"how women talk about it on threads like this. Aghast that the subject has even been raised. Using the worst language they can find to describe sex. Deliberate misunderstandings, ad-hominems and strawmen galore."
So women are aghast when an OP says she's being sexually coerced by her H? Sounds about right. Aghast means "filled with shock, horror, or amazement; struck with overwhelming surprise or FEAR".
Yes, women are horrified and afraid when they hear that a woman is being sexually coerced. And they are angry about it, because they want this shit, this sexual aggression, this relentless entitlement to another human's body, which is ALL AROUND US, to fucking STOP.
"Using the worst language they can find to describe sex."
That also sounds right. Women do this because that is what sex means to them in the context of sexual coercion: it is an ugly disgusting vile thing, a revolting physical invasion of a woman's unwilling body, a painful psychological injury to her mind, that is repeatedly forced on her. They are enraged that yet another woman is not FREE to say no, because then the self-obsessed H becomes mean and angry and punishing.
"Deliberate misunderstandings, ad-hominems and strawmen galore."
I haven't seen any deliberate misunderstandings here. I think the women here understand very very well what is being said - unlike the men, clearly - and have been very clear and straighforward in their responses.
Re the ad hominems, I think it's fair that there is pushback when a man prances on here mansplaining us with, "If the physical is lacking, we will reach a point of no return especially after communicating to no avail. I am just putting it straight to you and I know I may get hate for this." Yes, we're going to say things like:
"I can imagine your ex waved you merrily while muttering "asshole" under her breath."
"It's not hate, it's puzzlement, and a bit of pity, because you haven't worked it out yet. It's really not that hard."
"Anything less than really enthusiastic consent is not really consent, IMO, so a man who would want that is not a man I’d want anyway."
"I think it's hilarious that there are men out there thinking that they checked out and left a woman with no sex drive, and it was never to return again, ho hum, she was broken. I can assure you, wholeheartedly, that the problem isn't her "drive"."
Because first, this man still seems to be under the arrogant delusion - fed by the patriarchy - that he is Very Important, more important than his wife, and that therefore his wife will be desolate and heartbroken when he chooses grandly to divorce her in his last act of punishment. Yeah, we know a LOT of women who are actually really relieved in such situations. And second, this man's follow-up posts show such one-dimensionality and such a woeful lack of theory of mind and understanding of what makes a truly loving intimate relationship that we don't respect him.
You're also mansplaining us, btw. We understand everything you're saying, before you even said it, because we've lived it and heard it again and again and again. We are light years ahead of you in all this. If you want to understand women and have good intimate relations, you should stop talking, drop your reflexive male defensiveness and arrogance, and listen. Or rather, smoke your pipe on it, as you put it :)