Not only do I strongly prefer other bisexual people, when I was dating, being bisexual became a requirement after experiencing enough straight men oversexualising bi women for their own gratification and enough of the accusations and tension from lesbian partners that I'll never get involved with either again.
However, I also wouldn't get into a relationship with anyone who said said anything like 'everyone is a bit bisexual' or viewed one sex as for sexual relationships only. Both give me the fuck no ick.
Why is thinking someone is gay (rather than bisexual) a negative thing? Your thoughts and feelings appear to be routed in homophobia.
It's a recognised oddity that bisexuals of either sex are often presumed to 'actually' only want men and that our acting on our attraction to women is to either attract men or to manipulate & hurt women.
It's not homophobic to notice this issue that's been talked about for decades or find it off-putting and negative how often it is presumed that someone is lying about being bisexual and really only wants dick.
Dating and relationships are by definition exclusionary. I don't care about other adult's preferences behind closed doors. I do get why others might find seeing the same old negative tropes about bisexuals being trotted out a bit tiresome.
Men who have sex with men are at a greater risk than their heterosexual male counterparts.
True. However, a bisexual man who has never had sex with another man - or anyone - is still bisexual with the same risks as their heterosexual - or other virgin - counterparts. Just knowing a person's sexuality doesn't tell us what their STI risks are. Only STI testing does.
I personally can't be truly attracted/interested unless I feel a man is all for me, that he's really in to me and I'd be able to truly fulfill him. If you think you have the right to dictate what others find attractive, it's yourself who's in need of some introspection.
I don't think I have a right to dictate what others find attractive.
I do think there is a common misunderstanding that bisexuals have some sort of side that we can never have fulfilled by another individual, perpetuated by the cultural concept that sexualities are all about being attracted to a sex rather than to an individual. I think that cultural model has flaws that cause many issues.
Bisexuals are in relationships with a person, not a side, just like everyone else. I've been married for a couple decades, I'm utterly, truly fulfilled by my husband. My sexuality has been channelled into my relationship with him, regardless of my previous relationships and attractions.
The idea I won't be because I've previously had sex with women and have been attracted to women holds about as much water to me as the manosphere types who claim I can no longer properly pair bond because of how many previous sexual partners I've had. These ideas gain a lot of popularity within our current cultural frameworks around sexuality, and I think work needs to be done for better models, even if it doesn't change at all whether people find bisexuals to be attractive partners. It might at least humanise us a bit more.