Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and Meghan 19 (The One With The Capitalisation)

999 replies

TheMustressMhor · 22/02/2020 11:11

Off we go.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
ilovejeffgoldblum · 24/02/2020 12:14

Ps it's a shame we're not allowed to post pics of our pets anymore Sad

SussexRoyalties · 24/02/2020 12:19

Will this do instead jeff?

I hope to see similar tree decorations featuring the Harkle dogs.

Harry and Meghan 19 (The One With The Capitalisation)
NumbersStation · 24/02/2020 12:23

I for one would be interested to know what he spoke about at the dinner.

I doubt very much he’d get an invite to discuss the price of eggs or the benefits of wearing gloves in a Canadian winter. Or a pay packet if it comes to it.

When a respectful silence has been held for so long, it would be a bit distasteful to get paid to speak to strangers about your famous but dead mum.

peridito · 24/02/2020 12:23

Sometimes I wonder how many posters on here have looked at H&M's website ,whether they've read what is said about their commitment to the Queen or even if they have read the full sentence which contains the word collaborate .

Wasn't someone on here telling me to believe the whole story and not pick and choose elements to believe .

ajandjjmum · 24/02/2020 12:24

Not yet Mustress! I get too confused when there are two threads running simultaneously. I realise that might mean you sitting up until 3 am until we hit post 990 - really appreciate that! Grin

OVienna · 24/02/2020 12:25

Perditio
As I said earlier on here, I didn't want to comment until I accessed their website.

My discomfort with them is from their own posts and words. That is what I rely on.

ajandjjmum · 24/02/2020 12:28

Isn't it strange how many things have come to pass, that those of us who were not fans of Meghan were hammered on earlier in this series of threads.

Maybe we're not all so nasty and spiteful after all.

Cohle · 24/02/2020 12:29

Sometimes I wonder how many posters on here have looked at H&M's website ,whether they've read what is said about their commitment to the Queen or even if they have read the full sentence which contains the word collaborate .

I think it's a bit patronising to assume that those who disagree with you simply haven't read their statements in full. Hmm

OVienna · 24/02/2020 12:29

Exactly.

OVienna · 24/02/2020 12:33

It was really tacky imo to have the Queen all over their website when in fact it emerged immediately they hadn't reached agreement with BP over their new roles.

Bluntness100 · 24/02/2020 12:39

I think millions upon millions of people have read their statements in full
It is indeed a shallow argument when people don’t agree with you, to simply then revert to the petty “have you even read those statements”.

The very obvious issue is we have all read then.

Only those with a poor understanding of the English language would fail to understand what those statements clearly states. Only those with a poor understanding of English would fail to understand the intent. Meghan and Harry do not have a poor understanding so one must assume they intended to publish what they did.

Pretending they didn’t, or that their language skills are so poor they failed to comprehend what they were saying, or that the public have not read what has been published in full widely, or that even we don’t understand it, is just silly,

It is what it is. No point in pretending otherwise. All we have to do is wait for the next distasteful action they under take.

If they are smart they will go silent for a period, talk about charity work a lot, ply happy families, and try to behave like responsible adults.

Not to continue to behave like a pair of adults who feel they are fully entitled to have the duchy of Cornwall pay millions for them, for the British public to pay for their security, to use the royal brand to help them gain personal opportunities, to pocket as much cash as possible, and to lash out at the queen or anyone else who stands in their way.

Which is exactly what they have been doing.

ajandjjmum · 24/02/2020 12:56

Spot on Bluntness100.

Be interesting to see how many 'spontaneous' visits Meghan makes around Vancouver, once Harry is back in the UK at the end of the week.

peridito · 24/02/2020 13:00

I don't doubt some of you have read the website ,but I still wonder how many .
Bluntness It is indeed a shallow argument when people don’t agree with you, to simply then revert to the petty “have you even read those statements
I have no idea what you are talking about . I disagree that the use of the word collaborate on the website shows the intent so many attribute . That's not an argument that's my view . As I've said before - you have yours ,I have mine .We're both allowed to express them .

we have all read then how can you possibly know this ?

Only those with a poor understanding of the English language would fail to understand what those statements clearly states I'm sorry if I'm misunderstanding you but are you saying that if people don't "understand" ( understand in the way you "understand" them ? ) they must have a poor grasp of the English language ? Wow.

MorningCalm · 24/02/2020 13:00

What is the difference between starting a foundation, creating a non-profit entity and establishing a new non-profit organisation?

DandyRaven · 24/02/2020 13:04

Morning Ambiguity.

OVienna · 24/02/2020 13:06

Would anyone like to review the Companies House docs for Sussex Royal The Foundation if the Duke and Duchess if Sussex? The principle vehicle for the charitable work of TRH The Duke and Duchess if Sussex in the UK?

CO no is 12077679, accessible via Beta.

I haven't a clue what they were talking about on their website, to be fair, regarding the fact they don't intend to start a foundation, despite setting this up.

PelicanPie · 24/02/2020 13:09

Look, Perdito
You clearly think there is nothing wrong with Meghan deciding she is on an equal footing with the Queen - therefore deciding whether she deigns to 'collaborate'. That's your take, fine. Why do you insist on continuing to bang a drum reiterating again and again that you don't agree with all the posts on this thread? What is the point, from your perspective? You differ in opinion, for the love of God let it rest now. If you don't agree with us, post on the other thread .

Parker231 · 24/02/2020 13:14

We don’t know that Meghan considers herself an equal to the Queen so the comment is irrelevant. What I’m seeing is that the Queen isn’t coming across as a particularly supportive grandmother to her grandson and his family.

PelicanPie · 24/02/2020 13:16

I would say she is doing her absolute best to be supportive actually. You don't 'collaborate' with someone unless you consider yourself to be on an equal footing. It's like a minor bank clerk deciding they might agree to collaborate with the Head of the Bank of England.

ilovejeffgoldblum · 24/02/2020 13:17

Pertito remember,,scroll on by...we don't want this thread deleted so close to the end Smile

peridito · 24/02/2020 13:17

Pelican no I don't agree that" there is nothing wrong with Meghan deciding she is on an equal footing with the Queen" .I don't agree that using the word collaborate implies that .

Why do you insist on continuing to bang a drum reiterating again and again that you don't agree with all the posts on this thread? I don't agree with some posts ,some are based on rumour and fantasy and I want to challenge them .

While I don't agree with posters having to justify why they are on a thread since you've asked me can I put the same question to you ? If you find H&M's actions so distasteful why keep posting about them ?

ilovejeffgoldblum · 24/02/2020 13:18

Sorry that was to pelican ! Blush

lilmishap · 24/02/2020 13:18

The first time HMQs said No and it's as if shes never said Yes.

PelicanPie · 24/02/2020 13:19

Because I'm gobsmacked by their behaviour. I can't actually understand how it all happened and am trying to make sense of it.

lilmishap · 24/02/2020 13:22

If you find H&M's actions so distasteful why keep posting about them?

Are you serious? The discussion is based on 2 people behaving in a way that a lot of people view as distasteful, the conversation is about the behaviour and opinions on the behaviour.

Do you often join in conversation just to tell those involved they should stop and change the subject to agreeing with you?