I don’t know how the ‘ick’ found its way onto MN, but I wish it would leave via the same door it came in at. It isn’t based in any kind of fact and was never really meant to apply to women in long term relationships with children but to (usually) quite young women experimenting with different types of partners and different types of sex.
In my experience it is difficult to have a nuanced discussion about this on MN. I’m not trying to be critical of MN or its posters there - it’s just there are some areas that naturally bring out peoples defensiveness and this is one of them. But if we are to look at the raw sort of facts, there are better outcomes for children who come from children from a traditional family set up (children living with both their birth parents) and also non traditional family set ups where that’s been pre planned. So for example, children born to single mothers who have used sperm donors do well (statistically.) This contrasts with children from families where parents are single and it wasn’t pre planned (divorce) and although outcomes for bereaved children are overall favourable, when you break them into sub groups they are less so. Most bereaved children lose their father. In cases where bereaved children lose the mother, blended families soon follow (please understand I’m talking very generally here!) and then the outcomes aren’t so good.
The problem with stats is that a lot of the time we look at them and think they just don’t apply to us. Over the page I have an example of a child who is in many ways I’d say the typical product of divorce and subsequent remarriage or new relationships and chances are she wouldn’t ring any alarm bells at all. She’s under achieved at school a bit but she still did OK, and after all, her parents divorced at ten - her school work flagged after that so she wouldn’t necessarily be identified as not having reached her potential. She sees both her parents regularly and on the surface has a good relationship with both. It looks like a functioning blended family and her parents will probably say how happy she is and she is actually relieved they split up.
I think this is a fairly common setup and one the resident parent can't prevent, the other parent can go off and start a new family and show they will stay with this lot of children right through to adulthood whereas the last lot of children get to visit and witness what could have been. And in cases where the resident parent also has a new partner and children - step or birth - this feeling of displacement is heightened. And bear in mind that’s functioning families. There’s a darker and more sinister side but I’m working on the assumption we aren’t talking about that here.
My own thoughts here are that I don’t feel a relationship where the ‘love’ has gone is necessarily the worst thing in the world, providing it is tempered by at least liking, friendship, mutual respect and care. After all, many of us will have applied that same logic to jobs - I’m not convinced I’m living the dream with my job, but if I left it tomorrow to fulfil my potential and live my dreams I’d ultimately lose everything that really does matter. Adults do not-fun things all the time.
If we work on the assumption that romantic love and finding it and keeping it is the only way to be really ‘you’ I think that’s wrong, I can’t speak for everybody but many posters have come on to say that they lived with a man who didn’t excite them but didn’t abuse them, was great with the children, but the unhappiness that led to was overwhelming, which I do find really odd. For my part I feel you more able to express my authentic self than if I was single and became a penniless single parent with no evening childcare and therefore could not exercise or go to your karate club or play in your orchestra or work on your novel or whatever it is you do.
And I do find this assumption childish, if I’m totally honest here. Perhaps because I was young when I was obsessed with having a boyfriend and now I am older I am more interested in my children, my security for myself and for them, being fulfilled at work, and various other things. It is up to individuals what they do but I think telling them their children WILL be happier (and the more extreme version, that not to do so is actually making the children unhappy) and that they will enter a new phase of their lives, is wrong.