Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Husband been on a stag do in Marbella and a random girl has messaged me……

500 replies

Mumma2Ro · 06/05/2023 21:42

Some fake account has messaged me on instagram.
to tell me my husband paid for a prostitute when on a recent stag do in Marbella!
what the fuck do I do!?!!!!!???

OP posts:
TheLadyofShalott1 · 07/05/2023 23:16

Starlitestarbright · 07/05/2023 12:10

TheLadyofShalott1

Just stop mutilple people have disagreed with your challenge on a common phrased used . All your doing now is distracting from ops thread arguing with everyone your pov and derailing the thread in the process when really op needs support and advice.

Hi @Starlitestarbright, I am going to disobey you as the OP has made her decision - she has chosen to belive her husband (unfortunately in my opinion, but there we go) - so I am no longer derailing her thread, as in her view she appears to not need or want any more "advice".

I wish the OP well, and sincerely hope that she is has made the right choice.

Anyway, Starlite, I had already admitted to my part in derailing her thread so I didn't actually need you to tell me that, but thanks anyway. Just because there are other people who openly agree with you that "there's no smoke without fire", it still doesn't make it true, and it still doesn't make it OK to say it. Also, I am pretty sure that at least one of the people who agreed with you (and actually you seemed confused at first as well with what I meant), originally thought that I was referring to the fact that you felt that the sender of the anonymous note was someone much closer to the OP than they themself had admitted to - but hopefully I made it very clear in my next response, that I did agree with you about that, it was just you saying that "there's no smoke without fire" that I had, and still have, an issue with.

For what it's worth - nothing probably - someone made the same point as I did about that "phrase", and someone else agreed with them. The difference was that they were much more sensible than me, and only referred to "that" phrase, without quoting your post, so that had the affect that (a) it didn't draw your attention to it, and
(b) as the rest of your post wasn't shown, there wasn't anything to get confused about...

If you still want to have the last word @Starlitestarbright please feel free to do so, and I will try not to respond to it - unless of course you say something that I find too inflammatory to just ignore 😂

LaffTaff · 07/05/2023 23:34

He said maybe one of his mates did meet these girls while they were out there, and maybe one of the guys said it as a joke ‘oh yea that big one has paid for a prostitute, the blonde one has shagged someone out here and cheated on his wife bla bla bla’

See, this type of reaction would make me even more suspicious! I remember seeing/reading something once about police questioning techniques (it made quite the impression, as you can tell 😅) and how guilty parties usually offered scenarios/suggested culprits (to distract) whilst innocent parties usually didn't (no need to distract).

Busybutbored · 07/05/2023 23:56

LaffTaff · 07/05/2023 23:34

He said maybe one of his mates did meet these girls while they were out there, and maybe one of the guys said it as a joke ‘oh yea that big one has paid for a prostitute, the blonde one has shagged someone out here and cheated on his wife bla bla bla’

See, this type of reaction would make me even more suspicious! I remember seeing/reading something once about police questioning techniques (it made quite the impression, as you can tell 😅) and how guilty parties usually offered scenarios/suggested culprits (to distract) whilst innocent parties usually didn't (no need to distract).

I agree this is an odd response. Surely a normal reaction would be more of shock and denial? Only you know your husband OP, but a PP mentioned gaslighting and well this sounds like that

Tiddlypomtiddlypom · 07/05/2023 23:56

Flyinggeesei234 · 07/05/2023 20:10

How am you possibly know this?

(It’s ‘unfazed’ by the way).

I’m French, thanks for the education.

Greycloudlooming · 08/05/2023 00:07

Oh OP :(
I have read the full thread and my
heart hurts for you. I think it’s clear he did do this. The anonymous account was most likely one of his friends or friend's wives, trying to look out for you. His story makes zero sense and has more holes in than my fishnet tights. The account won’t have been some random woman, it’ll be someone who cares for you but knows you’ll be in denial and they don’t want to ruin your friendship. I think deep down you know this and that you’re worth more.

I know you’re believing him right now and will stay, but I’d definitely be taking this as a sign to prepare myself to leave should anything like this pop up again or you get the “evidence” you need.

catlady4lyfe · 08/05/2023 00:50

Wow OP... some woman would swear on everything that it wouldn't be THEIR husband that would cheat.

I do believe there is something more going on here and am very sad you've chosen to believe him and also block this person's account.

Mortimercat · 08/05/2023 02:14

@TheLadyofShalott1

Stop your boring waffle. It isn’t up to you to police the use of particular phrase.

MrsMikeDrop · 08/05/2023 02:53

Mortimercat · 08/05/2023 02:14

@TheLadyofShalott1

Stop your boring waffle. It isn’t up to you to police the use of particular phrase.

Agree. It makes me wonder why it bothers you so much as it can be a very useful and relevant phrase!

Zapzep · 08/05/2023 04:12

IAteAllTheTomatoes · 06/05/2023 21:59

Can you verify that she is a real person and is in Marbella at the moment?

It seems strange that she would have the surnames of random ersonal she met ina bar and also their wives' details.

Is there a shit stirrer closer to home who knows they are away & has a reason to cause problems? Is your partner a good liar? Most aren't & you'll know by his reaction when you confront him.

This, someone is just stirring for trouble.

TheLadyofShalott1 · 08/05/2023 06:22

MrsMikeDrop · 08/05/2023 02:53

Agree. It makes me wonder why it bothers you so much as it can be a very useful and relevant phrase!

I do hope that both you and @Mortimercat
realise that I am as entitled as anyone else on Mumsnet to say if I have a problem with something someone else has said, just as you have the right to not read it. I hope that I always manage to stay polite, although if someone is deliberately being goady towards me, I may on occassions indulge in a little (polite as possible) sarcasm - but I am not proud of myself when that happens.

As it happens, most of my posts are either long, or ridiculously long (I am hopeless at paraphrasing ☺️) so surely, you only need to see it's length, and if you wish, read a couple of lines, then when you see how boring my posts are you can just ignore them.

But @MrsMikeDrop if you have still read this far, I would be very grateful to you if you can help me to understand the benefits of this phrase:
"There's no smoke without fire",
as you have told me that it can be both a "very useful and relevant phrase"?

Rottenapples · 08/05/2023 06:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

speakout · 08/05/2023 07:08

My OH wouldn't cheat at a stag do abroad.
Because I wouldn't date a man that would consider going on a stag do.

user1471517095 · 08/05/2023 07:47

Why, on posts like these where the OP needs a bit of advice, does it always descend into a few posters arguing between themselves? PM each other.

Florenz · 08/05/2023 07:48

Don't most men go on stag dos when their friends get married? I'm sure not every man who goes to a stag do cheats on their partner.

Greycloudlooming · 08/05/2023 07:55

Florenz · 08/05/2023 07:48

Don't most men go on stag dos when their friends get married? I'm sure not every man who goes to a stag do cheats on their partner.

I don’t really get your point, most of those men’s wives don’t get messages telling them their spouse cheated.

I have actually sent an anonymous message like this before. A woman in my friend group was having affairs on plenty of fish. After multiple (30+) affairs, I thought her husband should know he was being taken for a mug. I did actually tell her several times that if she didn’t stop or tell him that I would. So I made a fake account on Facebook and messaged him. Of course she denied it and I got abusive messages back, they didn’t know it was me, but I’d done my bit. I wasn’t prepared to carry that. He left her less than 1 year later when she got pregnant despite him having a vasectomy. Deep down he knew all along but didn’t want to see it for what it was as would have meant breaking up his family.

MrsMikeDrop · 08/05/2023 08:52

TheLadyofShalott1 · 08/05/2023 06:22

I do hope that both you and @Mortimercat
realise that I am as entitled as anyone else on Mumsnet to say if I have a problem with something someone else has said, just as you have the right to not read it. I hope that I always manage to stay polite, although if someone is deliberately being goady towards me, I may on occassions indulge in a little (polite as possible) sarcasm - but I am not proud of myself when that happens.

As it happens, most of my posts are either long, or ridiculously long (I am hopeless at paraphrasing ☺️) so surely, you only need to see it's length, and if you wish, read a couple of lines, then when you see how boring my posts are you can just ignore them.

But @MrsMikeDrop if you have still read this far, I would be very grateful to you if you can help me to understand the benefits of this phrase:
"There's no smoke without fire",
as you have told me that it can be both a "very useful and relevant phrase"?

Try Google if you don't understand the saying, while you're doing it also try "The lights are on, but nobody is home" 🤭

CornishGem1975 · 08/05/2023 09:04

speakout · 08/05/2023 07:08

My OH wouldn't cheat at a stag do abroad.
Because I wouldn't date a man that would consider going on a stag do.

What?! Mumsnet really is an alternate universe.

Katey83 · 08/05/2023 09:17

It’s likely he did it, but you don’t break
up a marriage for an anonymous tip off on Instagram, so she’ll have to wait to see if he slips up again.

Doggymummar · 08/05/2023 09:26

I love the way the comments have carried on even though the deluded poster left on Saturday I think it was. Clearly an emotive subject.

BlumminKids · 08/05/2023 10:43

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it just may be a duck!

Bumblebeestiltskin · 08/05/2023 10:48

Mumma2Ro · 06/05/2023 21:52

The person messaging me has said she met them all out in a bar. And got talking to 2 of the boys (she mentions their names)
and she said she got lots of juicy stories out of them.
one being that my husband slept with a prostitute and that another one of their friends met a girl out there and had sex with her.
She calls my husband by his name and calls him the big guy.
but then she said she never actually met my husband….. so how would she know he was a big guy then!?

As someone who used to live there, it's fairly common for stag parties to go to brothels there, sorry 😞

sevenbyseven · 08/05/2023 11:01

CornishGem1975 · 08/05/2023 09:04

What?! Mumsnet really is an alternate universe.

I agree!

Dwightlovesmichael · 08/05/2023 11:05

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 07/05/2023 21:21

So she should sleep with him, possibly catch an STD (which he may have picked up on the stag do) and then get herself tested?

Instead of insisting that her husband gets tested (preferably now and then again in about 3 months)?

They should both get tested.

Who knows, he might have done it before.

I would be getting tested and if I was going to believe him and stay with him, I would still insist he got tested and I would not be going anywhere near him until I had seen the results that he was all clear.

TheLadyofShalott1 · 08/05/2023 11:39

MrsMikeDrop · 08/05/2023 08:52

Try Google if you don't understand the saying, while you're doing it also try "The lights are on, but nobody is home" 🤭

I am so sorry that you are embarrassing yourself by showing your almost total lack of comprehension on what has been said between me and a few other PP's on this subject, on this thread @MrsMikeDrop, but I suppose the fact that we are all anonymous saves you from the even worse embarrassment of potentially almost the whole world knowing about it 🤭

I doubt that you have the foggiest idea why I am saying this, so I will try and explain more eloquently than I have sadly managed so far:

I understand the saying
"There's no smoke without fire", very well MrsMike, which is why I asked @Starlitestarbright on about page 2 to please - I hope I was polite and used the word "please" - not use that phrase.

My question to you MrsMike, although related, was not 'what does the phrase
"There's no smoke without fire" mean, but rather

'Can you explain to me please, why/how you think that the phrase

"There's no smoke without fire"

can be, in your own words, both "very useful and relevant"?

As I said much earlier in this thread, I think that that phrase has the potential to be very dangerous. Iam going to give you an extreme example now (which I sincerely hope doesn't lead to heated discussions about my choice of example. I know it is a very emotive subject, and probably not a very good choice for an example, but I am using it in the hope that more Mumsnetters - and particularly you in this instance MrsMike - will understand what I am saying, because they can understand the scenario...

ExtremeExample:

A rumour has come to light that a paedophile has been released from prison into the area, and is being housed in a bedsit within two blocks of the local Primary School.

So the local people are - IMO obviously and quite rightly - both furious and very worried about this, especially as no name, no photo, and no actual address has accompanied this frightening news. So lots of digging (figuratively speaking), and some mild (and some not so mild) cross questioning of local councillors, and harassment of the local police force, has taken place.

At last someone manages to get a name and address; now the person they have the name and address for, moved in last week, but strangely the address is in a much nicer block of flats - or apartments, as described by Estate Agencies - than they were expecting. But the irate locals brushed off that fact - if they thought about it at all - thinking "well no-one said that only poor people were paedophiles. As the incensed locals are so upset and worried about the convicted (and time served) paedophile moving into their neighbourhood, and probably because they have also been through so much anger and fear whilst gaining the much sort after facts, some of the most hot-headed of the local population marched straight to the address, and unfortunately for the paedophile he had just got back home.

Three of the locals knocked on his door, which he opened without hesitation, as he wasn't expecting a posse. They then barged in, and beat him up, breaking one of his wrists and his thumb and index finger. They also cracked four of his ribs, one of which then punctured which led to one of his lungs deflating. They also kicked him in the head now that he was on the floor, and two of them stamped on his crotch. By this time, someone - maybe one of his neighbours - had called the police, who actually arrived very quickly, and they were dragged off him, still screaming and trying to kick him.

One hour earlier in this Extreme Example:

One of the locals arrived in a hurry at the local pub - which they were using as their unofficial headquarters - they had the news the others had been waiting for, the name and address of the suspected paedophile! They didn't have any actual proof, but the timing was right, and their informant was definite that he was a paedophile, he had heard officials talking about him. One of the other people in the pub said, shouldn't we wait until we can confirm that this is the right person, but another one, who was louder, and had more clout said "oh for fuvks sake, come on, there's no smoke without fire, let's gather the others together and get around there before he gets tipped off!"

It was later that night that the arrested locals found out that they had beaten up the new local Paediatric Surgeon at the local hospital. He had been gossiped about earlier in the day because he came with such excellent credentials, and after the local Health Authority had been searching for a replacement surgeon for over nine months. His name and photo were going to be published in the local newspaper the next day, after interviewing him earlier in the day.

It took the paediatrician over a year before his hand and wrist injuries had healed enough for him to be able to operate safely and superbly again. But he had decided anyway, not long after his attack, that actually he didn't want to live and work there anymore, and he had an orthopod friend who had moved to Audtralia who told him that his working conditions and lifestyle were brilliant over there...

Three years later:

The local hospital were still getting local surgeons in when they could, otherwise the local children had to travel over 70 miles away whenever they needed an operation, which was then often cancelled once they got there, because of bed and staff shortages. It also turned out that it was a good decision on the part of the poor paediatrician, to actually move to the other side of the world, because even after all that time, when some of the locals were talking about him, one or two of them would say:
"you know I'm glad that paediatrician didn't stay here, as I couldn't have ever trusted him, seeings how there's no smoke without fire".

My example is obviously totally made up.
But in the past - at least once in the UK - a paediatrician was mistaken for a paedophile. I fervently hope that in reality nobody was stupid enough to think, never mind say about them "there's no smoke without fire".
I never want to write/type/hear that sentence ever again. But @MrsMikeDrop I would still be grateful if you can tell me what you consider are the positives about that particular phrase? Are my lights on, but no-one is at home? I will have to ask people who know me the answer to that question.

TimesRwo · 08/05/2023 12:01

TheLadyofShalott1 · 08/05/2023 11:39

I am so sorry that you are embarrassing yourself by showing your almost total lack of comprehension on what has been said between me and a few other PP's on this subject, on this thread @MrsMikeDrop, but I suppose the fact that we are all anonymous saves you from the even worse embarrassment of potentially almost the whole world knowing about it 🤭

I doubt that you have the foggiest idea why I am saying this, so I will try and explain more eloquently than I have sadly managed so far:

I understand the saying
"There's no smoke without fire", very well MrsMike, which is why I asked @Starlitestarbright on about page 2 to please - I hope I was polite and used the word "please" - not use that phrase.

My question to you MrsMike, although related, was not 'what does the phrase
"There's no smoke without fire" mean, but rather

'Can you explain to me please, why/how you think that the phrase

"There's no smoke without fire"

can be, in your own words, both "very useful and relevant"?

As I said much earlier in this thread, I think that that phrase has the potential to be very dangerous. Iam going to give you an extreme example now (which I sincerely hope doesn't lead to heated discussions about my choice of example. I know it is a very emotive subject, and probably not a very good choice for an example, but I am using it in the hope that more Mumsnetters - and particularly you in this instance MrsMike - will understand what I am saying, because they can understand the scenario...

ExtremeExample:

A rumour has come to light that a paedophile has been released from prison into the area, and is being housed in a bedsit within two blocks of the local Primary School.

So the local people are - IMO obviously and quite rightly - both furious and very worried about this, especially as no name, no photo, and no actual address has accompanied this frightening news. So lots of digging (figuratively speaking), and some mild (and some not so mild) cross questioning of local councillors, and harassment of the local police force, has taken place.

At last someone manages to get a name and address; now the person they have the name and address for, moved in last week, but strangely the address is in a much nicer block of flats - or apartments, as described by Estate Agencies - than they were expecting. But the irate locals brushed off that fact - if they thought about it at all - thinking "well no-one said that only poor people were paedophiles. As the incensed locals are so upset and worried about the convicted (and time served) paedophile moving into their neighbourhood, and probably because they have also been through so much anger and fear whilst gaining the much sort after facts, some of the most hot-headed of the local population marched straight to the address, and unfortunately for the paedophile he had just got back home.

Three of the locals knocked on his door, which he opened without hesitation, as he wasn't expecting a posse. They then barged in, and beat him up, breaking one of his wrists and his thumb and index finger. They also cracked four of his ribs, one of which then punctured which led to one of his lungs deflating. They also kicked him in the head now that he was on the floor, and two of them stamped on his crotch. By this time, someone - maybe one of his neighbours - had called the police, who actually arrived very quickly, and they were dragged off him, still screaming and trying to kick him.

One hour earlier in this Extreme Example:

One of the locals arrived in a hurry at the local pub - which they were using as their unofficial headquarters - they had the news the others had been waiting for, the name and address of the suspected paedophile! They didn't have any actual proof, but the timing was right, and their informant was definite that he was a paedophile, he had heard officials talking about him. One of the other people in the pub said, shouldn't we wait until we can confirm that this is the right person, but another one, who was louder, and had more clout said "oh for fuvks sake, come on, there's no smoke without fire, let's gather the others together and get around there before he gets tipped off!"

It was later that night that the arrested locals found out that they had beaten up the new local Paediatric Surgeon at the local hospital. He had been gossiped about earlier in the day because he came with such excellent credentials, and after the local Health Authority had been searching for a replacement surgeon for over nine months. His name and photo were going to be published in the local newspaper the next day, after interviewing him earlier in the day.

It took the paediatrician over a year before his hand and wrist injuries had healed enough for him to be able to operate safely and superbly again. But he had decided anyway, not long after his attack, that actually he didn't want to live and work there anymore, and he had an orthopod friend who had moved to Audtralia who told him that his working conditions and lifestyle were brilliant over there...

Three years later:

The local hospital were still getting local surgeons in when they could, otherwise the local children had to travel over 70 miles away whenever they needed an operation, which was then often cancelled once they got there, because of bed and staff shortages. It also turned out that it was a good decision on the part of the poor paediatrician, to actually move to the other side of the world, because even after all that time, when some of the locals were talking about him, one or two of them would say:
"you know I'm glad that paediatrician didn't stay here, as I couldn't have ever trusted him, seeings how there's no smoke without fire".

My example is obviously totally made up.
But in the past - at least once in the UK - a paediatrician was mistaken for a paedophile. I fervently hope that in reality nobody was stupid enough to think, never mind say about them "there's no smoke without fire".
I never want to write/type/hear that sentence ever again. But @MrsMikeDrop I would still be grateful if you can tell me what you consider are the positives about that particular phrase? Are my lights on, but no-one is at home? I will have to ask people who know me the answer to that question.

Oh for goodness sake, start your own thread!!!

Swipe left for the next trending thread