@1starwars2
I think piling on a relatively responsible (not a puppy farmer) owner, who asked for advice is unhelpful.
Wouldn't it be better to give clear and helpful advice to ensure the puppies go to good homes?
But she hasn't done anything responsible here, so why should people support her?
Lots of people on here work in rescues or with animals and see the side effects of poor breeding everyday. It's not a case of just finding the puppies good homes - dogs who are poorly bred often have lifelong behavioural and socialisation issues.
I'm a walker and see it everyday. Dogs that are reactive because they came from poorly bred, unsocialised parents. Dogs with health issues because nobody bothered to do any health tests. Dogs with dysplasia or arthritis at age two because nobody bothered checked the hip or elbow scores of the dams and sires.
Owners who breed their dogs "because I felt like it" are part of that problem. OP admits that her dog isn't KC registered due to the age of her dog's dam. Not a good start. On top of that, neither the dam or sire have been health tested (hip, elbows and eyes at the very minimum).
However, I'm sure the puppies will be healthy and OP will therefore be able to defend her behaviour because "well, the pups were fine", totally ignoring all the risks and problems that come with backyard breeding.