Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Meghan & Harry Were Lying From The Start, Weren't They?

1000 replies

TheShellBeach · 15/12/2022 17:47

As per the thread title.

Right from the word go, Meghan and Harry were not telling the truth. About anything.

Now the Netflix series has come out it just proves it, over and over again.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
DownNative · 15/12/2022 21:08

britsabroad · 15/12/2022 19:27

I can't be bothered to list the lies right now but another poster @downnative has listed them on the other h&m thread.

Meghan Markle is effectively claimed that the Royal Family was racist in relation to her son and the titles/security issue.

Oprah: You certainly must have had some conversations with Harry about it and have your own suspicions as to why they didn’t want to make Archie a prince. What are . . .  what are those thoughts? Why do you think that is? Do you think it’s because of his race?

Meghan: (Sighs)

Oprah: And I know that’s a loaded question, but . . . 

Meghan: But I can give you an honest answer. In those months when I was pregnant, all around this same time . . .  so we have in tandem the conversation of ‘He won’t be given security, he’s not going to be given a title’ and also concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he’s born.

Shortly before this bit, Meghan claimed that during her pregnancy first time round "they wanted to change the convention for Archie".

It's not too difficult to find the actual Letters Patent that deals with this convention. Here's what it says:

"Now Know Ye that We of our especial grace certain knowledge and mere motion do hereby declare our Royal Will and Pleasure that the children of any Sovereign of these Realms and the children of the sons of any such Sovereign and the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales shall have and at all times hold and enjoy the style title or attribute of Royal Highness with their titular dignity of Prince or Princess prefixed to their respective Christian names or with their other titles of honour."

In other words, the Monarch's children will carry Prince/Princess titles. It further states that the sons of the Monarch can also give their own children said titles.

Finally, it states that the eldest living son of the Prince of Wales' children will also have these titles.

This convention goes back to 1917 and the Queen's father.

So, it was always going to be the case that Prince Harry's children would not have the Prince and Princess titles during the Queen's reign.

Lastly, it also states:

"Our Royal Will and Pleasure that the grandchildren of the sons of any such Sovereign in the direct male line (save only the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales) shall have and enjoy in all occasions the style and title enjoyed by the children of Dukes of these Our Realms."

Archie can inherit Harry's titles of Duke of Sussex (England), Earl of Dumbarton (Scotland) and Barony of Kilkeel (Northern Ireland).

As Prince, Harry knows all of this very well which raises questions about why he didn't bother to correct this one. After all, Meghan is alleging Archie was denied the Royal title of Prince due to racism.

And that's far from the case as the Letters Patent shows.

Since Harry and Meghan left out the crucial details around Royal titles, it makes you think what else are they hiding?

ThighMistress · 15/12/2022 21:09

The only reason for this documentary/book(s) is $$$$$$$.

If they are happy to have escaped, and they seem to have a fantastic life now, why bother? It seems so grubby to monetise the whole sorry affair, instead of just moving on.

If they had genuinely-held grievances, these could have been aired through more serious channels than Oprah and Netflix. And for no payment.

Candlemas · 15/12/2022 21:10

I don't think they are lying. They are telling what they see as the truth.

Candlemas · 15/12/2022 21:12

The only reason for this documentary/book(s) is $$$$$$$

Everyone needs money, and they can hardly go down the local job centre, can they?

DuchessOfPort · 15/12/2022 21:13

Seems like royals can wear similar colours to each other. See this evening for example and also this pic.

Meghan & Harry Were Lying From The Start, Weren't They?
TheShellBeach · 15/12/2022 21:14

Candlemas · 15/12/2022 21:12

The only reason for this documentary/book(s) is $$$$$$$

Everyone needs money, and they can hardly go down the local job centre, can they?

They're not exactly hard up.

OP posts:
ThighMistress · 15/12/2022 21:14

“They are telling what they see as the truth” Confused
Not the truth, then?

healthadvice123 · 15/12/2022 21:17

@Pemba what does one of you mean

pelargoniums · 15/12/2022 21:18

TheShellBeach · 15/12/2022 21:14

They're not exactly hard up.

They’re not hard up because they’ve made the media deals. They also have higher outgoings than most of us (disregarding their choice of home, Hermes blankets etc, which are all choices), what with the need for private security against death threats, etc. I’d be monetising my story for all it’s worth too if I had half the hate Meghan does.

healthadvice123 · 15/12/2022 21:21

@Nolosomi that in your basic life you have taken time to comment on

Loveinacandle · 15/12/2022 21:32

Are all these threads further RF plants…. It’s all very suspicious!

Nolosomi · 15/12/2022 21:36

@healthadvice123 ooh very clever 👏

DownNative · 15/12/2022 22:35

Meghan Markle also claimed:

"....the first member of colour in this family isn't being titled in the same way as other grandchildren would be."

Obviously claiming racism there.

On the contrary, Archie is really treated no differently to the Queen's grandchildren who aren't entitled to the Prince and Princess style.

Zara Tindall and Peter Phillips, for example, don't have this style. Zara is the Queen's eldest grandchild, by the way.

Furthermore, Prince Edward's children are NOT styled as Prince and Princess despite the Letters Patent of 1917. They are styled as children of the Earl - not HRH Prince and Princess.

Edward's children are the first to have the double barrelled Mountbatten-Windsor name.

Harry and Meghan's son, Archie, is treated in the exact same way as Edward's children AND he carries the same double barrelled surname as they do.

Here again, Meghan's implied claim of racism doesn't stand up. And that does cast enough doubt on their other claim of racism regarding a senior Royal whose identity they say they have no intention of disclosing.

Of course, Meghan incorrectly referred to Archie as one of the Queen's grandchildren. He was a great-grandson of the late Queen since his father, Harry was her grandson.

RosettaStormer · 15/12/2022 23:09

Candlemas · 15/12/2022 21:10

I don't think they are lying. They are telling what they see as the truth.

I believe that to be the case too. They just see everything through a distorted lens based on their persecution complex. It’s really quite sad.

SandyY2K · 15/12/2022 23:21

The TRUTH has come out. It's refreshing to hear.

mommydragonn · 15/12/2022 23:23

I believe episode 4... if only Meghan was given the time and chance... she would've won over lots of people.... some people felt threatened by her .... plain and simple. And Harry was the spare... no need to protect him and his little family. They were perfect to throw under the bus.

RosettaStormer · 15/12/2022 23:32

pelargoniums · 15/12/2022 21:18

They’re not hard up because they’ve made the media deals. They also have higher outgoings than most of us (disregarding their choice of home, Hermes blankets etc, which are all choices), what with the need for private security against death threats, etc. I’d be monetising my story for all it’s worth too if I had half the hate Meghan does.

They weren’t hard up anyway! He inherited millions from his Mother and no doubt loads more from both his grandparents. Charles also supported him for months when they were in Canada.

SandyY2K · 15/12/2022 23:34

I believe that to be the case too. They just see everything through a distorted lens based on their persecution complex. It’s really quite sad.

I guess they just made up the racist headlines. Or falsely relayed their experiences about plans being leaked.

They were the ones being persecuted, but it's easier for people to believe the opposite.

Just typical.

RosettaStormer · 15/12/2022 23:38

The racist headlines were very few and confined to the tabloids. That doesn’t make it OK, but the coverage was overwhelmingly positive at the beginning. Camilla has had far worse and Kate was given a hard time too.

whoamI00 · 15/12/2022 23:44

I agree with you, OP.

Aspiringmatriarch · 16/12/2022 00:09

DownNative · 15/12/2022 21:00

Since the Oprah interview with Meghan and Harry has cropped up again, here is several questionable claims they made to Oprah that clearly aren't true.

Claim: "I guess the highlight for me is sticking him on the back of a bicycle in his little baby seat and taking him on bike rides which is something I was never able to do when I was young. I can sit him on the back and he’s got his arms out and he’s like ‘whoah’.” - Prince Harry

Truth: Harry did go on bike rides with his father at various ages. Photos available online.

Claim: Meghan: “[But] you know, three days before our wedding, we got married. No-one knows that.

“We called the Archbishop and we just said, ‘Look, this thing, this spectacle is for the world but we want our union between us.’ So, the vows that we have framed in our room are just the two of us in our backyard with the Archbishop of Canterbury.”

Harry added: “Just the three of us.”

Truth: Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby: “The legal wedding was on the Saturday. I signed the wedding certificate, which is a legal document, and I would have committed a serious criminal offence if I signed it knowing it was false.”

Claim: Oprah: "After their move, Harry and Meghan say security normally provided by the royal family was cut off.”

Harry: “I never thought that I would have my security removed, because I was born into this position. I inherited the risk. So that was a shock to me. That was what completely changed the whole plan.”

Truth: Only a strict few members of the Royal Family were entitled to 24/7 protection at the time of the Oprah interview. These are:

the Queen and Prince Philip
Charles and wife Camilla Duchess of Cornwall
William and Kate and their kids

Working Royals are entitled to protection ONLY when undertaking official Royal duties. Princess Anne and Prince Edward are two examples.

Non-working members of the Royal Family are NOT entitled to official protection. Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice as well as the Queen's eldest grandchild, Zara Tindal are examples.

"Once Harry and Meghan step down as working royals, they become high net worth individuals/A-list celebrities but that doesn’t entitle them to taxpayer-funded security. Elton John has to pay for his own security and so do Harry and Meghan.” - Simon Morgan, a former royal protection officer.

Royal Protection officers are funded by the British Taxpayer.

Both Harry and Oprah clearly pointed the finger at the Royal Family regarding the loss of Royal Protection officers for Harry and Meghan.

In truth, London Metropolitan Police’s Royal and VIP Executive Committee make the decisions over who is entitled to Protection.

And who isn't.

Harry knew very well that ceasing to be a working Royal would absolutely mean losing the elite protection. After all, it was never a secret that various non-working Royals do NOT get armed protection.

So, why would he and his wife?

The truth was clearly distorted by Oprah, Meghan and Harry.

Claim: Meghan: "You couldn’t just go. You couldn’t. I mean, you have to understand, as well, when I joined that family, that was the last time, until we came here, that I saw my passport, my driver’s licence, my keys. All that gets turned over. I didn’t see any of that any more."

Truth: For security reasons, the passports of each member of the Royal Family is looked after until they require them for international travel. That's just commonsense.

To Oprah, Meghan claimed she never saw her passport again until "we came here" which would be California. However, this is clearly a lie as she required her passport for travelling to Canada upon leaving the UK.

And, in 2019, required her passport for travel to the USA for a rather extravagant baby shower which was attended by many of her friends.

All members of the Royal Family require a passport for ALL travel where its required.

Except for the Queen since it's issued in her name.

As proven here: www.royal.uk/passports

Not a single one of these examples are lies. People can have their own perspective on their own lives for goodness sake.

Bike rides: I assume he's much more free to just go and do things like this with Archie and be spontaneous and a hands-on parent.

Wedding: a lot of people have more than one ceremony. The private one she mentioned was obviously not the legal one but so what, it was obviously significant to them and felt like the moment they made that marriage commitment.

Security: Harry is absolutely right, he did inherit the risk by being born to the heir to the throne. And we know there were threats against Meghan. He is obviously protective and felt the risks to them is high enough to warrant security. Fair enough, he's being protective. If Diana had had her royal protection officers she would never have died in that crash.

Passport: you've confirmed that what Meghan said was true. It's a shame you lack the imagination to understand that that must have felt very strange for a woman in her late thirties used to being completely independent. Travel arrangements would have all been made by staff at the palace.

lemmein · 16/12/2022 00:11

RosettaStormer · 15/12/2022 23:38

The racist headlines were very few and confined to the tabloids. That doesn’t make it OK, but the coverage was overwhelmingly positive at the beginning. Camilla has had far worse and Kate was given a hard time too.

Think about what you're saying....'very few....confined to the tabloids'  It should never happen, it's never ok, and shouldn't be excused because you consider it only a little bit racist.

It's fucking appalling that in 2022 we are still not completely comfortable with condemning this shit. I don't care if it was a 2inch column on the 10th page of a tabloid, it's abhorrent that any racism is tolerated in national newspapers.

dancingqueen123 · 16/12/2022 00:14

Just. Don't. Watch. It. Problem. Solved. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Spectre8 · 16/12/2022 00:39

lemmein · 16/12/2022 00:11

Think about what you're saying....'very few....confined to the tabloids'  It should never happen, it's never ok, and shouldn't be excused because you consider it only a little bit racist.

It's fucking appalling that in 2022 we are still not completely comfortable with condemning this shit. I don't care if it was a 2inch column on the 10th page of a tabloid, it's abhorrent that any racism is tolerated in national newspapers.

And its not just racism but hiw misogynistic are the press, constantly dragging down women, with meghan saying she forced Harry to leave, she is causing drama etc. All those nasty misogynistic terms splashed across headlines to put a woman in her place.

HerReputationMadeItDifficultToProceed · 16/12/2022 04:56

It's so depressing that women talk like this about other women. The call is coming from inside the house.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.