Agree with bubblesbubbles11
Couldn’t disagree with this more -
“Throwing away her relationship is an overreaction probably based on the deep scars of her past that she is applying to the present.”
This is the type of thinking that has previously sane and trusting women turning the behaviour of others’ round onto themselves, doing half the work of a liar for him and trying to rationalise their partners’ poor behaviour til they drive themselves mad.
(On the other hand v. envious of anyone whose relationship history allows them this deep a sense of security! So genuinely bravo for that, you’re really fortunate)
Of course, it is right to ask oneself if it’s an overreaction etc initially. Sometimes the answer to that is “yes, it might be”. But if the person who you trust most doesn’t bother to understand and reassure etc when you react (or even overreact) to an event, then who cares? The “overreaction” ultimately becomes one, not to the inciting incident itself, but to the partners’ response. So it isn’t really an overreaction at all, but just a pretty typical reaction to what he is doing (eg. gaslighting)
And for what it’s worth my ex was not sexting or sharing or receiving nude photos - there was nothing overtly sexual going on.
But he was certainly consistently lying by omission, not protecting our relationship and habitually forming flirtatious relationships with other women and getting into mutually compulsively messaging with them. Until he moved in and began to display his hurtful behaviour in other ways as well, I wouldn’t have had a clue this was going on.
As far as he was concerned these were only friends and meant nothing to him. Quite clearly they would not have thought, from his messages and their frequency, that they meant nothing to him. Quite clearly he was enjoying the attention. Quite clearly part of the enjoyment was the secrecy.
There is a world of grey out there. I’d say the unifying indicator of poor and potentially hurtful behaviour is not the specifics, but the response to being questioned. There are posters here who may not have remembered a message or name, (we are only human) but at least tried to figure it out with and for their partner, and over time not just for two mins.
Instant denial = massive red flag.
The response I got when I asked if there was anything I should be concerned about was:
- ”don’t be absurd, I didn’t x, y, z - there’s nothing to know, there’s nothing going on”.
- ”you’re crazy/being ridiculous/have so much baggage/I didn’t think you were a jealous person”.
- “I love you, of course there’s nothing to worry about, why would I be here if I didn’t love you, I want to be with YOU”
Even when I had tangible proof everything wasn’t ok, I was still being told I was the only person in the world who would be upset in this situation, and that he wasn’t doing anything wrong because “they are only friends”.
It doesn’t sound to me as though OP has high tolerance for being treated like crap and lied to - and nor should she. She sounds very brave.
It also doesn’t sound to me as though the relationship is so far progressed (joint home/mortgage/children) that it’s worth seriously risking her emotional well-being.
Would love nothing more than to hear that Bethany is a ring designer and sent a picture of the engagement ring he has secretly acquired for OP! That would be fantastic. But unless he gets the idea pretty fast that the cover up (even if it’s well intended) isn’t worth the damage it’s doing her, and he finds a way to genuinely listen to her concerns and reassure her in a way that is meaningful to OP, then he’s probably just not the guy he seemed…
Men like this can be excellent at romance, and wonderful at manipulation. Getting dragged into that maelstrom can be very emotionally damaging, and lots of discussion can just take you further from your initial and intuitive sense of the situation.
We spend a lot of time thinking about things when we should trust our guts. I wish I had.