I can't get excited about her not recognising George (presumably H given it was 30 years ago) Bush, at the time the most powerful person in the world. It's actually funny, I think. What happened the other day is different and isn't.
It's funny up to a point. But actually, is that the image of the UK that anyone wants to project?
The idea that someone so close to the Queen that she is a trusted companion who is let loose on receptions for visiting heads of state would be so unabashedly ignorant is jarring. She was in her 50s back then. Is that old enough to hide behind age?
The question, 'What do you do for a living?' is not one anyone should ask a person who is a member of an American presidential party. How did she think that question was appropriate? Did she see no difference between a reception for an American Presidential party and members of the Young Farmers Association? Did SH not know who the quickly assembled reception was for? Did nobody think to give a little description of the honoured guests and their positions to the household members who were mingling among them? The idea that the royal household could approach a reception for the world's most powerful man with such amateurishness is really gobsmacking.
It bespeaks an underlying arrogance, the arrogant attitude that the RF (or the British upper classes) are so far above everyone else that they don't have to bother prepping the people who will be mixing with the American President.
There's arrogance in the racist incident too - in the touching of Ms Fulani's hair, in the massive entitlement that lies behind the persistent questioning of an invited guest, and in the patronising "Oh, I knew we'd get there in the end".