Netflix prog chat

[clyspa]

It's landed - 3 episodes with what I assume is 3 next week.

We are not responsible for what others did.

Exactly, whether it's Princess Michael of Kent, or Prince Harry.

So now they are saying ‘privacy’ isn’t what they wanted when they left their royal duties because people have called them out for exploiting every aspect of their relationship and their families for money.

Exactly. You'd think we still traded slaves on the Guinea coast and owned Rhodesia.

If the Commonwealth is "Empire 2.0" why have your wedding veil embroidered with all the flowers of Commonwealth countries?
Why accept a role in it?
Why call your child the pet name of the Commonwealth leader for the past 70 years? Genuinely, I do not understand.

Often seems a lot like revenge to me.

I would !

If you continue to benefit financially then you are answerable

Me neither Maireas
It is most puzzling.

I’d have distanced myself in so many ways. Not just flitting.

The filming of everything leaves an unpleasant aftertaste. I’m with those who wish them a long happy life together.

The alternative for H is almost unthinkable. Although you reap what you sow.

The curtsey thing has fucked me right off and any sympathy I had for them is fast disappearing.

I don’t think any of us do. I don’t think she understands herself.

There is a difference between commonwealth and realms

Realms are few now and more rejecting the monarchy each year

There is nothing wrong with countries banding together - in fact countries which were never linked to Britain have joined the new commonwealth

There are lots of questions about why Chuck should be automatically head of the commonwealth just because Mummy said so though

Because they're completely FOS. And as ever in these discussions, the glaring contradictions are pushed aside in order to pursue the narrative.

There are lots of questions about why Chuck should be automatically head of the commonwealth just because Mummy said so though

Questions that were discussed and resolved only a few years ago

There is nothing wrong with countries banding together - in fact countries which were never linked to Britain have joined the new commonwealth

Well presumably if they've chosen to join the Commonwealth they're fine with the British monarch being the head of it. They could always create their own group of countries and call it something else and elect another leader?

And make a film all about it.

Meghan claims to be a strong independent woman. She's more than capable of biding her time, testing the waters, finding out for herself.

She chose not to.

Harry and Meghan are benefitting from the abuse, exploitation and murder of the Native Americans, by that token.

If Harry is still funded by the monarchy then he is answerable as all the royals are

Is he ?
( genuine question )

theconversation.com/amp/five-ways-the-monarchy-has-benefited-from-colonialism-and-slavery-179911

I haven't seen the programmes (no Netflix) and have only just now seen a clip of Meghan "curtseying".

I know a lot of people have said she was just making fun of herself not doing it properly, but it really did look like she was ridiculing the custom to me.
She looked like she was taking part in "Wayne's World": "We're not worthy".

If she thought it was a ridiculous practice, perhaps she should have said she would rather not participate in it and stood by her principles.

Harry's quote was interesting:
"How do you explain that you bow to your grandmother and that you will need to curtsy - especially to an American, like that’s weird"

Just as weird as people bowing to him.
Hopefully he specifically asks people he encounters not to engage in this weird custom.

So, Meghan, your Dad posed for pictures and took money for them. And you are selling your "truth" on Netflix. What's the difference?

Meghan acts all the time, every time. Badly.
Harry is verifying that he really is a clueless over privileged twit.

And the engagement story.....in the original engagement interview, I thought he went down on one knee in the kitchen. But here they say it was outside on a picnic rug, so which is it? And who the hell (apart of course from Meghan) live streams a proposal anyway.

I wonder if they have started goading the royal family even more because they are no getting the reaction they hoped for. They want a proper war but they are ignored so they go one level up in provocation.

I'm interested in next week because they made a point of saying there were no interviews after August, ie before the queen died. Why would that be important? I sense juice stuff is coming.

Honestly, the first 3 seem a bit of a damp squib. He's always complained about the media. It just reads like posters moaning about their mils, petty and one-sided stuff. Its just a schmaltzy, drawn out love story. But why not? It's Christmas.

Have they done Uvalde yet?

No - and I've been waiting for that, remembering the comments made on here when someone dared to suggest the cameras present were from Netflix

@Novella4
H & M are not funded by the privy purse (tax payer funded). They are entitled to close protection officers on RF business. They are not working members of the Royal family.
Their titles are a gift of our late Queen. They cannot be 'stripped' and have no income attached. If their security is £400k pm they now have the funds to pay it for twenty years. Their story is their opinion. We can watch or not. We do not know them or pay for them. Nothing to see here.

'Their story is their opinion. We can watch or not. We do not know them or pay for them. Nothing to see here.'z

So Thomas Markle's media blabbing was just his opinion too. We don't pay for him, we can watch or not yes? Public oversharing is all just super.

I really hope an ex member of staff spills the beans on this deluded pair and 'shares their opinion' on their sneery behaviour. The Commonwealth is Empire 2.0?! Yet she had all the emblems of the countries embroidered on her wedding outfit. Make your minds up!