Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

I earn more than boyfriend, how to split expenses if we move in?

197 replies

NCedbecauseofprivacy · 27/02/2024 11:55

Hello everyone! My boyfriend of a year and I have been talking about the possibility of moving in together sometime in the Summer. We are both good earners but I earn a little bit more than him, so I am wondering how we should split expenses. We both are 35, have no plans for marriage and for the moment we will be renting in London. No plans to merge finances either.

We both work full-time in senior jobs and earn well, but he earns approximately 40% less than me. We both have plenty of savings/ investments and can comfortably afford to pay bills and then have some disposable income left.

Would it be unfair to go 50/50? Shall I offer to pay a little more given the income disparity? He says he is happy to go 50/50 but I don't want to be unfair and I am not sure how to navigate the situation to set us up well for our future together.

Thanks for your advice :)

OP posts:
Pemba · 28/02/2024 08:48

If you love someone and you're a couple, then proportion to earnings is the only fair way. Review it every few months. You're not just flatmates!

Proportionate is morally better, and also has the benefit of giving the lower earner more of a chance to save, so that if in the future the relationship fails, they will have a cushion of savings to help them start again. Rather than if they had squeezed their income to keep up with paying 50% of the desired lifestyle costs of a wealthier partner, as we so often see on threads here. Although usually it's the woman who earns less, but the sex shouldn't make any difference.

Wolfpa · 28/02/2024 08:50

I agree with @Hbosh , if you are living to the lower budget 50:50 is fine if you want to live to your budget then it needs to be proportional to what each of you earns.

Britpop123 · 28/02/2024 08:51

Janehasamane · 28/02/2024 08:48

Absolutely said it earlier, if it’s a man he should always pay more.

I don’t discriminate between the genders, I also earn more than my husband and we pay proportionately. But I am married and we have joint finances. And I am absolutely aware this is a choice I make. It is my decision, if we were just moving in and not sharing finances, then he would not be entitled to my earnings or to be subsidised by me.

i think some folks are posting who want subsidising and are coming at it from their own position, rather than simply looking at it cold.

You said her share should be half? Then a man should always pay more? Either I’m confused or you’re being refreshingly open about a double standard…

acpk55 · 28/02/2024 08:52

Janehasamane · 28/02/2024 08:48

Absolutely said it earlier, if it’s a man he should always pay more.

I don’t discriminate between the genders, I also earn more than my husband and we pay proportionately. But I am married and we have joint finances. And I am absolutely aware this is a choice I make. It is my decision, if we were just moving in and not sharing finances, then he would not be entitled to my earnings or to be subsidised by me.

i think some folks are posting who want subsidising and are coming at it from their own position, rather than simply looking at it cold.

, if it’s a man he should always pay more.

I don’t discriminate between the genders

how can you possibly claim that you don’t discriminate between the genders, when you clearly do?

PiggieWig · 28/02/2024 08:52

We did it as a percentage at that stage in our relationship. Work out the cost of your combined bills as a percentage of your combined income, then each pay that percent of your wages into a joint ‘bills’ account.

Eg. Bills come to £1000, joint income is £4000, each pay 25% of your individual income into the bills account.

alwaysmovingforwards · 28/02/2024 08:57

SallyWD · 27/02/2024 12:32

If ever I see posts where a couple pay 50/50 and the man earns more everyone says it's financial abuse and they should contribute in proportion to their earnings.
Anyway, Mumsnet double standards aside, if he's happy to pay 50/50 then maybe start with that and see how it goes. I agree you should revisit if marriage and kids come along later.

Couldn't agree more. It's fascinating and duplicitous to see it in action.

DisforDarkChocolate · 28/02/2024 09:04

At this stage I'd go for 50/50, especially as you both earn well, have savings and will probably be saving money by living together.

I'd plan to review this every 6 months or. I'm very much for paying by proportion but only when you have shared commitments like mortgages and children.

PansyOatZebra · 28/02/2024 09:08

Worldgonecrazy · 27/02/2024 12:04

Proportionate to your income is the fairest option. So if you earned £60k and he earned £40k, you would contribute 60% to joint hills and he would contribute 40%. Any money left would be personal spending.

This. Me and my husband did this when we first rented. I earned more. I think I put in £900 and him £600… oh the days when rent food bills and council tax only cost us £1500 a month…

PansyOatZebra · 28/02/2024 09:09

SallyWD · 27/02/2024 12:32

If ever I see posts where a couple pay 50/50 and the man earns more everyone says it's financial abuse and they should contribute in proportion to their earnings.
Anyway, Mumsnet double standards aside, if he's happy to pay 50/50 then maybe start with that and see how it goes. I agree you should revisit if marriage and kids come along later.

My thoughts too!

NCedbecauseofprivacy · 28/02/2024 09:21

WoodBurningStov · 28/02/2024 08:38

I'm going to go against the grain here. You're in a relationship, even if you're not married, so to a degree you have to accept that some of the finances will be family money. It would be awful if you're in a position to go on trips, out, holidays etc but because he's paying more of a % from his wages he can't. Neither of you should be worse off by moving in together.

I'd keep finances separate but split the bills etc proportionately to your wages. Or go 50/50 and you pay for stuff such as holidays or food etc.

As I mentioned earlier, none of us will be in any way struggling no matter how we split finances. The difference in our salary seems big but it does not have as much of an impact because we both earn well.

It is as if he was bringing home 5k and I was bringing 6k per month (not real numbers but just to give context/ proportion). We lead a relatively normal lifestyle and therefore we will both be comfortable with money no matter how we arrange our finances.

It is more of a principle for me, I want to do what is right for both of us.

OP posts:
WandaWonder · 28/02/2024 09:24

So it appears 50/50 when a women earns more but if not then women pays less

Foreverhope1 · 28/02/2024 09:24

Hbosh · 27/02/2024 12:28

I'm inclined to say 50/50, BUT on the condition that the one with the lowest income gets to decide the budget. You're not married and have no children, so it wouldn't make sense for you to pay for your boyfriend. However, if he wants to live in a less expensive place, be more frugal with utilities and spend less on things like eating out, holidays, activities, gifts etc, that should be fine.
If you want a bigger or fancier place with a lifestyle that fits better with your income, you should be the one to cover the difference.

Excellent advice ☀️

caringcarer · 28/02/2024 09:27

RB68 · 27/02/2024 12:12

I wld 50/50 and if you see this going somewhere put some in a fund to cover when you are on mat leave etc, with your level of income being off work for kids will hurt you more as a family than if he was and this would be a way to blance that a bit.

FOr now b4 any marriage etc 50 50 sounds fine

Good idea.

SD1978 · 28/02/2024 09:29

Personally- percentage depending on income. So you both pay proportional to your income.

Britpop123 · 28/02/2024 09:33

NCedbecauseofprivacy · 28/02/2024 09:21

As I mentioned earlier, none of us will be in any way struggling no matter how we split finances. The difference in our salary seems big but it does not have as much of an impact because we both earn well.

It is as if he was bringing home 5k and I was bringing 6k per month (not real numbers but just to give context/ proportion). We lead a relatively normal lifestyle and therefore we will both be comfortable with money no matter how we arrange our finances.

It is more of a principle for me, I want to do what is right for both of us.

I guess it’s up to you whether your principles are equality or fairness…

pontipinemum · 28/02/2024 09:39

I suppose it depends, is he going to be comfortable after paying his side? Are you choosing to live somewhere too expensive for him?

When I first moved in with my boyfriend (now husband) I could only afford a very very small crappy "studio" he didn't want that he wanted somewhere nicer. So he paid more because I simply could not afford it and wouldn't have chosen it

Other than you wanting somewhere more expensive/ more expensive things that are a stretch for him I think 50/50 is fine. It will change if ye get married or have children

pontipinemum · 28/02/2024 09:40

Sorry I didn't read any of your updates! In your case 50/50 is absolutely fine

TheLightOfEarlyMorning · 28/02/2024 09:49

No one else seems to do what we do.

Own bank accounts for our own money/ savings/ high interest accounts.

One account for bills. We pay in proportionately. If we earned the same, we'd do 50%. The higher earner pays proportionately more. We've both had times when we've earned more/ less. When I worked part time, dh paid much more into the 'bills' account. I have also paid in more.

One shared savings account- for big future purchases. How we pay in changes according to need

We each have our own personal savings - up to us to decide.

Any large purchases (kitchen/ bathroom work etc.) we work together for.

Sillysausagedog · 28/02/2024 10:09

I think it would be fair if you paid slightly more due to earning more.

Or, 50/50 but then you agree to put X amount aside in a 'joint' saving to fund holidays, days out etc for the both of you?

JonVoightBaddyWhoGrowls · 28/02/2024 10:12

I'm struggling to see how you are both high earners, you earn 40% more than him but the difference is only £1000 per month.

Putting that aside, when this was DH and I before we were engaged/had children etc, I absolutely paid in more to the joint account. I was still paying less than I'd paid before, for a nicer and bigger place. I also still had significantly more disposable income than he did.

BlueSkyBlueLife · 28/02/2024 10:15

The same than if it was the other way around and you were earning 40% less than him.
What would you consider fair?

Btw earning 40% more isn’t earning a little bit more….

BlueSkyBlueLife · 28/02/2024 10:16

WandaWonder · 28/02/2024 09:24

So it appears 50/50 when a women earns more but if not then women pays less

Yep…. Amazing that isn’t it?

BlueSkyBlueLife · 28/02/2024 10:21

NCedbecauseofprivacy · 28/02/2024 09:21

As I mentioned earlier, none of us will be in any way struggling no matter how we split finances. The difference in our salary seems big but it does not have as much of an impact because we both earn well.

It is as if he was bringing home 5k and I was bringing 6k per month (not real numbers but just to give context/ proportion). We lead a relatively normal lifestyle and therefore we will both be comfortable with money no matter how we arrange our finances.

It is more of a principle for me, I want to do what is right for both of us.

It might not impact your day to day living but it will impact HIS ability to save money and therefore any long term financial position.

You also need to think that, if you start with the idea that what is earning is more it’s the same and he can afford the same than you anyway, he might well feel ‘forced’ to agree in spendings he would not normally do.
eg rent a more expensive house/flat or go out into more expensive restaurant.

It seems that you need a much deeper discussion on finances and your relative position than just splitting bills 50/50. Because I doubt he’ll be happy to see you building up a lot of savings compare to him because he has to adjust to your lifestyle. Which is what is likely to happen if you assume there is little difference income wise between you.

BlueHops · 28/02/2024 10:44

Might not be a popular view but he should pay 100% for living basics - house, food, bills. you can opt to contribute if you wish.

Angelsrose · 28/02/2024 10:46

50/50 for sure.