Has Jeremy Clarkson just proved Harry and Meghan right?

[Stopclutchingpearls]

On the radio it was discussing how Harry and Meghan said on Netflix that they got very upset in the past when newspapers would write horrible articles and the Royal Family institute would never have their backs and condone the articles in public.
so after the disgusting article that Jeremy wrote albeit his lame apology on Twitter, there has been no news as far as I am aware of the Royal Family saying violence written about Meghan etc is wrong.
so that being said haven’t they done what Meghan and Harry were moaning about that the Royal family never had their backs?

That’s why I said ‘perhaps,’ Lydia.

Just like you said ‘perhaps’

( But Lydia always was impetuous, and didn’t think things through).

www.thesun.co.uk/news/20708220/meghan-markle-monster-jeremy-clarkson/

Perfect guest for a private dinner with the Queen Consort ......

HAD a furious agreement with someone this week, and it got so out of hand, she crashed into a hedge.

We both agreed that Meghan Markle is an unhinged monster, but we couldn’t agree on just how awful she is.

We were dreaming up better and stronger insults, none of which can be published here, even though they’re all perfectly fair.

Until eventually, my friend became so lost in the insult thesaurus, she lost concentration and hit the hedge.

A man with no shame or morals , he was working up to his bilous hatred in steps with the Queen's funeral to cast his poisonous ire onto as an entre.

www.thesun.co.uk/news/19902699/meghan-markle-lose-war-royals-jeremy-clarkson/

Thank you for posting the earlier Dec anti meghan article. This didn't come to my attention as I don't read the sun but I can see now why they thought it would be fine to print since this older article received very little attention.

The police are already complicit in misogyny, Sarah Everard and the mocking of the dead sisters Bibaa and Nicole.

ITV has said they will happily keep him employed.

I'm writing to my male MP now to see if this yields anything.

I have a vision of JC and Piers tittering and writing the next, even worse, article just to see at what point they're stopped, unfortunately I suspect that point may never come.

I have a vision of JC and Piers tittering and writing the next, even worse, article just to see at what point they're stopped, unfortunately I suspect that point may never come.

Yep, unfortunately these people only have relevance when they spit out her name so they'll keep doing it; it gets them trending...sad fucks.

I’ve just ventured onto a FB thread about JC. I found the usual, uneducated, mysonogic male population cheering him on. But… Wow! I’m gobsmacked at the women commenting…. “Ah well, JC always says it as it is”, together with, “I love JC… He’s amazing! 💕” And then the “ Everyone is entitled to an opinion”.

Im truly gobsmacked tbh that anyone could endorse a 62 year old man publically announcing “his dream” of a woman parading, naked, through the town and having excrement thrown at them!

My only wish is that JC is bombarded with turds everytime he leaves his house from now on.

Whats good for the goose is good for the gander right?

Can those who defend JC say why please? Im truly baffled why anyone would defend him!

What, exactly, has H&M done wrong?

Can those who defend JC say why please? Im truly baffled why anyone would defend him!

They defend him because it's against Meghan. 100% that. They won't admit that of course.

(There are some decent anti Meghan posters on MN who have, quite rightly, condemned it. )

If it was against someone they liked, they would be all over this forum like a rash condemning it.
Imagine if it was Kate? Or Sophie?

She deserved it because she left.

Roussette
The fact anyone would excuse his article is really concerning, and probably goes some way to explain why it was read by countless people and still published.

I find H&M's behaviour annoying and would happily see the UK become a republic in due course, but there's absolutely no excusing Clarkson's awful piece about Meghan.

@Malariahilaria

Yes the met are not covered in glory.

I was also unaware of the other article.

They took on one of the most ancient and powererful family institution in the world bar none. May god have mercy on their souls.

JC attempts to curry favour with the Royals has backfired spectacularly. He must be furious
He has simply opened up a can of worms and caused them to come under even more intense scrutiny.
Even those who were ambivalent about the Sussexes now believe that H and M have been proved right
I still can’t get my head around the fact that Camilla attended a posh lunch with the man who had written a nasty misogynistic piece about MM in the Sun on the 23rd September
referring to Harry and his wife as ‘unhinged’. Describing Meghan as a ‘two bit’ actress who was ‘friendless’ . Then suggesting that Harry was effectively p.ssy whipped.
Horrible, horrible article.
Then he was emboldened by the fact that he got away with writing that piece of crap( and obviously he had lunch with his smoking buddy) , so saw fit to write another piece of misogynist crap. Trying desperately to appease his smoking buddy Camilla.
Fell on his own sword. Sound like something Shakespeare would have written.

He now needs to be sacked from the WWTBAM. There are many others that can do that job tbh

@RandomSunday

when I see comments like that it just tells me that they don't understand.
They have not for whatever reason joined up the dots or realised the wider implications of his article .

People that do get it and understand if course disgree with it because we don't want violence against women etc.

@Lampzade

I can't believe she went to a do with the absolute no 1 hate preacher of Megan...piers Morgan! He walked off air because he was ranting soooo much about her. .

Piers Morgan should have been enough to say, I can't attend, he's gunning for Megan as if she was his ex wife trying to take him to the cleaner!!

That's without Clarkson

When you've wrecked two marriages you are hardly likely to be a nice person whatever else you might be.

@ZeViteVitchofCwismas me neither !! Piers was practically frothing at the mouth over her when he had to walk off air.

But the palace rarely respond to such grubby articles -about any member of the royal family, so why should this, about a non-working member, be any different?

So basically…
…‘’If it’s not happening to me, I don’t see it.”

La la la la la la la eyes closed and fingers in ears).