I agree with cogito . So many posters are telling the OP how they woudl think /feel . What they think is ok /not ok
That's not really relevant - it's what she cares about that counts. She said down the thread that she was ok with him going but not " partaking " . She then said she meant that it was ok for him to buy drinks but not pay for dances or private services . I'm not sure if she meant it was ok for him to pay for others to get these services but not ok for him to do it himself
Lots of other posters have made similar distinctions eg look but don't touch . Some posters seem to see it as " a bit of a laugh " , others as inevitable male behaviour Or legitimate entertainment , while some see it as a form of cheating
Later on the Op seems to have changed her mind because she says itS sexist and tacky and him just going makes her angry .of course it's fine for her to change her views, but don't attack me because I'm responding to what she posted at first, and not what she says later
And don't accuse me of being aggressive for actually ASKING the op what she thinks rather than telling her what she should think and feel
I have no idea why I'm being " accused " of being a man for pointing out that , unless she and her DH have agreed their own boundaries , how is he to know how she feels about it ?
Theres a big range of views of this thread . How was the OPs Husband meant to know what his wife would and woudl not be ok with ? She's not even sure herself !
Where I work its very clear . Going with clients to any such venue woudl be a disciplinary matter. It wouldn't matter who paid and what they paid for . What they drank or watched or touched . It would be seen as bringing the company into disrepute . Ditto putting porn or prostitues through expenses. Either for the employee or clients. So we know where we stand