It’s taken me half the day but I think I’ve just written the best response to an email ever.
I have changed some details (though tbh at this point, if anyone I know was to read any of this, I’d be outed in minutes). Never mind.
What do you think?
...
I would ask you, once again, to exclude any personal comments from your correspondence as it makes it difficult to identify the pertinent matters and respond in a timely fashion.
I also insist that you refrain from any further attempts at emotional blackmail or gaslighting.
Regarding the holidays:
Are you taking the kids to Timbuktu?
If so, when and for how long are you taking them?
Are you allowing them to attend the bbq?
If so, in what capacity are you prepared to facilitate it?
What do you need from me to help facilitate it?
(Party invite for me, bf and dc from one of our closest friends, on an evening of his weekend. He’d originally said before the invite that he wanted to take them away, then afterwards said they could go, as I thought it was a possibility I told them, then said he might or might not allow it. Dc want to go).
There are 4 days from your original request I haven’t agreed.
I agreed to your request for a 10 day break which includes one of my weekend days.
You agreed to allow us to go for a short break which includes one of your weekend days.
My suggestion regarding ad hoc visits was to allow some flexibility for further planning but, as its unworkable at your end, I will withdraw the offer and conclude communication on the matter of the holidays.
(Pretty self explanatory. I’d suggested having some additional days might be possible at shorter notice. He seemed to take offence that I thought when he’d said he was flexible about days, he was in fact flexible about days)
As to your other comments; the facts are:
You decided to relocate an hour away.
You chose to start a family.
You requested, and the court granted your request, to cut contact on xday afternoons.
You chose to stop picking DS up from club on ydays.
You reduced your zday contact.
You stopped eating tea with them on weekdays.
You demanded a child welfare report. Until then, the dc’s were not involved.
I had no input into these decisions. Your perception that I am punishing you is incorrect. (Toyed with saying ... either narcissism or paranoia. But stopped myself)
I’m not to blame for any damage to your relationship with the dc’s.
Do you accept any responsibility for your actions and the consequences they’ve caused?
As is their right, the dc’s are informed of anything which directly affects them, their family and living situation. Their questions are answered with honesty, in an age appropriate manner. They don’t always get what they want, but they are listened to, their opinions are valued and their feelings are respected.
I take full responsibility for any actions and decisions I have made and will continue to make in the future with the same remit; I will do what I believe to be in the best interests of the dc’s.
After the changes to their established routines, their opinions have been made clear and the negative effects are proof that it is not in their best interests to continue.
You chose to deny their direct requests and the requests I’ve made on their behalf to return to the stability of that established routine; and ignored the letter sent from my solicitor.
The negative effects are exhibited by the general decline in their behaviour, which has been noted at school; their physical health with the recurrence of DS’s constipation; their mental health with the emotional outbursts by DD, most notably leading up to and during weekend handovers and by them both before and after extended stays with you at both Christmas and Easter holidays.
...
Rip it to shreds if need be because I want it to hit him right in the bollocks without having anything he can jump on.
Bedtime now mn angels
Night night x