ham DH and I LOVE LOVE LOVE The Oatmeal! So funny, but so wrong 
Miggins I saw that Times cover online this morning and my only thought is one of cynicism - namely that they chose such a slender, blonde, pretty mother to pose. I know that she really is breastfeeding her child at that age, but don't think it would have got on a cover had she been fat, dowdy and not pretty.
Also, that pose with the child standing on a chair is hardly the one they use at home when feeding, so I don't understand why the mag shot that one. Surely it would have been better to show a natural pose? The one they used just makes extended bfing seem odd.
I bf DS till he was 11 months, and I never was shy about doing it in public. But he's always been really tall and when he was 11 months he looked about 2! His legs used to dangle way down when I bf him at a cafe (for example) and used to almost 'kick' people as they tried to walk past! Lol! He was only young, but likely looked much older and I'm sure some people looked at me odd and thought I was feeding a toddler.
I do plan to bf this next child for longer, but think that's mainly as he/she will likely be my last baby and I want to cling on to that.... maybe, not 100% yet.