Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and Meghan - lies?

1000 replies

FurAndFeathers · 28/10/2022 19:51

Ok I’m keeping my fingers crossed this thread will not descend into an unsubstantiated bun fight! Please bear with me.

I’m definitely no Royalist, and am pretty ambivalent about H and M but from the little I’ve read they seem to have been treated pretty badly. However I keep seeing on other threads here that their claims have all be proven to be lies, which would make me much less sympathetic to them. But I can’t find any verification for this.

So I’m asking more knowledgeable posters - what lies specifically have H&M told and where’s the evidence to the contrary please?

thank you

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Roussette · 30/12/2022 19:39

Glindara · 30/12/2022 19:32

Let me tidy that up a bit for you:

And my point is that they probably never wanted to resolve anything either quietly with the family behind closed doors or publicly to bring about transformative institutional change……..they just wanted to personally monetise this opportunity - and they have succeeded in that.

How do you know that? I'm glad you said 'probably' !

Could it be, they were unhappy with how they were treated by the MSM, they felt unsupported and just left. Nothing to do with monetising.

Just a thought.

You are saying an opinion. Not fact.

Hope that's a good 'tidy' !

Glindara · 30/12/2022 19:44

Roussette · 30/12/2022 19:39

How do you know that? I'm glad you said 'probably' !

Could it be, they were unhappy with how they were treated by the MSM, they felt unsupported and just left. Nothing to do with monetising.

Just a thought.

You are saying an opinion. Not fact.

Hope that's a good 'tidy' !

Yes it was an opinion and a probably about what went on behind closed doors with the RF - but for completeness I will just tidy up your bit because it is indeed a fact not an opinion that they have since gone on to monetised (rather lucratively) the family rifts since they left.

Roussette · 30/12/2022 19:46

Glindara · 30/12/2022 19:44

Yes it was an opinion and a probably about what went on behind closed doors with the RF - but for completeness I will just tidy up your bit because it is indeed a fact not an opinion that they have since gone on to monetised (rather lucratively) the family rifts since they left.

Quite a 'tidy' there!

Yes. Just opinion.

FurAndFeathers · 30/12/2022 19:47

Glindara · 30/12/2022 19:32

Let me tidy that up a bit for you:

And my point is that they probably never wanted to resolve anything either quietly with the family behind closed doors or publicly to bring about transformative institutional change……..they just wanted to personally monetise this opportunity - and they have succeeded in that.

Question still stands - how do you know what they probably did or didn’t do?

OP posts:
FurAndFeathers · 30/12/2022 19:49

Blip · 30/12/2022 18:11

@FurAndFeathers
"To be fair you don’t seem to appreciate any view that doesn’t align exactly with your own 😁"

Such a rude and immature thing to say.

Oh you’re back to name calling and personal attacks as your primary contribution

good-oh - crack on

OP posts:
Coxspurplepippin · 30/12/2022 19:49

'And my point is that they probably never wanted to resolve anything either quietly with the family behind closed doors or publicly to bring about transformative institutional change……..they just wanted to personally monetise this opportunity - and they have succeeded in that.'

I would say that the filming/recording of every aspect of their lives, as seen in the NF, what, documentary, docudrama, drama certainly suggests they had an eye to future monetising.

FurAndFeathers · 30/12/2022 19:52

Glindara · 30/12/2022 19:44

Yes it was an opinion and a probably about what went on behind closed doors with the RF - but for completeness I will just tidy up your bit because it is indeed a fact not an opinion that they have since gone on to monetised (rather lucratively) the family rifts since they left.

So you actually have no idea what they did or didn’t try behind closed doors before eventually leaving the roles and lifestyle that brought them safety and privilege?

just confirmation bias and creative writing then.

OP posts:
BethJ62 · 30/12/2022 19:52

@Roussette
“Could it be, they were unhappy with how they were treated by the MSM, they felt unsupported and just left. Nothing to do with monetising.”

They left because they didn’t get the arrangement they wanted . No matter how many times people try to portray H and M as victims fleeing the beastly U.K. press and Royal Family , the fact remains that they didn’t want to leave ( as per their statement in early 2020.

FurAndFeathers · 30/12/2022 19:53

Coxspurplepippin · 30/12/2022 19:49

'And my point is that they probably never wanted to resolve anything either quietly with the family behind closed doors or publicly to bring about transformative institutional change……..they just wanted to personally monetise this opportunity - and they have succeeded in that.'

I would say that the filming/recording of every aspect of their lives, as seen in the NF, what, documentary, docudrama, drama certainly suggests they had an eye to future monetising.

Quite possibly.

that doesn’t mean they didn’t try very hard to address the challenges they faced and the institutional racism they experienced before they left.
Its simply an assumption.

OP posts:
Serenster · 30/12/2022 19:54

…she sent an email via Knauf with some background information. That's all.

The emails sent/received by Jason Knauf only cover the period from when he was their Director of Communications, which ended at the end of 2018. His evidence was that during that time he and the Sussexes discussed the book on a routine basis, and he passed onto Scobie the notes the Duchess drafted for him.

That evidence covered the start of the Sussexes relationship with the author Omid Scobie. It is quite clear that after that point they became much closer - a few months later Scobie was given exclusives around Archie’s names and titles etc after his birth, for example, and he became an integral part of their team, as he remains. And the book evolved from a Meghan biography into an account of their departure.

So it is quite clear that the evidence given by Knauf only showed the very start of the relationship. The content of Finding Freedom makes it quite clear that he was given far far more information from Meghan than her notes about the Markle family.

FurAndFeathers · 30/12/2022 19:55

BethJ62 · 30/12/2022 19:52

@Roussette
“Could it be, they were unhappy with how they were treated by the MSM, they felt unsupported and just left. Nothing to do with monetising.”

They left because they didn’t get the arrangement they wanted . No matter how many times people try to portray H and M as victims fleeing the beastly U.K. press and Royal Family , the fact remains that they didn’t want to leave ( as per their statement in early 2020.

Incredible how posters on Mumsnet absolutely KNOW the confidential inner conversations of the Royal family.
remarkable really!

OP posts:
PicturesOfDogs · 30/12/2022 19:57

FurAndFeathers · 30/12/2022 19:06

Yes fair point - there probably wouldn’t be anywhere near this much speculation if they’d been clearer with their grievances (on some issues at least) or alternatively kept quiet if they weren’t willing to name and shame entirely

This was my issue with the docuseries.
Lots of vague insinuations and talks of how they felt situations were, but no facts to back it up.

Lots of ‘they’ did this, and ‘they’ wanted this to happen, but who is they?
And what did they do? Show us evidence! Not just how you felt in general, but actual examples. Is ‘they’ the family? The ‘institution’? The media? The ‘men in grey suits’? Who are you talking about?

Even the few examples given were vague and without substance.
My brother screamed and shouted - about what?
My father said things that weren’t true - such as? Give us an example!
Look at this text from my brother - well, what does it say?
My grandfathers funeral was spent with them going on about the ‘misunderstanding’ of the situation- what situation? What misunderstanding?

There was 6 hours of this, absolutely nothing of substance.
Someone else said it perfectly on another thread - Shit or get off the pot!

Roussette · 30/12/2022 19:58

BethJ62 · 30/12/2022 19:52

@Roussette
“Could it be, they were unhappy with how they were treated by the MSM, they felt unsupported and just left. Nothing to do with monetising.”

They left because they didn’t get the arrangement they wanted . No matter how many times people try to portray H and M as victims fleeing the beastly U.K. press and Royal Family , the fact remains that they didn’t want to leave ( as per their statement in early 2020.

If I felt unsupported, I would probably do the same. Harry said in the NF series (if you've watched it?) they offered different possibilities. Yes I agree the UK press was 'beastly' (a bit of a mild term for the vile press to be honest)

Roussette · 30/12/2022 20:00

FurAndFeathers · 30/12/2022 19:55

Incredible how posters on Mumsnet absolutely KNOW the confidential inner conversations of the Royal family.
remarkable really!

Lol. Exactly!

Serenster · 30/12/2022 20:00

Incredible how posters on Mumsnet absolutely KNOW the confidential inner conversations of the Royal family.

We don’t need to speculate about their reasons for leaving in January 2020. They set it out in great detail on their SussexRoyal website. They wanted to carve out a progressive new role that left them free to earn a private income (something they were at pains to point out they were currently banned from doing) while still proudly representing the royal family and collaborating with the Queen.

So yes, monetising their positions was front and centre in their website statements. There was a whole page on their new financial arrangements.

Coxspurplepippin · 30/12/2022 20:02

Harry and Meghan left the UK after they'd been married barely 18 months. I'm not sure they gave it much time to address the challenges they faced - the move must have been planned for some time prior to them actually going to Canada too.

As far as people knowing the conversations which took place, they have said they wanted the 'in/out' version - to support the Queen but be able to make money fund themselves. That's not confidential, that's what Harry and Meghan actually said.

Ohnonevermind · 30/12/2022 20:03

@Serenster

along with ‘service is universal’ and no-one owns ‘royal’ flashes of petulance.

tells us all we need to know

Samcro · 30/12/2022 20:04

Why do people call her markle?
never hear Kate called Middleton.
i don’t know Sophie’s surname

Ohnonevermind · 30/12/2022 20:06

@Samcro

kate is regularly referred to as Middleton on threads ?

Roussette · 30/12/2022 20:06

Samcro · 30/12/2022 20:04

Why do people call her markle?
never hear Kate called Middleton.
i don’t know Sophie’s surname

It's just derogatory. Harkles. MeAgain. Meeegain.
And I've heard a helluva lot worse on here as far as names for them. It's dehumanising them
Pathetic.

Roussette · 30/12/2022 20:07

Ohnonevermind · 30/12/2022 20:06

@Samcro

kate is regularly referred to as Middleton on threads ?

Never ever 'Middleton'.

Kate Middleton, yes.

Glindara · 30/12/2022 20:09

Coxspurplepippin · 30/12/2022 19:49

'And my point is that they probably never wanted to resolve anything either quietly with the family behind closed doors or publicly to bring about transformative institutional change……..they just wanted to personally monetise this opportunity - and they have succeeded in that.'

I would say that the filming/recording of every aspect of their lives, as seen in the NF, what, documentary, docudrama, drama certainly suggests they had an eye to future monetising.

Probably!

FurAndFeathers · 30/12/2022 20:11

Serenster · 30/12/2022 20:00

Incredible how posters on Mumsnet absolutely KNOW the confidential inner conversations of the Royal family.

We don’t need to speculate about their reasons for leaving in January 2020. They set it out in great detail on their SussexRoyal website. They wanted to carve out a progressive new role that left them free to earn a private income (something they were at pains to point out they were currently banned from doing) while still proudly representing the royal family and collaborating with the Queen.

So yes, monetising their positions was front and centre in their website statements. There was a whole page on their new financial arrangements.

That’s not what people are speculating about though

OP posts:
MarshaMelrose · 30/12/2022 20:15

Ohnonevermind · 30/12/2022 20:06

@Samcro

kate is regularly referred to as Middleton on threads ?

I've never seen her referred to as Middleton.

Ohnonevermind · 30/12/2022 20:18

@MarshaMelrose

I thought the poster meant using their single surname,

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread