The sneeriness on here about cards, chocolates and flowers makes me chuckle - so many women bending over backwards to prove that they are somehow mysterious and special and thus above such "trite", "generic", "shameless commercial" gifts
I bloody love a bouquet of flowers and the fact that DH gets me one every year proves how well he knows me.
That's great but why can't you accept that someone else doesn't love a bouquet of flowers? And flowers would show how much a person didn't know them? It's not sneeriness. Its difference.
I personally do think that flowers and chocolates are unimaginative. To me, it's the equivalent of watching Saturday night telly because that's what people do; or blokes who go to the pub every Satirday to watch the football because that's what men do; or watching reality TV because that's what everyone does without actually applying any thought to it - is that what I like?
Commercialised romance.
To me, romance is about doing little things for someone that make them feel seen, heard and special. Things that show you've noticed them and want to make them feel cherished.
If flowers do that for you then that's great. They don't do it for me.
That's not because I'm 'cool' or denying myself something I'd secretly love. Its because i genuinely don't think that a bunch of flowers is the epitome of romance. It would say nothing about what a person knew of me.
Would I be rude or ungrateful? Of course not, but i would be a bit disappointed that they'd spent their money on flowers and not something that showed they really knew me.
I'm not sue why it's so hard for some people to understand that people like different things. And that's kinda the point...