Back to Morrissey's point though, the difference is that what David Norris and Gary dobson did was illegal. Bottling people and stamping on their heads is illegal. Getting drunk and disorderly in public and being anti-social and causing criminal damage is illegal. It is not behaviour that is tolerated, condoned, encouraged or dismissed by the masses as part of their culture.
Talking specifically about Morrisey's issues with the Chinese, we no longer have legal bear baiting or dog-fighting, or fox hunting and we no longer trap animals in traps that break their limbs and cause them to lie for hours/days in pain. We aim for high, humane standards in farming and animal slaughter compared to other parts of the world, and particularly China, and as far as I am aware we have never tortured and skinned cats and dogs alive in the belief that it makes their flesh more tender. It's what he perceives as a collective indifference and acceptance of something utterly abhorrent, and a lack of empathy and compassion.
Empathy and compassion for the defenceless is what puts humans above, and apart from the rest of the animal kingdom, is it not? So if he sees that empathy and compassion lacking in a particular nationality then he will draw his own conclusions about where they fit in that nation fits in human race.
Of course the Chinese are not the only race/nationality who do hideous things that we softy Westerners baulk at - but Morrissey is more concerned with the cats and dogs of China than with the plight of children being religiously sacrificed in West Africa (or even in West London) for example.
I think Morrissey is a bit of an arsehole who delights in being provocative, and I cannot argue with distaste and bewilderment at the Chinese psyche on this matter, even if I cringe at his offensive and unfortunate choice of words. On the other hand if you would like to describe Gary Dobson and David Norris as a subspecies be my guest - I will not be arguing on behalf of all British people. 