Very thought provoking, MrsMac and Pest, and MrsMac that was a sterling contribution from you on changing fashions in perfume on the controversial thread.
It's a good question whether we scent lovers should or shouldn't use the term "old lady" to describe old style fragrances, given that so many other people use it dismissively.
Among ourselves I tend to think it's not a problem because we subvert its common usage to describe scents far more complex and adventurous than much that is on the market today. With us, "old lady" and variations on it become high praise.
But I wouldn't use the same phrase to describe a scent to a non-perfumista in case I gave the impression I was using it to denigrate. 'Old style', 'classic', 'retro', 'old-fashioned' would all, I think, be a safer choice although, damn it, there is nothing wrong with being an old lady and the phrase shouldn't carry negative associations.
So should we be using "old lady" or not? Are we reclaiming it or inadvertently encouraging its use as an insult? I think we're reclaiming it but...
Personally I wouldn't use 'vintage', although it seems an obvious choice, simply because it is so widely used to describe perfume several years or more old. So I'd think of a bottle of Anais Anais from the 1980s as 'vintage' but a bottle of Vol de Nuit turned out this year as 'old style' etc .
I also think sticking to a signature scent is more likely to encourage over-spraying because we do stop noticing everyday smells - think of how you can only smell your own home when you come back from a holiday. So experimentation is good, as well as a lot of fun, because I don't want to over-spray. I wear perfume for my own enjoyment and have no intention of impinging on others.
And now for some light relief. Mary the finding scents for Harry Potter characters starts halfway down this page on the third thread. I don't think we ever came up with one for Harry himself. Any ideas or suggested alternatives? I now want to Portkey Tom Ford's Fucking Fabulous through a wormhole to James Potter. Such matching levels of arrogance deserve each other!