Given AppleUnderSwan‘s last post I am not sure if she is taking in anything.
I get the impression the meet up with her dd revolved around what dd was going to do in terms of education and doing A levels
Whilst dd agreed to go back to school in September to start A levels AppleUnderSwan knows the agreement was probably made under duress from her and her dd only agreed to shut the conversation down.
Then there was the offer to have the baby once per week on a Friday only
I think this was quite a strange way of saying they could help out when they could.
It just comes across as controlling and authoritarian
I also think the DD will be shuddering at the idea of her mother, the woman, who days earlier had tried to torture her into getting rid of her baby, now dictating that she will look after her baby on a Friday.
I think the dd was trying to say that there was no way she would let this woman near her baby let alone drop the child off for the day with her when she told her mother that her bf’s parents had already said they were helping her
I think the offer comes across quite rigid. In other words if you want anything else on any other day of the week don’t bother calling .
The bf’s parents might only be available for baby sitting duty 1 day per week too, but at this stage they are coming across as supportive and offering help when and where it is needed.
To this AppleUnderSwan‘s reaction is to accuse them of
encouraging this messed up situation
Which does sound like she wanted them to push her child to get an abortion and not be happy about the news and be joining in with plans for this baby.
I feel it was one thing for the news of the pregnancy to be a shock but quite another the way AppleUnderSwan went about trying to coerce her into an abortion