Page 17 | Where is Meghan?

StarInTheHeavens · 2023-01-15T19:07:10+00:00

I haven't seen hide-nor-hair of Meghan since the book release which is uncharacteristic of her. Even with the Montecito floods there was no news. So I'm wondering how this is playing out? Happiness or anger behind closed doors?

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 20:14

purpledalmation · 03/03/2023 20:03

@AliceOlive Have you seen the you tuber Nate the lawyer and how he exposes the twitter misuse by the man on the Netflix reality show? Can't remember his name, but it shows him making offensive tweets about K&W, and how twitter completely debunks his assertion there was a concerted campaign against Meghan? Has proper evidence, tax returns, legal papers etc. exposes the whole thing he says on Netflix.

Fascinating. I will check it out.

PreparationPreparationPrep · 03/03/2023 20:20

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 19:34

Not expecting a reply from the actual poster.

It's been my experience lately that posters who do drive-by, inarticulate posts like what I quoted above will then ignore any attempts at discussion.

Mumsnet SussexRoyal Chorus.

This is the most insincere post I've seen in a while and that's saying something. - this is done on both sides and you know it! but you can only notice it from your point of view.

purpledalmation · 03/03/2023 20:23

https://www.youtube.com/live/eTWXYtWclRE?feature=share

purpledalmation · 03/03/2023 20:25

A shorter version lol

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 20:26

@PreparationPreparationPrep we moved on.

and moving on… Samantha‘a tweets are really batshit. No question about that. And it’s good she was banned from Twitter. I hadn’t read all that nonsense before as I don’t pay attention to her. In fact I think she actually had a big hand in all of the problems because she influenced Markle who then failed to show up for his own Daughter’s wedding.

purpledalmation · 03/03/2023 20:27

I love this guy

BLM activist calls Harry and Meghan liars.

PreparationPreparationPrep · 03/03/2023 20:30

Nice analogy... 😉But if they were very devious, they could have named changed after their dump. But I DIDN'T DO THAT.

Someone tried this on another thread and ended up disgracing themselves. Basically a name change failure. As if it wasn't embarrassing enough Then @AliceOlive comes along to make excuses for their behaviour just because they were part of the anti M squad.

Sorry Not sorry ....honestly you had to be there!

PreparationPreparationPrep · 03/03/2023 20:32

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 20:26

@PreparationPreparationPrep we moved on.

and moving on… Samantha‘a tweets are really batshit. No question about that. And it’s good she was banned from Twitter. I hadn’t read all that nonsense before as I don’t pay attention to her. In fact I think she actually had a big hand in all of the problems because she influenced Markle who then failed to show up for his own Daughter’s wedding.

Oh I see so we now only go back as far as it suits you 🤣🤣 you dictate the pace of threads.

PreparationPreparationPrep · 03/03/2023 20:49

purpledalmation · 03/03/2023 20:27

I love this guy

BLM activist calls Harry and Meghan liars.

I'm guessing might also "love" Candace Owens

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 21:00

PreparationPreparationPrep · 03/03/2023 20:30

Nice analogy... 😉But if they were very devious, they could have named changed after their dump. But I DIDN'T DO THAT.

Someone tried this on another thread and ended up disgracing themselves. Basically a name change failure. As if it wasn't embarrassing enough Then @AliceOlive comes along to make excuses for their behaviour just because they were part of the anti M squad.

Sorry Not sorry ....honestly you had to be there!

Do you realize that I was the poster that immediately pointed out what that person had written about another, well known pro H&M poster was incorrect?

I stuck around afterward and checked in with the maligned poster also. She knows I had her back.

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 21:16

Not going to reply, right?

CathyorClaire · 03/03/2023 21:19

They have recently massively fuck up their own brand

TBF they've been doing that from the get-go.

I honestly don't know what gone wrong with their PR

They are the living proof you can't polish a turd.

PreparationPreparationPrep · 03/03/2023 21:27

@AliceOlive
It's a bit odd - I post. You reply in your own time. You post and I'm supposed to reply in your time.

Anyway in response. . - from what I remember you made an excuse that she made a mistake - but her intentions was to humiliate , which was clear to anyone l, the mistake was that she got it wrong - twice.

Samcro · 03/03/2023 21:35

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 19:15

Do you think Samantha speaking about her sister to the media is ok?

Show quote history

Well aren’t you a peach I just saw your other post having a dig at me.
i don’t spend 24/7 on mn so sometimes don’t see where I have been quoted
don’t understand your question anyway.
what has SM got to do with Kate.

Samcro · 03/03/2023 21:38

PreparationPreparationPrep · 03/03/2023 20:20

This is the most insincere post I've seen in a while and that's saying something. - this is done on both sides and you know it! but you can only notice it from your point of view.

Show quote history

Thank you
i am going to blank that poster from now on

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 21:40

PreparationPreparationPrep · 03/03/2023 21:27

@AliceOlive
It's a bit odd - I post. You reply in your own time. You post and I'm supposed to reply in your time.

Anyway in response. . - from what I remember you made an excuse that she made a mistake - but her intentions was to humiliate , which was clear to anyone l, the mistake was that she got it wrong - twice.

I publicly pointed out that a poster misidentified another poster, as soon as it happened. Similar user names, but not the same poster.

I supported the misidentified poster in doing so. I also explained why I knew it could not have been her. It was an egregious misidentification given the details.

I gave the other poster the benefit of doubt for the sake of harmony. I was clearly wrong and that proved itself out quickly and the wrong poster melted into a writing puddle of snakes.

I’m no hypocrite. I feel good about how I handled the whole thing. Thank you for the opportunity to rehash it.

vera99 · 03/03/2023 21:44

PreparationPreparationPrep · 03/03/2023 20:30

Nice analogy... 😉But if they were very devious, they could have named changed after their dump. But I DIDN'T DO THAT.

Someone tried this on another thread and ended up disgracing themselves. Basically a name change failure. As if it wasn't embarrassing enough Then @AliceOlive comes along to make excuses for their behaviour just because they were part of the anti M squad.

Sorry Not sorry ....honestly you had to be there!

Mendacity becoming a Harkle or a Minsdor. Trust no-one !

If you like your royal news unsullied by debate, then the Reddit BRF is for you.

They are currently voting for the colour of the Coronation ribbon - green is storming is by a royal mile with 208 votes, whereas poor old brown gets 1 measly vote. If I wasn't banned, I would be doubling brown's share.

ROYAL FAMILY ORDER OF CHARLES III: What colour will The King choose for HIS ribbon? I go for green because of his engagement for the environment.

www.reddit.com/r/BRF/comments/11e7xnj/royal_family_order_of_charles_iii_what_colour/

vera99 · 03/03/2023 21:45

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 21:40

I publicly pointed out that a poster misidentified another poster, as soon as it happened. Similar user names, but not the same poster.

I supported the misidentified poster in doing so. I also explained why I knew it could not have been her. It was an egregious misidentification given the details.

I gave the other poster the benefit of doubt for the sake of harmony. I was clearly wrong and that proved itself out quickly and the wrong poster melted into a writing puddle of snakes.

I’m no hypocrite. I feel good about how I handled the whole thing. Thank you for the opportunity to rehash it.

Show quote history

Some forums have a rule about no cross thread beefs. It's a good one to keep order amongst the rabble !

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 21:53

I agree @vera99 but felt I needed to defend myself. The situation @PreparationPreparationPrep posted about was pretty awful and she unfairly put me on the wrong side of it.

704703hey · 03/03/2023 22:23

Roussette · 03/03/2023 19:41

Meghan spoke spitefully about Sammantha, Sammantha spoke spitefully about Meghan

Not quite on the same level as being banned from Twitter as talking about her half sister faking pregnancies, surrogates and her children being actors. Surely?

I didn't realise Samantha had done that - I find H&M irritating at times but dislike any talk about their children or moonbumps or non existence etc.

Wow I sound irritable 😅

skullbabe · 03/03/2023 22:29

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 19:58

You don't think Sunshine Sachs had the pull to get Samantha banned?

You may not have been paying attention to what was actually happening at Twitter. If you have any interest, Matt Taibbi has been very enlightening.

Show quote history

No the Twitter files investigation do not show large scale PR company influence on Twitter - political influence sure (as in - the publishing of Hunter Biden’s penis is not really in the public interest seeing as he’s not a public figure level of discussion) but not bog standard celebrity. So no Sunshine Sachs did not get Samantha banned. She did that all on her own.

Ohnonevermind · 03/03/2023 22:29

I don’t like talk of children either, I didn’t like how Meghan wanted to shame her sister by discussing how many different fathers her children had.

Both were spiteful and both crossed a line, once you’ve crossed it, I don’t know if it matters who crossed it further.

Meghan had money, fame and a prince who loves her. She should have stayed high.

Wheresthecheese · 03/03/2023 22:32

Ohnonevermind · 03/03/2023 22:29

I don’t like talk of children either, I didn’t like how Meghan wanted to shame her sister by discussing how many different fathers her children had.

Both were spiteful and both crossed a line, once you’ve crossed it, I don’t know if it matters who crossed it further.

Meghan had money, fame and a prince who loves her. She should have stayed high.

Well it certainly shows she’s no feminist. Along with the way she’s tried to drag Kate down into the mud.

704703hey · 03/03/2023 22:40

It's a shame they don't get on and support each other, I would have loved to have had a sister

AliceOlive · 03/03/2023 22:50

skullbabe · 03/03/2023 22:29

No the Twitter files investigation do not show large scale PR company influence on Twitter - political influence sure (as in - the publishing of Hunter Biden’s penis is not really in the public interest seeing as he’s not a public figure level of discussion) but not bog standard celebrity. So no Sunshine Sachs did not get Samantha banned. She did that all on her own.

Show quote history

Maybe not in Markle’s case but please don’t dismiss the Biden stuff being silenced as just being about some pornographic photos.

It was about much much more than than and very much an election interference.

My point was that once they started down that path, you can’t be sure of anything. Samantha Markle is a troll though. Anyone talking about anyone else’s children and parenting is a troll.