Meghan Markle ANL court appeal. Thread 2.

[catinboots123]

For those that are interested - I know I am.

Does anyone know when the appeal judgement will be made.

Justin Bieber has a song called peaches, which is about the green stuff called peaches, I never knew!! After watching the video he does look like he smokes it a lot, sorry, complete de rail there.

I will link something at some stage @Puzzledandpissedoff, but truthfully, I would have to trawl the net for it, because I dis see it. She was alone in that video.

But to give you an idea here she is explaining he circumstances. Please watch the whole thing it's short. Sorry, it's just the DM so far.

www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1442371/Meghan-Markle-s-niece-talks-growing-abusive-mother.html

Also, what she says about MM and Sam relationship.

www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1442299/Meghan-Markle-s-niece-speaks-against-mother-s-tell-all.html

Harrowing to listen to as it is. Proper child abuse from Samantha.
I would like to hear your views on it.

Surprised none of the DM readers on here, have not picked it up, and have so much sympathy for Samantha.

She didn't experience any racism from the RF. She was very clear that they were all welcoming to her

I wouldn't go quite that far, madison; even though there's now good reason to question Meghan's account of anything, any racism might have started later

Yet again we simply can't know, but I expect the RF themselves do. Dysfunctional as they are, they'd have to be quite mad not to have asked for the details of such a serious accusation - though if there's any real basis to it we'll certainly never hear about it from that source

I just hope, having shot their mouths off, that H&M had some credible answers for them ...

Samantha is not a good role model with, her trashing MM in the press is just as bad as H&M trashing his family, so you'll get no arguments defending Sam from me.

The thing is though that Sam is not involved in this in anyway. They lied to the COURT, they admitted it, the fact that Sam is not a nice person is irrelevant.

You see, just because Sam trashed her in the media does not excuse lying to everyone, particularly a court of law.

But you never explain her faults and mistakes. I could writes pages about my own faults and mistakes but you cannot find one for Meghan. That's what I find bizarre and intriguing. Is it because she is very beautiful?

What on earth are you on about? Do you honestly honestly think I am as shallow and pathetic as that?
You have never ever asked me about her faults and mistakes, not once.

I have said countless times they don't help themselves, I have said countless times I don't think they should've done the OW interview. But thinking I am pro Meghan 'because she is very beautiful' is beyond bizarre.

I agree Puzzled. I thought that the palace reply to the OW interview suggests that the Queen knows who the Sussexes were talking about.

Think the weed guy is the nephew

Ah - fair do's; as I say, I get confused with them all

As for weed being legal in SoCal, from too many of them I've met I'd say it was compulsory ... and that's coming from someone who loves the place with a passion

Well, I would be mad if I'd spent time defending them against the allegation that they collaborated with FF, only to find out they were lying. I'm curious as to why you don't feel a bit betrayed.

Why on earth would anyone feel betrayed? We're talking about an email being forgotten or glossed over, giving background information for an exceptionally silly book which by the looks of things neither Harry nor Meghan really wanted anything to do with. If it's this terrible crime posters seem to think it is then the courts will deal with that accordingly. I'm more interested in how the Queen is doing at the moment (not looking good, sadly) and the far more serious allegations of financial and sexual impropriety against other members of the Royal family, than in whether Meghan sent an email or said something mean about her batshit sister. I like them, plenty don't. They're two human beings with faults like anyone else 🤷‍♀️.

I kind of think something was mentioned about any future children's skin colour, but I doubt it was personal. It makes sense that at some point it was discussed in terms of security threats. As in will those prone to racist views create a security threat should any children be born with darker skin.

I think M&H were/are angry and have brought up many things to give an impression that they were mistreated without giving the full story.

Exactly Aspiring

@Roussette

But you never explain her faults and mistakes. I could writes pages about my own faults and mistakes but you cannot find one for Meghan. That's what I find bizarre and intriguing. Is it because she is very beautiful?

What on earth are you on about? Do you honestly honestly think I am as shallow and pathetic as that?
You have never ever asked me about her faults and mistakes, not once.

I have said countless times they don't help themselves, I have said countless times I don't think they should've done the OW interview. But thinking I am pro Meghan 'because she is very beautiful' is beyond bizarre.

You have said she has made mistakes but never specify what they are or comment on them. Which gives the impression that you think she is absolutely infallible.

I have said countless times they don't help themselves, I have said countless times I don't think they should've done the OW interview. I know. But that is so generalised that it's meaningless.

@Aspiringmatriarch

Well, I would be mad if I'd spent time defending them against the allegation that they collaborated with FF, only to find out they were lying. I'm curious as to why you don't feel a bit betrayed.

Why on earth would anyone feel betrayed? We're talking about an email being forgotten or glossed over, giving background information for an exceptionally silly book which by the looks of things neither Harry nor Meghan really wanted anything to do with. If it's this terrible crime posters seem to think it is then the courts will deal with that accordingly. I'm more interested in how the Queen is doing at the moment (not looking good, sadly) and the far more serious allegations of financial and sexual impropriety against other members of the Royal family, than in whether Meghan sent an email or said something mean about her batshit sister. I like them, plenty don't. They're two human beings with faults like anyone else 🤷‍♀️.

Have you read the book? If you had it would be evident that they were VERY involved with it.

@Aspiringmatriarch, did you miss the emails openly discussing that they had to make it look like they had nothing to do with it. The public can never know, I think the phrase was?

@Puzzledandpissedoff

She didn't experience any racism from the RF. She was very clear that they were all welcoming to her

I wouldn't go quite that far, madison; even though there's now good reason to question Meghan's account of anything, any racism might have started later

Yet again we simply can't know, but I expect the RF themselves do. Dysfunctional as they are, they'd have to be quite mad not to have asked for the details of such a serious accusation - though if there's any real basis to it we'll certainly never hear about it from that source

I just hope, having shot their mouths off, that H&M had some credible answers for them ...

She was clear that everyone had been very welcoming to her and she said no one had been racist to her but they had commented to Harry on the baby's colour on different occasions whilst she was pregnant. Harry said it had been one occasion before they were married. They disagreed but Harry was there and she wasn't.

Thanks for making me watch Mail links, rubics (!!) though I'll let you off because even they're not responsible for what someone else clearly said

Absolutely hideous content of course, though again in fairness it's an account with no opportunity for input from the accused. All in all though, I can't say I'm surprised that Harry seems to have met nobody but Doria before the wedding ... who knows what someone might have said to put him off?

Not AN email, loads of emails spanning months, telling Knauff exactly what they wanted in the book. One from Harry to Knauf saying "if you're not going to tell them XYZ, then can I".

Puzzled
I've just said about a mistake in my post... the doing of the OW interview. Because I could've guessed the outcome.
I don't make assumptions about what you think, you shouldn't with me.
I don't think she is infallible at all.
I do think she gets a raw deal on MN and I'm continually surprised about it... (cue outrage about that statement)

derxa What does it matter what I think?

I think it's odd you dislike her so much but I try not to make posts personal.
If you want me to do a character assassination of Meghan to justify my existence on threads. Sorry. No can do.

@Aspiringmatriarch, did you miss the emails openly discussing that they had to make it look like they had nothing to do with it. The public can never know, I think the phrase was?

I've read it, and no, there was no such phrase. The comment you might be thinking of is Meghan talking about if the letter were leaked? Something 'words I could never speak publicly'.

derxa What does it matter what I think?I think it's odd you dislike her so much but I try not to make posts personal.If you want me to do a character assassination of Meghan to justify my existence on threads. Sorry. No can do.
I don't dislike her particularly, I'm just intrigued. I don't want a character assassination. It's just that you treat Harry and Meghan like two slightly naughty but loveable children. Meghan's 40 and Harry's only a few years younger.

Not the letter, the book.

There's tonnes of emails between Knauf & Meghan and Harry. There's one in which they talk about making sure no one finds out they had anything to do with it.

An email from Meghan which has a list of topics that should be included in the book.

Read them, they actively talk about misleading the public.

Does anyone have a link to the emails please?

I'm very surprised there are no angry posts about being misled by them

It's not for me to speak for how others might feel, but I can't be the only one who wonders if the absence of some of their more vociferous supporters says a lot ...

That's your take on it, your prerogative.

The trouble is derxa any minute now, someone will come on here suggesting that 'the usual suspects' are derailing the thread (i.e. me being one of them) so it's best if we wrap this up now, especially as this thread is not about me, but when questions are directed at me, like you have just done, I feel obliged to answer.

I'll leave it there.

@PickupaPenguin8, if it helps, I can give you my view on mistakes she's made.

I find her writing style quite embarrassingly juvenile, I think she doesn't always quite get it right sartorially, and I think Archewell is not a great name and doesn't yet have a very clear purpose.