"Going back to the caning in the schools you were talking about yesteraday, isn't it a little 'safer' that it happens with the office door open and in view of 1 or 2 people?"
Well, that's one way of looking at it, Theodoresmummy. But I don't think that was the idea, do you?
It might be different if they'd been official (male) witnesses. Because in Zim corporal punishment is an exclusively male thing (blatant gender discrimination, in fact). So to have two females in the area listening to the beatings and watching boys going in and out is degrading in the extreme, IMO, especially when the boys know those females were always exempt themselves. You can imagine their resentment. FA talks about their humiliation in front of their classmates, but I'd say that's minor. Between themselves they'd have a jokey "me today, you tomorrow" attitude. But having to walk past two young women gazing at them in the outer office is humiliation on another level.
Also those boys are caned on the bum, which is sexually very suggestive. To slap someone on the buttocks is classed as sexual harassment in the adult world, because the buttocks are seen as a sexual area. When I arrived in the UK in the 1980s there was debate raging about caning in schools, and people were calling it "a pervert's charter". After all, when grown men pay prostitutes to dress up as schoolmistresses they're not paying for detention or "lines", are they?
So try it the other way round. Imagine a world where only girls get caned, and there are two young blokes drinking coffee in the outer office listening to the canings and then eyeing them as they walk past... Get the picture? The fact that this deputy headmaster didn't even have the decency to close the door to his office gives me a very bad feeling.