Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Mike and Zara

290 replies

MonsoonMadness · 16/01/2023 17:55

I've caught a few items on the news about this pair. They seem to be ramping up their public presence in a rather strange way. Salacious and attention seeking. What is going on?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
MonsoonMadness · 18/01/2023 23:06

Really? Are the Powers That Be reading MN do you think??

OP posts:
lollipoprainbow · 18/01/2023 23:07

@Blossomtoes nice way to change the subject.

lollipoprainbow · 18/01/2023 23:09

@babsanderson agreed Harry and Meghan were laughing along with him. Camilla sat there with her head quivering and giving side eye to Kate who was a bit more discreet. Beatrice was looking for someone to get eye contact with while smirking and Zara looked very high and mighty.

babsanderson · 18/01/2023 23:11

That is not what I said at all. Harry and Meghan were laughing at something funny in the sermon, others were laughing at the preacher.

Find me some video that shows what was actually happening in sequence and you will see.

babsanderson · 18/01/2023 23:12

Some of the Royal Family members are incredibly rude at times.

RedAndBlueStripedGolfingUmbrella · 18/01/2023 23:12

That is not what I said at all. Harry and Meghan were laughing at something funny in the sermon, others were laughing at the preacher.
This

RiktheButler · 18/01/2023 23:13

She needed the toilet

She told her husband she needed the toilet

Why don't you believe that she needed the toilet?

Coxspurplepippin · 18/01/2023 23:17

lollipoprainbow · 18/01/2023 23:09

@babsanderson agreed Harry and Meghan were laughing along with him. Camilla sat there with her head quivering and giving side eye to Kate who was a bit more discreet. Beatrice was looking for someone to get eye contact with while smirking and Zara looked very high and mighty.

So Harry and Meghan were laughing with the preacher and everyone else was being rude?

Or maybe Harry and Meghan were laughing at the preacher and everyone else was Hmm at their behaviour. I bet that was it.

Blossomtoes · 18/01/2023 23:20

lollipoprainbow · 18/01/2023 23:07

@Blossomtoes nice way to change the subject.

Thought you’d like it. After all you’re very keen on context.

lollipoprainbow · 18/01/2023 23:22

@Blossomtoes yes I am

jtaeapa · 18/01/2023 23:43

I don't mind Zara and Mike, however if I have to see more pictures of his bloody tongue, then I am going to start to think he is odious.

MonsoonMadness · 18/01/2023 23:44

They e got three kids. Larking around like teenagers is a bit yuk.

OP posts:
babsanderson · 19/01/2023 00:09

@Coxspurplepippin If the relevant video had not been removed from the internet we could watch it and decide for ourselves.

Roussette · 19/01/2023 08:36

Frighteningly the Royals do have the power to effectively rewrite history

They certainly have the power to block things and manipulate what we see and know. The Queen didn't want their fly on the wall documentary from decades ago ever to see light of day again... blocked. William didn't want the video of Diana's interview shown again and he instructed news chnnels accordingly.

And yesterday I was looking for a still of It's a Royal knockout (it was in the context of a post on here that I didn't do in the end). I am pretty techy but there is not one pic that, despite being downloaded by me, can be uploaded on here... after quite a few attempts with different pics, I gave up and assumed they've been blocked by the RF. There are clips of it on Youtube, that was not what I wanted.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded. Many a time I have searched for pictures or articles that I have seen before on the internet... conveniently disappeared.

Coxspurplepippin · 19/01/2023 08:42

babsanderson · 19/01/2023 00:09

@Coxspurplepippin If the relevant video had not been removed from the internet we could watch it and decide for ourselves.

Hilarious. Seriously.

DoraSpenlow · 19/01/2023 09:10

@Roussette

Sorry. It was a challenge. The originals need to be JPG, PNG r GIF

Mike and Zara
babsanderson · 19/01/2023 10:25

Roussette · 19/01/2023 08:36

Frighteningly the Royals do have the power to effectively rewrite history

They certainly have the power to block things and manipulate what we see and know. The Queen didn't want their fly on the wall documentary from decades ago ever to see light of day again... blocked. William didn't want the video of Diana's interview shown again and he instructed news chnnels accordingly.

And yesterday I was looking for a still of It's a Royal knockout (it was in the context of a post on here that I didn't do in the end). I am pretty techy but there is not one pic that, despite being downloaded by me, can be uploaded on here... after quite a few attempts with different pics, I gave up and assumed they've been blocked by the RF. There are clips of it on Youtube, that was not what I wanted.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded. Many a time I have searched for pictures or articles that I have seen before on the internet... conveniently disappeared.

I totally agree. If I was techy I would save every example of videos and photos that show any member of the Royal Family in a poor light on my PC. Because they do often vanish later.

Coxspurplepippin · 19/01/2023 10:48

babsanderson · 19/01/2023 10:25

I totally agree. If I was techy I would save every example of videos and photos that show any member of the Royal Family in a poor light on my PC. Because they do often vanish later.

So you think the RF have power over Google, foreign press etc? Barking.

babsanderson · 19/01/2023 10:50

@Coxspurplepippin Find me a full copy of the televised version of Queen Elizabeth's funeral? Its not possible, only an edited version that is Palace approved.

Coxspurplepippin · 19/01/2023 10:56

What was controversial about the Queen's funeral that an edited copy is required? I just googled full coverage queen's funeral and the top 3 hits are over 8 hours long - I think that's pretty full coverage, no? I don't remember the funeral being 27 hours long and now we only have the 8 hours edited highlights.

Roussette · 19/01/2023 10:58

Thank you! @DoraSpenlow
It was hard to find for me!

derxa · 19/01/2023 10:59

Samcro · 18/01/2023 22:11

I watched the wedding and saw Zara making faces when the pastor was preaching

Everyone up and down the country was making faces

Roussette · 19/01/2023 11:01

babsanderson · 19/01/2023 10:50

@Coxspurplepippin Find me a full copy of the televised version of Queen Elizabeth's funeral? Its not possible, only an edited version that is Palace approved.

Oh @babsanderson how right you are

This proves it.

twitter.com/Caeso_K/status/1612259919499083776

How anyone can think otherwise beats me.

Roussette · 19/01/2023 11:02

A WhatsAPP group between Royal Staff and the BBC, ITV and Sky where they either approved or refused use of certain footage.

Roussette · 19/01/2023 11:08

Here is the full article. It explains what we're up against with the RF choosing what is shown about them. And what isn't.

They obviously want to veto/scrub Charles's embarrassing argument with an inkwell at the Accession signing...

Swipe left for the next trending thread