@Inspecto Where is the heroism in modern monarchy? I’m going back to the history books when royals had a backbone and used their god-given voices for something meaningful. Crowns were once earned by the heroically worthy
I'm sorry but you've been reading fairy tales if this is your honest view of Royal history. The Monarchy has always protected itself, at any cost. The extreme actions of such self-protection are not heroic. Think incest and interbreeding (Cleopatra married both her brothers and then murdered them) imprisonment by royal family members, (Elizabeth I) burning of heretics (Charles II of Spain) public beheadings of family members & spouses (Mary Queen of Scots, some of King Henry V111's numerous wives.)
From the murder of Julius Caesar in 44 BC to the execution of the Romanovs in 1918, the most criminal behaviours imaginable have been part of the cycle of behaviour enacted by members of Royal households in order to protect the institutions to which they belong. Crowns were never "earned," they were seized, brutally and by murderous force in the pages of history.
Cleopatra VII murdered her younger sister Arsinoe IV in a power-struggle to become Pharaoh. The Duke of Burgundy (AKA John the Fearless) assassinated his cousin, Louis Duke of Orleans. Edward IV murdered his brother, George, Duke of Clarence. Queen Victoria is one of 14 listed Monarchs who experienced the side-effects of incest - again, a act widely condemned in modern society and in general but one that took place in Royal establishments to preserve the purity of the Royal bloodline.
All about survival, and institutionalised protection - nothing whatsoever to do with heroic endeavour.