Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry's latest ventures

999 replies

Viviennemary · 15/05/2021 18:23

Now being reported in the Daily Express that Harry is working on a new tell all documtary about royal life. This is according to his biographer Angela Levin. And even more disclosures about the royal family are forthcoming. Is this going to go on for years. We shall have to wait and sed. I think its very very wrong of him.

OP posts:
TruelyStruttingHotpants · 21/05/2021 11:17

Well the latest stuff shows that the man talking about Harry having to much therapy was right. Noticeably he is not claiming any responsibility for his own actions ever too. Watching the two ladies talk about their own trauma you really see the difference. They don't make Harry's latest truths seem relevant at all. Interesting that whoever produced it put them together with Harry. I think someone is trying to say look at this guy and his truths 🙄

SueSaid · 21/05/2021 11:25

'They are two completely different situations Andrew us a stupid arrogant possibly sexually dysfunctional adult who was taken to the cleaners by Emily Maitlis. Harry is a vulnerable man with mental health issues who is being possibly exploited by a massive media machine'

This. It seems H's vulnerability is only obvious to some people. To compare him to PA or Beatrice is ridiculous.

On the day that Diana's exploitation and manipulation is all over the media too. Yes that infamous interview was agreed through deception but I note Oprah was vying for an interview with Diana then too Confused.

Yoshinori · 21/05/2021 11:27

@Summercocktailsinthesnow

When I think that he had/has an alternative.

Harry could be living his life riding horses, raising money and awareness and doing proper humanitarian work in Africa, healing quietly away from this circus of cameras and the mass global parasites feeding from his sadness. He could be in Africa a country he adores, he would truly have found some measure of freedom, contentment and some purpose to his life.

He could be anywhere, but he has ended up in the worst possible scenario with so many abusing this man. I am angry when I try to imagine how these people live with themselves.

When I look at where Harry is now, and what is happening to him I do feel desperately desperately sorry for him. This really does not feel like it is going to end well. I hope I am wrong.

Africa is not a country.
Eaumyword · 21/05/2021 11:28

@StatisticallyChallenged

He comes across as incredibly vengeful, which in itself suggests he's not in a mentally healthy place. As PP said, he's speaking from an open wound as he's processing things. And whilst processing things and working through trauma is important it is a process and the way you feel at different points are not always entirely rational. Going on TV repeatedly at the stage he seems to be at is a potentially very destructive thing to do.

The comments about Meghan's reasons for not committing suicide were really concerning to me - both in terms of what it says about their relationship but also what it says to/about suicidal people.

I wouldn't want to grow up in the RF and I have no doubt they have many failings but this dynamic of him constantly taking aim whilst simultaneously complaining that he hated the intrusion, stories, press narrative and so on is just so counterproductive and hypocritical. He hated people (including MMs family) selling stories about him but he is doing exactly the same to his own family.

We need to talk about mental health issues and dealing with trauma, but I don't think this will help him in the long run.

This.
SueSaid · 21/05/2021 11:34

'Africa is not a country.'

Yes get it right pp. He could be happy in a country in Africa which is the world's second-largest and second-most populous continent silly!

IcedPurple · 21/05/2021 11:51

This is Harry's new life now.

He's being used for clickbait and controversy by those who don't have his best interests at heart. This isn't about 'mental health'. It's about Harry making a spectacle of himself for other people's benefit.

bluebell34567 · 21/05/2021 11:56

@Cinclus

And then Charl3s did his interview in a tat for your tit move.

Charles did his interview before Diana did hers.

But I love "tat for your tit" and will be using it daily Grin

GrinGrinGrin
the80sweregreat · 21/05/2021 11:57

All the talking and therapy available in the world will not bring his Mum back or repair the relationship with his dad and his brother.
He has spoken at length with therapists and now through the media , but what will it honestly achieve? Sometimes in life you have to move on. You have to admit that you can't change the past and try to build a future. He has a child and another on the way, they are all fit and healthy and they have money and a beautiful home. You have to see the positives. He is just focusing on the negatives. Who is fueling all this?
It's not helpful that people are playing on his insecurities and it comes across as milking the situation for his own ends which is more money I guess. Burning all your bridges with his family isn't a good move, but he has done it now.
He is being manipulated and managed.
It's all very sad really.

Angiedx · 21/05/2021 11:59

Blossomtoes

Angiedx
@Blossomtoes

not my job to educate

It’s out there and available
You don’t really understand debate, do you? You’ve just told me I’ve made an incorrect statement, it’s not unreasonable to ask you why it’s incorrect. Since you won’t do that, I’ll continue with my assertion that they left maintaining they wanted privacy.

I hear you.. that was a tad pa .. my bad 😬

Started writing a reply but didn’t want to do a synopsis and mis-quote it go down the rabbit hole if funding and linking the statements so didn’t

Sometimes just better to just let it go

Angiedx · 21/05/2021 12:00

Or go down the rabbit hole of finding even

User27aw · 21/05/2021 12:11

Unbelievable to think they have only been married for 3 years. So much has happened in those 3 years.

RubyViolet · 21/05/2021 12:15

@User27aw

Unbelievable to think they have only been married for 3 years. So much has happened in those 3 years.
Whilst their PR companies are on their payroll and releasing almost daily press releases, we can expect more of the same. Someone start a follow up thread Harry Ventures 2. I think this is only the beginning.
bluebell34567 · 21/05/2021 12:18

it seems someone is hell bent on causing as much divide between the families as possible......

so true.

Rainbunny · 21/05/2021 12:36

I think Harry's recent behaviour is very unhealthy actually.

He comes across as almost ecstatic in talking about how awful his family is. I do believe he's quite literally high on his own drama right now, in that he is experiencing a chemical high in his brain through his "unburdening" which he is doing with seemingly no real thought as to others' feelings or the consequences. He's using therapy language but this is not healing, it's dwelling and score-settling dressed up as therapy.

As others have commented, what a mess. I hope he doesn't come back for Diana's statue ceremony, there needs to be a (long) period of distance and silence for all involved.

ShamedBySiri · 21/05/2021 12:51

Oh God. The Statue ceremony. What a mess. It's going to be awful for all concerned. What should have been a special tribute by the boys for their mother. They obviously were too young to have any input in the choice of the memorial fountain which I, for one, found deeply underwhelming when I visited it and presumably wanted to make a lasting tribute of their own.

It's a mere six weeks away, Harry will have to isolate for two weeks before, he will need to be forming travel arrangements very soon and that baby had better arrive asap. Unless it's not due until well into July.
I can't see him wanting to leave Meghan with a new baby for two weeks plus. Or to miss the birth.

Such a shame when they planned it with love and pride and as close brothers. Now it's going to be a ghastly duty to get through as best they can.

OverByYer · 21/05/2021 12:55

Yes the statue service, which should have been a time for the brothers to come together and honour their Mother’s memory will now be a complete circus with the world watching their every move and gesture

IcedPurple · 21/05/2021 12:56

*So they start negotiating with Netflix/Spotify - who frankly will know they need the money.

Whilst much has been made of the value of the deals £100/25m respectively what's not clear is the terms.*

These figures are being thrown around but I doubt the deals are anywhere near that lucrative.

The only NF project they've announced is an Invictus documentary which won't air for another year. Very 'worthy' but not likely to draw in Bridgerton levels of viewing figures. They only did one Spotify podcast, which was a very boring assembly of pre-recorded platitudes from assorted celebrities about life in lockdown. Normally podcasters release podcasts at least once or twice a month.

NF and Spotify aren't fools. They're not signing big cheques for nothing.

SueSaid · 21/05/2021 12:56

'He's being used for clickbait and controversy by those who don't have his best interests at heart. This isn't about 'mental health'. It's about Harry making a spectacle of himself for other people's benefit'

Yes.

'He comes across as almost ecstatic in talking about how awful his family is. I do believe he's quite literally high on his own drama right now, in that he is experiencing a chemical high in his brain through his "unburdening" which he is doing with seemingly no real thought as to others' feelings or the consequences'

It does seem that this projection and blaming is empowering him. It's like an episode of the crown, reality and make believe all blurring into one. I hope this is it.. much as I think he is behaving appallingly I really don't want him to unravel publicly anymore.

Angiedx · 21/05/2021 13:00

I really hope both William and Harry are both there if the statue ceremony goes ahead as I don’t think it would feel right if either were missing

Everyone else whatever not required

But it needs to be her two sons

BlueLobelia · 21/05/2021 13:04

@Angiedx

I really hope both William and Harry are both there if the statue ceremony goes ahead as I don’t think it would feel right if either were missing

Everyone else whatever not required

But it needs to be her two sons

agree.
CokeDrinker · 21/05/2021 13:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

CokeDrinker · 21/05/2021 13:52

[quote Itreallyistimetochangethings]@CokeDrinker - I understand where you are coming from and I suspect many antis do but they will never admit it. In lots of African cultures there are two ceremonies. The traditional and the western with the priest/ vicar. The traditional is with family and the elders officiate the ceremony. ManyAfrican parents would not consider their children married if they had not had the traditional ceremony. The church / registry event can be as grande as anything - if the traditional has not taken place the marriage is not recognised by the family. So yes there are other ways and views of understanding what a marriage ceremony is to different people and cultures. Many of The younger generation with western influence now see the traditional as the engagement but the elders/ parents do not accept this for them it is the marriage.
Justin Welby only came out to clarify because of the fuss being made. Most people with common sense knew what she meant by the word spectacle - it was a show for the world to see which is true whether you like it or not.

And whoever said Charles had a registry office wedding - his first marriage was a huge spectacle - rightly so they both probably wanted a low key affair for their 2nd marriage [/quote]
Thank you. :)

CokeDrinker · 21/05/2021 13:55

@Blossomtoes Exactly that. The irony that the heir to the throne couldn’t have a church wedding because his bride was divorced but the third in line could.

Hardly irony! Simply that what wasn't acceptable back then is acceptable now. Are you going to say it is 'irony' that women now work, simply because it wasn't acceptable in the early 1900s? The absurdity and desperation at that attempt at an argument is pitiful and beneath you.

SheldonesqueTheBstard · 21/05/2021 13:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page