Harry's latest ventures

[Viviennemary]

Now being reported in the Daily Express that Harry is working on a new tell all documtary about royal life. This is according to his biographer Angela Levin. And even more disclosures about the royal family are forthcoming. Is this going to go on for years. We shall have to wait and sed. I think its very very wrong of him.

@HeadNorth

Yeah but no one really gives a toot about Beatrice do they? The solitary thread about her pregnancy has a desultory number of posts. But any thread with H& M in the title swiftly fills up and there are heaps of them. It is H& M who's draw the crowds.

They're not pop stars and were members of the Royal Family. We paid for their 'spectacle directly or indirectly. The arrogance is astounding.

I am very happy for Beatrice. But she's not a drama queen, so won't make a big issue.

It’s been said on here before, Oprah is an incredible business woman. All praise to Oprah. She’s so astute, she knows a good story and puts the leg work into getting it.
This has been years in the making for her.
She really knows how to make money. It must feel as if she has the scoop of the century. Incredible.

@RubyViolet

It’s been said on here before, Oprah is an incredible business woman. All praise to Oprah. She’s so astute, she knows a good story and puts the leg work into getting it. This has been years in the making for her. She really knows how to make money. It must feel as if she has the scoop of the century. Incredible.

That's why I personally was disappointed with the quality of the interview - she just accepted everything that she was told.

There isnt much to say about Beatrice. She looks very happy. But if she started giving interviews aboug how much her father's behaviour had impacted her life. Or spoke about her parents marriage and divorce there would be plenty to say. But she doesn't becsuse its a private matter.

Beatrice obviously wanted to start a family asap, given she's already expecting. Who knows when a bigger wedding could've happened?

I have two DCs of friends... one of them has gone ahead and had a quiet wedding. The other who cancelled twice last year wants the big shebang and is waiting until 2022.
It's all about choice.

The fact she had a smaller wedding is because she wanted to.

It may have been the scoop of the century in some aspects.

But to not pick up on the small but significant inconsistencies (e.g asking to explain what they meant by first wedding and also asking why they both had different recollections regarding the time frame about the baby comments) was remiss.

For me, so much more could have been asked and wasn’t.

I think O could well have put in a huge amount of legwork to get the couple to speak to her. But it is a pity she didn’t get more leeway with the questions.

And also a pity that the answers didn’t look like a surprise. Going ‘wow’ and doing a open mouth didn’t quite cut it.

@Blossomtoes

The CofE changed their stance In 2002 - C&C married in 2005. The reason is here.

www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/amp29309328/prince-charles-camilla-parker-bowles-did-not-marry-reasons/

I linked to Town and Country as this source has been referenced in this thread before. The queen did not attend their wedding only the reception.

Scroll to the end !

Harry is set to drop more ‘truths’ in his Apple TV series with Oprah
Starts Friday I believe

I wonder if Harry will comment on the real villain recently unmasked - Martin Bashir

What a sad tale of exploitation of a vulnerable person that was
I hope Oprah shows more concern for the vulnerable person she is squeezing

Harry needs to stop invading the privacy of his own family.
I barely speak to my abusive brother but no way would I speak about this in public.
Harry is not very bright and extremely unkind.
He trophy hunted a water buffalo in Africa in the noughties (pictures on google), overrode his polo pony to death and injured another with spurs.
He is spoilt and petulant - this has been covered up for years but now we are seeing the true Harry.

That's why I personally was disappointed with the quality of the interview - she just accepted everything that she was told

As a PP said, that interview would have been a long time in the making, and if she'd gone into it on a truly investigative basis she may have lost the prize

Being an astute businesswoman, Oprah probably decided it was better to take the money and practise the surprised expressions (though frankly I thought they needed a bit more practise)

@Mmmmdanone
"I haven't read all comments so sorry if this has been said, but if Harry despised the RF so much I wonder why he didn't leave it before finding a wife? He seems to have used Meghan as much as she has used him to be honest."

With all this self indulgent public navel gazing he's doing it's just making me think, my god, what a boring man. Imagine dinner time in their house, bet it's therapy night. Every night.
He probably held onto the dutiful prince bit so he could bag himself a wife. Cos I don't think, from what I've seen it's his sparkling wit and charming personality.

[quote Itreallyistimetochangethings]@Blossomtoes

The CofE changed their stance In 2002 - C&C married in 2005. The reason is here.

www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/amp29309328/prince-charles-camilla-parker-bowles-did-not-marry-reasons/

I linked to Town and Country as this source has been referenced in this thread before. The queen did not attend their wedding only the reception. [/quote]
The reason isn’t there at all. It explains why the Queen didn’t attend the civil ceremony, not why they chose to have one.

@Blossomtoes
It is - if you scroll down the page

I scrolled to the end. If it tells you the reason, please feel free to share.

The interesting thing about Meghan's 'we got married three days earlier' comment is why she said it at all. Although clearly speculative, I think that it wasn't said to the wider audience but to Harry. Was he wobbling? Agree with posters who have said that he needs to get out of the public eye and get himself sorted out in private.

I think the Oprah interview with Meghan and Harry was just the hors d’oevres.
The Apple series on mental health will be the main course. There is much more to come.
They will keep the story running until there is nothing left to say and no more money on the table.
Rinse and repeat after the coronation of Charles, William and on and on.

@Blossomtoes - you can see it in the pic I posted starting with " in an attempt to avoid controversy ...... feel free to read the rest on the link -

Goodness, I hope not rubyviolet

If it was merely a taster, there might never be any coming back from it.

Whoever is encouraging this needs to stop it. Now.

If his mental health isn’t already causing him great anguish, then it soon would be with even more explosive allegations.

The reason isn’t there at all. It explains why the Queen didn’t attend the civil ceremony, not why they chose to have one.

You seem to have conveniently skipped the paragraph leading up to your statement.

In which case they'll become as relevant as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.

One insider told Page Six : 'One of the episodes is very personal … deeply,' and that Harry is expected to drop more 'Truth Bombs' in the show.

Just a little further teaser for us all.

In the same vein as Diana/Martin Bashir, this sounds very much like exploitation to me!

That’s big business for you, there’s a lot of $$$ riding on this

What is there to say about Beatrice. She looks very happy and it’s lovely she’s having a baby.