The key difference between marriage (or any romantic relationship) and friendship is the sexual aspect. The fact that the couple are exclusively intimate with each other.
So it’s strange that people are happy to say marriage is a commitment to share fun and interests, to support each other’s pursuits, but somehow not to be there for each other’s intimate needs. Somehow the fundamental aspect becomes a maybe.
But for argument’s sake, let’s look at the commitment you do agree with. Are you saying a man or woman can force their spouse to take up a hobby they enjoy? That they can insist their spouse joins them in every activity they find fun?
Because to me, that sounds like coercion.
Yet you’ve said marriage is a commitment. So are you now advocating coercion?
So how about we leave out the loaded and toxic terms and ideas. Instead of focusing on what each spouse is entitled to take from the other, let’s talk about what each has committed to give.
And I think we can all agree that committing to your spouse doesn’t mean they now have the right to force you.
So maybe let’s just be honest and acknowledge that marriage is, in part, a commitment to meet each other’s intimate needs. Just like it’s a commitment to meet emotional or financial needs. This doesn’t mean the other spouse can demand it, but if we’re talking purely about obligations, then yes, when you get married, you obligate yourself to your spouse.