DP has been liking weird videos...

[uhmmm]

DP has been liking videos of what seems to look like women but with male bits if you know what I mean... could this be a joke? They only have a few hundred likes and he's liked lots of them. I'm starting to wonder hmm... I don't want to confront him but he's one of those that is over the top masculine, could it be a front?

I think Ive got new lines in my forehead trying to work out the logic of that post.

Yep! Total crackpot logic. The mind boggles

I don't use Twitter.

Is it easy to see if he's communicated with any of the video's uploaders or anyone else about the videos?

I suppose he'll have cleaned out/shut down his account now since op is upset & pushing for clarity .. and he's already got to the "swearing on the kid's life" point.

Is it feasible to check his browsing history and other activities or will it be locked down/deleted now too?

In my experience, anyone who swears on someone else's life is flat out lying.

What does it even mean?! It's not like the person being sworn on is going to drop dead, is it?! It's utter nonsense. It's emotive and distracting from whatever the issue is, but it doesn't mean anything. They may as well be swearing on the sofa. Or an apple pie.

The main reason hetero men are attracted to and aroused by women is that they don't have dicks & testicles, you know?

I'm more 🤨 from your comment. Genitals are mostly covered. If seeing genitals was a requirement for arousal and attraction, our habit of covering them up in public would put a real dampener on population growth.

Futanari is a thing.
I spent far too much of my youth exploring the dingier areas of the internet, but "dickgirls" (as they were known back then) were one of the more common fetishes amongst (mostly) straight men.

Oftentimes the porn involved a biological woman with a realistic prosthetic penis and synthetic "moneyshot".

I wouldn't be particularly surprised if the recent proliferation of transexuals mean that those men could get a more authentic fulfilment of that kink.

I'm not saying OP's husband is or isn't gay. I'm just saying that one-off enjoyment of porn featuring transwomen or "chicks with dicks" is not a sign of anything other than the behaviour.

I'm more 🤨 from your comment. Genitals are mostly covered. If seeing genitals was a requirement for arousal and attraction, our habit of covering them up in public would put a real dampener on population growth

Do people have sex clothed?

Also I didn't say genitals were the it thing that attracts or arouses people to the opposite sex ... And you must be v obtuse to assume I was. Buttocks and breasts obviously play a massive role ; read any adult work review, and buttocks can often be seen in clothing , and breasts are known to be essentially front buttocks from when our ancestors walked upright. In any case it is the absence of a dick and balls alongside buttocks and breasts (and general.looks, smaller, different hip to waist ratio etc) that constitutes hetero males identifying and being attracted to females. When at the sex stage the genitals - obviously in conjunction with buttocks - come into play. It is no coincidence most sex was from behind, and doggy continues to be a sure fire position for so many men.

You think a kink, a perversion, whatever you want to call it you've seen in porn and certain contexts is transexual is common among heterosexual men, I would t agree. It would be the minority. And it suggests things about their sexuality. As another poster said upthread, many heterosexual men are disgusted by and turned off by transsexual "women" and transvestites.

I'm just saying that one-off enjoyment of porn featuring transwomen or "chicks with dicks" is not a sign of anything other than the behaviour.

It's not one off ; he's watched and liked a large number of videos. That's repeated viewing, and expressing approval and enjoyment (and if I'm right the likes with his profile may also indicate a willingness to interact with the uploaders and other watchers).

But even if it was, I wouldn't agree with your assessment.

I find telling op this is common and harmless to be unfair and actually irresponsible.

You gave no idea if ops partner has or will escalate this behaviour, which others would not agree is common, and end up in the position of the poster above who's had to leave a man who was having sex with transexuals behind her back (and is v lucky if he didn't infect her with any STDs from it) and he's now married with two kids apparently doing the same thing to his second wife.

Maybe ops h isn't and wouldn't behave like that - or maybe he would. But op.epuld need to make very sure of that before she commits more time to him and continues having unprotected sex with him.

If you think it's normal and harmless fir a hetero married man with a child to be liking transexual porn videos on twitter, I worry about you, you shouldn't be pushing that on another woman who could be vulnerable.

Any kink is a minority interest by definition. Something can be both a common interest and a minority interest. An interest in "dickgirls" is pretty common.

In any case it is the absence of a dick and balls alongside buttocks and breasts (and general.looks, smaller, different hip to waist ratio etc) that constitutes hetero males identifying and being attracted to females.

So less about genitals and more about the traits that generally accompany those genitals?
What differentiates a transwoman, especially one that would feature in porn, from an average, bog-standard man?

I'm going to stop replying now.
Sorry OP, I think I got side-tracked and unintentionally derailed your thread.
I do hope you find a way through this, whatever that may be.