@AcrossthePond55 In your lengthy post, you have a habit of taking facts (as stated by the OP) I've written and accusing me of being judgemental.
It's actually you who are being judgemental.
My post repeats what the OP has written, many times in her posts.
Much of what you've written here is your own emotional and judgemental opinion, but you've tried to dress it up as factual. It's not.
It's clear that you've accused other posters (me) of not knowing the real truth. Yet your own post falls into that category.
What I know is what the OP has said.
You are the one who's introduced 'loose' and 'reputation'. I didn't and neither did the OP. But you have, even if it's to only 'prove' (in your own mind) that she wasn't either of those.
So please don't start accusing others of making judgements. Your whole post is full of them.
I think you ought to read all the OP's posts again, without a preconceived notion of what went on.
There are many misunderstandings in your post. You ask if you have the timeline correct- well, reading your post here it looks as if you've not.
For a start, the husband didn't deny the child was his.
It was 9, yes 9, years later that the mother said he was the father.
She had no proof of this at all. That is what I mean by she isn't 'reliable'.
And more to the point, 32 years ago not many boys of 16 would be able to access DNA paternity tests. (Do be realistic!)
The mother is indeed the villain because for 32 years she's lied to her daughter about her real father. The person I feel the most sympathy for is her. The other adults need to get a grip and start behaving like adults.