Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Sex board in Active and Ann Summers

181 replies

AutumnLeavesFallingIntoPlace · 22/02/2023 17:37

Hi @MNHQ

As the previous thread about the sex board being in Active is almost full after a lot of discussion, I think a few of us were hoping you could address the main concerns arising:

  • firstly and most importantly, it seems that no one wants it in Active. Posters on the sex board and off are widely agreeing across all threads that it was better not showing in Active for many reasons. It's making everyone's experience worse.
  • secondly, we'd like to know to what extent Ann Summers and other advertisers have dictated the change in the sex board's visibility and the change in users being required to register three months prior to being able to post on the sex board to seven days. The 'reigniting intimacy' promotional piece seems to suggest this is a deliberate choice to bring the forum 'inline with [Ann Summers'] Pleasure Positivity Project'. Given the response to previous threads on Ann Summers in 2021 and 2022, they are not popular with many site users and their maternity/postpartum promotion might be considered to be unhelpful and unsupportive of new mothers and very much not in the spirit of MN.
  • the sex board hosts a sexchat thread which invites users to contact each other via DM for explicit conversation and then move to other platforms to continue. There are no safety warnings or age verification on the sex board and this puts users at risk of predators exploiting MN's trustworthy reputation, particularly given the change in registration requirements
  • finally, a lot of us wonder why MN have done such a u turn on the sex board, having argued initially that it would attract trolls. How and why did this change?
OP posts:
Mermaidparades · 23/02/2023 16:16

@DaisyDucks Did you mean to be so rude?? As Emily Nagoski says ‘don’t yuck my yum’ 🤣

DaisyDucks · 23/02/2023 16:19

Mermaidparades · 23/02/2023 16:16

@DaisyDucks Did you mean to be so rude?? As Emily Nagoski says ‘don’t yuck my yum’ 🤣

I was making a dry joke at some of the hysteria toward the topic on MN.

Mermaidparades · 23/02/2023 16:22

Oh @DaisyDucks thank goodness 🤣🤣

beastlyslumber · 23/02/2023 16:23

DaisyDucks · 23/02/2023 13:41

It's like saying twitter is for sexually active people, or Bake Off is for sexually active people. Makes no sense.

I believe the min age to use Twitter is below the legal age of consent so I won’t be sexualising those users on a parenting forum.

I don’t understand what you’re saying about bake-off? There is a junior version of the show. Seems a bit creepy to sexualise the show.

No I said it would be a nonsensical thing to say that those things are for sexually active people, just as it's nonsensical to say that MN is for sexually active people.

I'm not trying to sexualise anyone or anything - the opposite, in fact.

But good to know who you are.

MeganTheeScallion · 01/03/2023 10:16

Ah cheers @AdamRyan !

New posts on this thread. Refresh page