ok.
the videos were made my 2 consenting adults - so no offence there.
the videos do not identify the OP.
the videos do not break any laws on obscenity or public decency.
so lets go down the harassment route - are the police seriously supposed to issue a harassment warning to the OPs partner - they LIVE together - a harassment warning would effectively stop him for communicating with her in any way. What good is that? they LIVE together, they are IN a relationship with each other, they have a life together and children together - at this stage a harassment warning would be the biggest waste of paper ever produced.
so lets look at harassment law - the "suspect" has to have undertaken a course of conduct (so more than 1 occasion) that is likely to be seen by any reasonable person as harassment. Do you any of you seriously think the CPS would run a case like this where the couple are still together and in a committed relationship of 18 years?
if she left him - and IF he contacted her then and she didnt want that then that would constitute harassment - but really the harassment laws were brought in to deal with stalkers - people who would no leave an ex alone - calls, texts, following them, sending presents or anything that the victims construes as unwanted attention - HOW does this situation fit any of that?
and please inform me as to how this is in any way shape or form an assault??????
the very minimum category of assault is a section 39 - often referred to as "assault by beating". He has not laid a hand on her - he has not forced or coerced her into making the tapes. they were both willing participants - for any assault there has to be a "force" applied - that does not mean force used - it means actually touched another person - so even an unwanted touch can be assault - BUT this is not about an unwanted contact, or unwanted touching/pushing/hitting.
there is no legislation that covers this - yes police may try to scrape the barrel by making harassment law fit, but cyber bullying is totally totally different - and comes under different laws such as malicious communications - again - not crime recordable.
Please, could the lawyer tell me as the stupid cop on what grounds police would have any authority to act - to arrest this man?
to interview him to obtain evidence by questioning?
what would he be charged with? its not assault. its not harassment.
how would the OP be identified in the video - would she have to strip and show the cops dealing her marks and scars so they can be sure its her in the video? evidence is needed - anyone can say anything about anyone - proof would be needed that it was even the OP in the video - how could you verify that????!!!???
How can you say its assault by putting her in fear of harm? from who?? Cammy? (who posted he wants to pump her rotten....) - so how likely is that REALLY to happen?? does he know her name, or where she lives? Are police really expected to go and arrest or interview someone for something that hasnt actually happened but might happen in a parallel universe even though its very very highly unlikely because "cammy" or his ilk would need to be psychic to even find out who she is??,is she named, or exposed to real or probable risk of physical harm in any way?? the lawyers at the crown prosecution service would laugh that out of the office. No one knows who she is on those sites - its horrible, yes, men leering and using what should be a private video to wank over - awful - criminal?? not in THIS instance.
people yelling "police" is the most ridiculous thing ive read on here in a long time.
there are absolutely no criminal offence that fits in this particular scenario where the partners are still partners, living together, as a couple.
would OP want her life partner criminalised, ( if there were?)
to what aim? lose his job? then what - they lose the roof over their heads? go to food banks? just to satisfy a bunch of total strangers on the net??? the mans an idiot - but he made a saucy sex tape and did the 21st century equivalent of showing it to his mates - its awful, its crass, its insensitive, its stupid,
The man may be a daft git, its gross, its upsetting, but its NOT CRIMINAL in THIS CASE.
There is nothing the police could realistically do with this set of circumstances. Each case is different - each case looked at on its merits but this is not cyber bullying, or harassment, or assault, or malicious comms.
its awful. its unforgivable.
its not criminal on the face of it in this instance.
and i doubt very much that making a sex tape means that suddenly the OPs partner of 18 years is some raging predatory pervert about to prey on innocent young students....men from all walks of life do stupid things and use porn. There would be no grounds what so ever to start to dissect this mans life, or for that matter, his computer.
if we lived in the kind of police state that this would warrant i doubt anyone would be advocating reporting it.