The vast majority of people (usually men) labelled as paedophiles are child sex abusers, and are not true paedophiles.
They have relationships and sex with adults as well as the children they sexually assault/rape a d their typical profile is an attached man, usually a father, in employment and often a church member.
They are (possibly sociopathic/psychopathic) exploitative individuals with a lack of integrity, boundaries and conscience.
True paedophiles are only attached to children; romantically and sexually. They might still enter into relationships and have sex with adults but it's not their real inclination. Differences have been observed in their brains, eg a lack of normal development in a part of the brain I've forgotten the name of.
This sounds like I think it's not their fault (it isn't I suppose) but to the contrary I think.the hard wired, innate nature of it makes them both dangerous and pretty untreatable (until we can replace faulty brain parts, which will no doubt cause ethical debate).
People use the word peadophile when they mean child sex abuser all the time a d that confuses matters.
Then there's the (purposeful and opportunistic) confusion created around child sex abuse and sexual orientation .. two men (a priest and a head school teacher) have gotten off extremely lightly for sex with underage young men, boys really (teen-agers) in my local area because they said their behaviour was caused by their confusion and struggle with coming out. Funnily enough my gay mate had similiar confusion and struggle but managed to.only have sex with other adult gay men whose consent was possible.
If the person is under the age of consent, it's sex abuse