Hello perfume-people.
I visited Harrods the other day and I have news! The new Serge Lutens is out!! I was on a mission to buy a particular kind of thing and couldn't spray it on me, just paper, and couldn't devote much time but ... I can report that it is very cold and strange on an initial blast-on-paper. However, as we know, first impressions are most definitely nothing to stake your life on with SL. (Which is pretty amazing and daring and completely at odds with current selling practices/modern culture when you think about it.) I think I will be returning to try again.
I also came across the new Clinique fragrance: "Beyond Rose". Now, here's a thing, is it the new Clinique fragrance? Harrods is full of perfumes that are developed by familiar fragrance companies, for the Middle Eastern market, and are otherwise not very available in the UK. I always think it's kind of like those pop groups in the 80s who did commercials for the Japanese market, but not in the UK - and then videos of the adverts would sell for large sums in the small ads section of the NME!
This fragrance is definitely quite Middle Eastern - there is a big nod to the whole "oudh" thing.
But I think it is for over here.
And now I'm wondering what it might "mean".
If you're in London, or another big city, or quite into perfume, oud is almost certainly very familiar to you. but I'm guessing that is not the case for people outside that circle.
What do you all think about that? Is that true?
Anyway, that would make the Clinique fragrance a bit of an attempt at a "breakthrough", bringing something that's been bubbling away right into the mainstream. Maybe??
I don't know - I'd love your thoughts.
One review I read pointed out that since all the regulation changes about what you can and can't have in perfume these days, there has been an almighty hole in the European and American market for the big, heavy scents (not the Angel-gourmand-alikes) that can't really be made anymore. And the oudh thing has been addressing that cultural gap.
Do you think that's true?
Anyway, it's quite nice, I think. It reminds me - a lot - of the Body Shop "Amber Oud" (I think that's what it's called, I'm too lazy to run upstairs and check) that I bought for £6 a while back. I tend to wear it layered with a rose scent and a vanilla bourbon. It's surprisingly similar in its "directness"! It's very mentholly in its initial opening - which, again, strikes me as being quite brave in a mainstream perfume. But perhaps I'm wrong? And it then settles into the sort of rose/oud inspired scent that is ... not unfamiliar to those of us who are familiar with such things. 
Anyhow, I'd love to hear all your opinions!!