Cizzbot, great find, that's hilarious! CH dedicated an entire blog post to that Estée Lauder eye cream and raved about it in her bathroom video with Sali but now she can't remember ever trying it. 
Regarding iamnina, sorry if I'm being daft, but why are people saying that she has de-registered? She hasn't come back to the thread (and there could be many reasons for that), but I can't see anything that would indicate she has deleted her account?
If she has made false allegations, it would be helpful to hear what they were. A lot of what she said seems quite plausible and dismissing it all as "inaccurate" without going into further detail can easily look like trying to silence an uncomfortable poster. I'm not suggesting that this is what Jane or MrsTubbs are trying to do at all, I just wanted to emphasize what it can look like.
The fact that iamnina may have shared confidential work information on here to me doesn't necessarily mean her allegations are untrue, even if she did it to settle a personal score (which may not even be the case). In a former job, I almost ended up whistleblowing and that certainly wasn't about revenge but all about protecting unsuspecting clients.
Jane, I think it's great that you and Haley have repeatedly spoken up about transparency and started a campaign, even though for my taste the proposals don't go far enough. May I ask if any well-known bloggers have signed your manifesto / linked to that post / shown support in any other way?
I have just had a look at your disclosure page and while it is miles ahead of many others, I think it would be great if you could elaborate on the consultancies bit (names of companies you have worked with past and present). Also it would be nice to know which companies have misbehaved behind the scenes so we can avoid.
You have stated that "the arrows have missed their target". Who or what should our target be? Are you like Sali referring to "much worse offenders" and if so, who are they? What should subscribers be doing in your opinion? And why aren't more bloggers just doing it themselves? Surely the blogging community can't expect readers to campaign the ASA for stricter rules? I think that would be very low on everyone's priority list when there are much more important issues people can't be arsed to campaign against.
You said that "most of us (bloggers) want no part of the wrongs". If that is the case, many of the big names have been remarkably silent on the issue. I'm not doubting your good intentions at all, just wondering, how many are really on board with them.