What if they are suing this time to out the sources?
Belarus that had occurred to me too because I am still struggling to see what the potential advantages are to K or W&K of taking legal action. Could knowing sources be what they want?
The snipy stuff rehashed in that article goes back years though so I wondered if maybe they feel there’s someone been briefing against them very long term and want to know who it is. Can legal cases reveal that though, I thought journalists sources were always private?
But even then, it still feels like legal action stands more chance of hindering than helping W&K because of the circus it creates of assertions, counter-claims and creating a topical platform for anyone to have a go at W&K who wants to.