive.ph/2023.02.08-070754/www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2023/02/08/kates-rebranding-masterclass-may-finally-see-meghan/

@MarshaBradyo
Have a look at who has owned yougov

My point is - why include Harry ?

They need him. The media need him because he's the only one who generates interest

The royals need him as a hate figure so they can benefit .

It's all manufactured

So Harry was forced to keep his titles? Forced? Both he and Meghan could, you know, just stop using them if they find titles from a terrible institution so against their ethos. Obviously they also wouldn't want titles for their children having made so much fuss about it.

I find republicans in favour and defending Harry about as baffling as turkeys voting for Christmas!

They also ask about the monarchy itself though so not just Harry. You can track the feelings for the Queen, Charles, William etc

Harry has stood out recently due to book and press so he’ll come up in the same way the Jubilee did and the strikes, and who you would vote for - it’s really not pro government btw often the results are very anti

The speed with with MN deleted my post, when I was clearly referring to the media and their coverage.

Well, the post's gone now, so people can't see what you wrote. Several people have queried that you appeared to accuse a pp of racism, so your post was, at best, ambiguous. I can't remember the exact wording, but it didn't sound to me as if you were referring to the media. Probably hence MN deleting it, eh?

@Coxspurplepippin , the post was in reply to this post! , and definitely had the word racism in it! .
Possibly deleted because it was so left field and no one could accuse @Serenster of being racist!

Haha, Actually someone asked me about said woman (I'm guessing the same poster who has now gone and created a new post about this woman). I honestly forgot her name by yesterday. Was baffled by the name thread at first - wondered if it was one of the married ins.

Yep, the 'he should have stayed with some blonde lady' narrative has been going on and on. 🙄

He is madly in love with a black woman (one drop rule) , get over it ! 😂😂

Did he need to be so nasty about the housemistress at his boarding school to do that? He was a naughty 13 year old, fair enough not unusual, that as a man approaching 40 he would describe a woman like that is not OK in my book. He should have a bit of respect.

She isn't black, the one drop rule is vile and racist and as the white mother of mixed race children I wish people would stop writing the white side of the family out.

You seem to be the only person making racist comments. Crossing out your "one drop rule" comment does not make it OK.

All all of the land and most of the properties and assets should be given back to the people.

Support the well-being of people by enabling full right to roam on the land.

Address the UK’s spiralling food prices and declining food security by dividing up the rural parcels of land into affordable farms to support new entrants who are trained land workers but who can’t afford the huge sums land now costs to grow food.

I’m on the fence as to whether Charles’s coronation should go ahead or not.

Not , well you did go onto that thread and accuse the woman in question of being, amongst of things ..... a gold digger, chasing fame , a grifter , a liar , a bit part character and unattractive and beneath Harry !

Absolutely not !

A woc, and children of colour in the RF for ages, and you want them removed.

He better not (it's not even going to look good on our history).

He committed no crime and did nothing really. Where you so up in arms about removal of titles for the queen's cousin going to jail for physical abuse of a woman, or Mountbatten with his boy abuse stories, maybe even the duke of Marlborough with his arrest record and drug abuse sheet as long as an arm?

Are you even calling out Andrew and his family to have titles removed ?

PS : I am still waiting for MM to be proved a 'liar' regarding A&L not getting their titles, because I have not seen this yet.

Also should be noted that people who follow the rf topic generally read most of the threads there , so can see all posts and know what is said on other threads.

A side character, yes.
You just made up the rest.

Why the desperation to making things up?

I’m surprised at the reaction to support going down. Seems really invested.

As for media needing him in pp. He’s just done a full on book launch via the media. Granted they probably loved all the articles that could be created so easily. But still, he’s turning up to press events, interviews etc by choice.

@notanotheroneagain , this is absolute rubbish! , I'm amazed you could write such absurd crap! , show anywhere in my post that mentions Meghan, or indeed says Harry should be removed?
Your just adding your own spin on unrelated posts now and anyone who can read will see the rubbish your spouting.

Would you like me to go to the thread in question and screenshot your comments and post them here?
I'm lazy but will oblige!
However if posters go to the older woman comes forward thread they can read for themselves!

You just LITERALLY said he must remove himself from the line of succession !

You are the one spouting rubbish.

She isn't black, the one drop rule is vile and racist and as the white mother of mixed race children I wish people would stop writing the white side of the family out.

African Americans refer to the one drop rule all the time. Not really up to you to dictate this as 'vile and racist'.

I see @jeffgoldblum has entered the fray.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

Sigh.

All this.

I did ask if people are even aware of who owns yougov.

@ChungusBoi

I agree of course

Unfortunately Chalres Windsor will do exactly as he pleases re the con- a -nation .
All that 'scaled down ' talk was more lies to placate the naive

Let them eat cake !

We will be paying for it all

@MrsMaxDeWinter and? I've been reading all posts and threads and not commenting, however do you think @Serenster was racist? .