Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

I earn more than boyfriend, how to split expenses if we move in?

197 replies

NCedbecauseofprivacy · 27/02/2024 11:55

Hello everyone! My boyfriend of a year and I have been talking about the possibility of moving in together sometime in the Summer. We are both good earners but I earn a little bit more than him, so I am wondering how we should split expenses. We both are 35, have no plans for marriage and for the moment we will be renting in London. No plans to merge finances either.

We both work full-time in senior jobs and earn well, but he earns approximately 40% less than me. We both have plenty of savings/ investments and can comfortably afford to pay bills and then have some disposable income left.

Would it be unfair to go 50/50? Shall I offer to pay a little more given the income disparity? He says he is happy to go 50/50 but I don't want to be unfair and I am not sure how to navigate the situation to set us up well for our future together.

Thanks for your advice :)

OP posts:
Nocturna · 27/02/2024 16:05

I’d go by proportion. That way if he is earning more than you in the future, say if you’re on maternity leave for example, the proportion precedence is already there

BarbedButterfly · 27/02/2024 16:06

Proportional to income. Always the advice I see too when other way around

therealcookiemonster · 27/02/2024 16:11

really hate the double standards of the people saying it should be 50/50. if this was the other way round, every single person would have said it should be split in proportion of income.

although OP I wouldn't be so hasty to dismiss marriage. you should read some of the threads by mumsnetters who have split up after being in a relationship of many years and raised kids. left penniless due to not being married.

trampoline123 · 27/02/2024 16:14

Our wage gap has narrowed now and there's not much difference but we've always been 50/50. We put our money in a joint account now.

When I earned a lot more than him and we were kid free with money to spare and separate accounts, id pay for dinners out, takeaways, drinks etc.

CutthroatDruTheViolent · 27/02/2024 16:19

I think proportional to income as well. Not sure why it's considered fair to be 50/50 when we all know if it were the other way round people wouldn't be advocating for that split!

Lordofmyflies · 27/02/2024 16:20

I'd do 50:50. If you are married or with kids so money is 'family' money, I think a proportion is fairest as you are a 'unit'. At the moment though, having been dating for a year, with no shared children or legal responsibilities, I'd do 50:50.

JaninaDuszejko · 27/02/2024 16:22

He is your boyfriend so 50:50 for bills.

If you were married I'd say both keep the same amount of personal money and put different amounts to a joint account to cover bills.

If you were unmarried with kids I'd say get married. Why don't you want to get married?

Also, if he earns 40 % less than you then you earn 66 % more than him which is not 'a little bit more'.

Loopytiles · 27/02/2024 16:24

50/50 on rent and bills, and rent somewhere he can afford 50%.

Aquamarine1029 · 27/02/2024 16:25

50/50, no question. You earning more is irrelevant.

FestiveAuntFanny · 27/02/2024 16:31

Whatever you decide, you should go get a joint account, use one of those online banks as they are very easy. Both pay enough into it each month for bills, rent and some fun spends. Both spend freely from this and keep what's left to yourselves in your own accounts.

That way you'll never have any rows about whose is whose, who has paid what and you can always adjust what you put into it as you like or as things evolve.

HNY2023 · 27/02/2024 16:32

I’d say go proportional to salary ….

I think it’s fairer to set ground rules now as you seem committed to the relationship.

Ladyj84 · 27/02/2024 16:36

It shouldn't matter who earns what 50/50 it what it should be

narniabusiness · 27/02/2024 18:23

Proportional to income is fair.

baileybrosbuildingandloan · 27/02/2024 19:09

Worldgonecrazy · 27/02/2024 12:04

Proportionate to your income is the fairest option. So if you earned £60k and he earned £40k, you would contribute 60% to joint hills and he would contribute 40%. Any money left would be personal spending.

Yep, I think this too.

baileybrosbuildingandloan · 27/02/2024 19:10

NCedbecauseofprivacy · 27/02/2024 12:35

Just to add context, not sure about children yet but marriage definitely not on the cards. He knows marriage is not for me and he is okay with that.

Don't have children without being married, unless he would be the one taking the career breaks etc.

Clouddrifting · 27/02/2024 19:16

I think proportional would be fair and also set you up better for the future- if one of you gets a new higher paying job the proportions change, if one of you is out of work the proportions also change. The commitment to living together as a couple is more than flatmates.

Picklestop · 27/02/2024 19:57

You don’t earn a bit more than him, you earn a lot more than him. Certainly if this was the other way around nobody would be saying 50:50. 🙄

PingvsPong · 27/02/2024 20:06

therealcookiemonster · 27/02/2024 16:11

really hate the double standards of the people saying it should be 50/50. if this was the other way round, every single person would have said it should be split in proportion of income.

although OP I wouldn't be so hasty to dismiss marriage. you should read some of the threads by mumsnetters who have split up after being in a relationship of many years and raised kids. left penniless due to not being married.

Agreed also 40% less is not a 'little less' it's almost half.
Why do you NOT want to do proportional?

PingvsPong · 27/02/2024 20:08

Shetlands · 27/02/2024 14:15

I wouldn't call that "a little bit more". However, maybe it is to you both, in which case 50/50 would be OK provided your partner agrees, can easily afford it and isn't likely to take a future financial hit if you have children.

I think the bias towards women on MN tends to be because at the point of having children, it's usually the woman whose earnings and career are compromised so it's seen as unfair for a lower earning woman to pay 50% of bills while her higher earning partner builds up his savings.

There are plenty of threads not involving children (or children belonging to the partner) and the advice is always the same - proportional!

MrsHughesPinny · 27/02/2024 20:55

I have never merged finances with partners I’ve lived with or either ex husband. I have always had a household bill total then divided that up proportionate to income plus 10% each to cover incidentals. Then each person’s money left over is theirs to do as they please with.

FairFuming · 27/02/2024 21:12

If you can both comfortably afford it then go for 50/50 but maybe you could get a separate savings account for emergencies/holidays/investing for your future and pay roughly 10% of the household costs into it so it's still there if it's needed for any reason.

ohdamnitjanet · 28/02/2024 07:16

SallyWD · 27/02/2024 12:32

If ever I see posts where a couple pay 50/50 and the man earns more everyone says it's financial abuse and they should contribute in proportion to their earnings.
Anyway, Mumsnet double standards aside, if he's happy to pay 50/50 then maybe start with that and see how it goes. I agree you should revisit if marriage and kids come along later.

Exactly this, double standards rule supreme! OP should pay a higher proportion.

SecondUsername4me · 28/02/2024 07:26

It's a new relationship and you've not lived together before, so yes, it should be 50/50. You then both choose somewhere that it affordable for the lower earner.

Sit and re-assess each year.

CloudySheep · 28/02/2024 07:34

We did a percentage based on take home pay. After about 5 years we combined finances.

PlantDoctor · 28/02/2024 07:36

50:50 is not fair. It should be proportional to income

Swipe left for the next trending thread