For anyone who'd like to take the class Sociopath (or is that psychopath?) 101, I have summarised some of grindergirl's (who says she's a 64 year old woman) "best" soundbites below;
*My grandson and his friend (both mid-twenties and with GFs) visited a prostitute apiece when they were in Amsterdam…. No condemnation on my part …
I only jokingly berated him for wasting his money.
Some people earn with their hands, some with their heads, some with their vaginas.
Part of the problem when we are younger (at least as I see it) is that we are often too curious about the Bf or Gf's sexual past and make comparisons about the ex in our heads. The op is not likely to run into the foreign prostitute whereas she might if an ex-gf was in her own town.
The moral compass isn't fixed. Nor should it be. Men have fallen for the charms of fallen women since time immemorial. What would stop you feeling disgusted, op? Maybe going together to see a performance of Verdi's La Traviata. It might help you feel more sympathetic towards prostitutes and the men who visit them.
Nobody here seems to consider that some women stumble into prostitution through a lack of self-esteem. The desire to be wanted is entrenched in human nature. Too many dumpings and a gal might think: aw, fuck it. Do it for love, do it for money---what's the difference.
Poverty is undoubtedly the key factor over there but a girl who is able to support a family back in the village through her 'work'' would be seen as a valuable asset. Who sends them to Bangkok and other big cities? Not traffickers.
Different cultures and attitudes can't always be adapted to suit many westerners' ideas of morality.
As for my own granddaughters, no, of course I wouldn't encourage them into a life of prostitution. But if they ever reckoned the game was worth the candle, it's not something I would condemn. We all live by our own rules---or at least we should.
I never answered the question about who does the trafficking in Thailand. From people I talked to, it's mostly the families.
Giving birth to a pretty daughter in really impoverished parts of the country such as Isaan can be like winning the lottery
… for those who didn't live through the early '70s, it wasn't so much free love. It was simply recreational sex. That's why I'm not hung up about who shoves what where.
Marriage doesn't make sense to me.
Also that there's no point joining a library (i.e. life) if you're only going to read one book.
If a commitment has been made, can't see much degree of difference between shagging a prostitute, a co-worker or a random stranger met in a bar.
It's only in the past few decades that there has been this outcry that all humans should be of equal value. The idea is balderdash.
The rich have always exploited the poor, and sex has always been a commodity for sale. That won't change, so it seems a waste of emotion to get in a strop about the lives of the faceless billions and the limited choices they have. Everyone in life is dealt different cards.
I'm glad I grew up in an age where it wasn't deemed necessary to display fake empathy.
Believing that all people are of equal value has become an imposed belief, not a natural one.
The powerful (and I have no power over anyone) have more advantages than the majority of us, even in a western democracy. Who can blame them for using those advantages? They would be mad not to.
I'd take issue with the bleating that many overseas women engage in prostitution to survive. The typical peasant lifestyle in SE Asia is unpleasant and gruelling, but it has existed for generations. People do actually survive it. It doesn't pay for shoes or pretty clothes or a motorbike for your brother, though. It's not a case of survival, it's more a hankering for material trappings..
Panama is arguably the wealthiest country in Central America, but you'll 'still find yourself knee-deep in local hookers. Luxury hotels such as the Sheraton in Panama City are a particular magnet. I very much doubt they're all doing it to ''survive''.*