It's normal to have sex in a relationship, with someone you care about as part of a relationship. To show affection, to make them happy. I hated watching my partner in his rubbish band all those years ago. I went. How is this different?
It is normal to have consensual sex. Anything else is not normal.
The difference between sexual assault and seeing a partner's band you don't particularly care for is that one is causing physical and emotional harm, where going to a gig isn't.
I don't fully believe that most woman don't have sex when they don't want to because they care about their partner.
No, most women do not consent to sexual assault by their partners just to make them happy. You don't have to believe it, but it won't make it any less true and maybe you should start thinking about why you believe this hideous concept in the first place. Who taught you this?
The other group seemed to get loving someone means making sacrifices sometimes, with jobs, with the kids, free time, finances, all for a partner.
Loving someone never means sacrificing your bodily autonomy. Ever.
Compromise is for topics like what to have for lunch, where to go on holiday, how to manage spending - not who gets to control access to the woman's body.
Fighting. What is normal?
Physical contact is never normal. Not even "oh, I just grabbed his arm." That's horrifying that you think that's a regular occurrence!
I've been married 18 years and can count on one hand the number of times we have had an actual argument and those have never even once involved physical contact of any sort. Nor does it involve name calling, foul language, etc. as those things are over the line where it becomes verbal aggression.
We disagree about things weekly, but that's disagreeing and rational conversation, not arguing. There are no raised voices, and the focus is on the problem and the solution - not the other person.
If we were to actually argue any more frequently than we do, it would be too much. Yes, during times of stress one of us can be more waspish than normal, but you're right in that it is OK to make allowances for that kind of thing - as long as it ends, and it never escalates into physical violence, name calling, threats, profanity, etc. Once it becomes verbal aggression, it stops being something you make allowances for.
If you make allowances for the above, why does it only apply to verbal aggression?
A normal disagreement isn't verbal aggression. Anything that is verbal aggression is over the line and I wouldn't make allowances for that.
Isn't it selfish to always want things YOUR way?
Not when it comes to bodily autonomy and abuse. If it's something that causes mental or physical harm, you and no one else gets control. Compromising on dinner options doesn't cause mental or physical harm. Sexual assault does. That is why bodily autonomy is different.
Okay, so married couple, partner wants to move, the other doesn't. The one who would rather stay would be having to change jobs, move the kids, leave family. Is that okay?
This is where partners discuss and make compromises, working together on the problem and the solution. There's no parallel here with sexual assault.