Lobbyists and preassure groups are an integral part of our democracy Jassy. All seek to influence social policies and laws that apply to everyone. Sometimes they are successful, sometimes not. Ultimately it comes down to the elected government.
Yes, thank you. I understand how lawmaking works. I was pointing out that examples of religious institutions working in the interests of diversity, rather than in the interests of 'their own', can often be pretty hard to find. That's their right, but it's not great for inclusion or diversity.
Do you propose to ban all these groups or just discriminate against the religious ones^
I don't propose to ban anyone, but it's an interesting straw man you've created there. Do you often feel the need to make up things people haven't said rather than discussing what they have?
I was simply pointing out that the statement that religion inherently enhances diversity was a pretty questionable one, at best.
I agree that people making their own choices is paramount. But I don't pretend that a choices people make are equal in terms of their impact on society. Some choices people make have a negative impact on either themselves or others. I defend their right to make those choices, within reason, but in doing so I can think the choice they are making isn't a great one, and that it has a net negative impact.