As much as the American interpretation seems heavily diluted by the vast ocean between them, they do seem to understand better than other countries that it's not chiefly a religious conflict, merely the tinder that sets it alight, and that national identity is key.
Potentially because Americans have always been traditionally encouraged to take pride in their ethnic roots and maintain communities around that and, in turn, know what it's like to be treated as second rate citizens for that identity as a result.
On the other hand, I have always felt presenting the conflict as religious was a purposeful move of propaganda that's widely accepted in Europe as it easily glances over the UK's long and troublesome colonial conduct, a template of many former European colonolial powers, and removes scrutiny to see the conflict in that tradition. As an ex colony, it's easy to see why the US views it from the perspective of the formerly oppressed.
As admirable the achievement of the Blair and Clinton administrations alongside the vested local parties was in realising the GFA, the real achievement has been in maintaining that against all odds. I remember strongly that it was celebrated with a great amount of caution for good reason. It pains me to see how the UK govts under TM and BJ have been taunting something so fragile in favour of its own national identity politics in recent years and the violence that has already resurged from it. I hope for a better outlook following your next GE, but I'm not optimistic.
The recent documentary series on the BBC, The Troubles: A Secret History, was excellent on this subject, would definitely recommend watching it.
And on a lighter note, I just need baggy dungarees worn with one side down and a cropped t-shirt underneath to be in fashion in Derry Girls for my tween 90s revival to feel complete.