Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Is anyone watching this Trump car crash?

1000 replies

soundsys · 02/04/2025 21:36

WTF is happening? It’s like some bizarre performance art piece.

He’s holding up signs and shouting and throwing out hats it’s just 🤯

OP posts:
Thread gallery
47
Igotjelly · 10/04/2025 22:49

Looking at the graphs it really does look like there was a bump shortly before Trump announced he was pausing the tariffs. Looks suspiciously like at least some people had a heads up.

llizzie · 10/04/2025 22:51

StandFirm · 10/04/2025 20:00

This should be rephrased: 'put some Americans first' 'make some Americans richer'

I think he is showing signs of paranoia. All the world is wrong, only he is right.

He may still be ''drunk'' with the success of his winning the election. Whatever it is, he is showing distinct signs of an unbalanced mind.

Should world governments sign any sort of contract with him? I wouldn't. I think they should ask for a certificate of clear mental health before they sign anything with him.

I wonder if that is why he has given the world a 90 day reprieve?

llizzie · 10/04/2025 22:53

Slimbear · 10/04/2025 15:12

President Trump announced a 90-day pause on tariffs for most countries, reducing them to a universal rate of 10%, while increasing tariffs on Chinese imports to 125%. This decision was made to facilitate trade negotiations and respond to market concerns following previous tariff announcements.

Errrrr so what's this about - I thought everyone was queuing up to bargain with Trump over the tariffs but now there is a 90 day pause. And its for 'most' countries and making them 10% but after the 90 days what? some will be higher tariffs, some lower. Was listening to Bloomberg channel yesterday and the interviewed were not amused.

Perhaps a psychiatric report takes 90 days?

Justsaynonow · 10/04/2025 22:53

TulipTiptoer · 10/04/2025 12:32

Canadian travel to US is down by 13% for air travel, and a mighty 23% for land travel.
Trump certainly knows how to win! 😂

(p.s. this is not a conspiracy theory, it is fact by Statistics Canada and just for March. It is expected to have dropped even more when they release latest figures)

It's actually 32% for land travel
https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada-us-travel-fears-1.7506048

Canadian travel to the U.S. has plummeted. One reason why: fear | CBC News

The number of return trips among Canadians travelling to the U.S. has plummeted. Some travellers are cancelling plans due to concern over beefed up border security following the Trump administration's pledge to crackdown on immigration.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada-us-travel-fears-1.7506048

llizzie · 10/04/2025 22:55

StandFirm · 10/04/2025 20:00

This should be rephrased: 'put some Americans first' 'make some Americans richer'

I was quoting his own words, but I see what you mean.

llizzie · 10/04/2025 22:58

Serpentstooth · 10/04/2025 15:21

He needs 90 days for the arse-kissing queue to line up and approach, preferably on their naked bellies over broken glass. I expect the rest of the world will be begging to approach this Prince of Diplomacy by then, in tribute to Bigly for all he's done.

...and an MRI, psychiatric report, brain scan........

Justsaynonow · 10/04/2025 23:03

And despite his claims that egg prices are down 73%, facts disagree:
U.S. egg prices increased again last month to reach a new record-high average of $6.23 US per dozen.

TulipTiptoer · 11/04/2025 07:11

Justsaynonow · 10/04/2025 22:53

Probably updated figures, yes 🙂
The tourist industry is going to be decimated. That was a question in the senate the other day about it.
We go once a year to the States, we are just not going now. Our American friends quite understand, they are scared shirtless.

MushMonster · 11/04/2025 07:28

Musk comments annoy me quite a bit too. Now he is pro zero tariffs between US and Europe. Just like that. In the middle of all this. After Trump has insulted Zelensky, abandoned Ukraine (including intelligence sharing!), sided with Russia better than if Trump was Putin himself, insulted most of the PM that visited him saying we abuse US and we do not pay our share, claimed Greenland, sent JD Vance there, destroyed NATO, forced Europe into re-arming and so on and on....
Now we have to also kiss his ass and engage in free tariffs..... So he can then change his mind and screw our lives whenever he feels like? Again? And, of course, they must think that no tariffs means they can sell whatever... nothing to worry about the ingredients that are banned in Europe...
Only an idiot would ever trust anything to the US at this point and near future. Sad as it is.

Alexandra2001 · 11/04/2025 07:31

llizzie · 10/04/2025 22:51

I think he is showing signs of paranoia. All the world is wrong, only he is right.

He may still be ''drunk'' with the success of his winning the election. Whatever it is, he is showing distinct signs of an unbalanced mind.

Should world governments sign any sort of contract with him? I wouldn't. I think they should ask for a certificate of clear mental health before they sign anything with him.

I wonder if that is why he has given the world a 90 day reprieve?

Senior people who worked with DT in 2016 - 2020, have said he is suffering from some form of cognitive impairment.

His actions and words certainly back this up.

Mielikki · 11/04/2025 07:38

Tomatotater · 10/04/2025 09:18

Yes I read that China own most US bonds. So what happens if they just sell them all? Does the US economy just collapse? If so, Trump is playing an extremely stupid game, and he has surrounded himself with fanboys, yes men and conspiracy theorists from Fox News who have no idea what they are doing. Have we, as other countries, done anything at all to prevent the collapse of the US economy/ US debt causing another global financial crash? I suspect all the banks have talked a good talk but have not done much to change.

If they sell them all that pushes up the yield (the effective interest rate) which means that if the Us wants to issue new bonds it will have to do so at higger interest rates (because why would you buy new issue bonds that pay a lower rate of interest than ones already on the market?)

Even worse is if China etc don’t re-invest in US treasuries as their existing holdings mature. They just take their money elsewhere and cut off the US’s line of credit.

Serpentstooth · 11/04/2025 07:43

You're not wrong. That leaves Bigly's mate Putin as a potential major investor. Fun times.

Serpentstooth · 11/04/2025 09:06

Well of course she did. And as many friends and family as could be found did too. This is what happens when you put a mafia in charge of your nation. Good luck USA, you're going to need it.

1dayatatime · 11/04/2025 09:12

So to possess insider information is not a criminal offence, to make public insider information is not a criminal offence (although it may be a breach of any confidentiality contract).

To act on any insider information for personal gain (even if you actually end up making a loss) is a criminal offence. Passing that insider information to someone else to financially gain is also a criminal offence.

https://news.sky.com/story/trump-tariffs-stock-markets-china-trade-war-latest-live-13209921?postid=9419491#liveblog-body

Tariffs latest: China raises tariffs on US to 125% in trade war escalation

Asian stocks were on track for their worst week since the 2008 financial crash after US markets closed down yesterday - though European markets are faring better. Meanwhile, Donald Trump faces accusations of insider trading - listen to Trump 100 as you...

https://news.sky.com/story/trump-tariffs-stock-markets-china-trade-war-latest-live-13209921?postid=9419491#liveblog-body

AzurePanda · 11/04/2025 09:16

Well Nancy Pelosi and a number of other Democrats were rampant insider traders so no change there. Personally I think the lot of them should be barred from buying stocks and shares while in office.

Alexandra2001 · 11/04/2025 09:21

AzurePanda · 11/04/2025 09:16

Well Nancy Pelosi and a number of other Democrats were rampant insider traders so no change there. Personally I think the lot of them should be barred from buying stocks and shares while in office.

Evidence?

lawpluslaw · 11/04/2025 09:23

The problem with @1dayatatime is that they are able to synthesise only enough AI generated economic information to regurgitate it, but not enough to apply it to real world situations. Like most Russian stooges, they're useful because they overestimate their own intellect.

In the real world there is an economic model in which tariffs and devaluing the dollar reduce/eliminate trade deficits and solve the US debt. But they don't seem to understand that even people who espouse that model (who, outside of Peter Navarro, can be counted on two hands) tend to agree that you can't accomplish it the way he's going about it. If your method is to throw random tariffs on, raise them randomly, take them off randomly, raise them again randomly, pause them randomly, lengthen the pause randomly, shorten the pause randomly, you have no hope of accomplishing any goal other than chaos. Which, of course, suits certain global actors. Trump may not be guilty of insider trading, but he's guilty of manipulating the markets which he and those around him understood very clearly he had the ability to do and which he did in plain sight.

lawpluslaw · 11/04/2025 09:29

Alexandra2001 · 11/04/2025 09:21

Evidence?

Those are allegations that are thrown around a lot with no evidence.

However, Pelosi is very wealthy. Her husband is a venture capitalist who manages their investments and they say she is completely walled off from his business. However, like the Trump family, who have enriched themselves many times over during his time in politics, she is in a position to have inside knowledge that could potentially have an impact.

While I trust Nancy Pelosi a million times more than the orange mafia cabal, I do agree with @AzurePanda that members of congress should be barred across the board from stock trading while in office.

AzurePanda · 11/04/2025 09:39

Nancy Pelosi’s personal market investments have consistently outperformed every major hedge fund. She managed a return of 54% in 2024 alone from memory. Quite the achievement. Her personal wealth (independent of her husband’s) is extraordinary.

AzurePanda · 11/04/2025 09:45

There’s endless articles about it and it isn’t just her. It’s an outrage from both sides of the house.

Is anyone watching this Trump car crash?
lawpluslaw · 11/04/2025 09:49

AzurePanda · 11/04/2025 09:39

Nancy Pelosi’s personal market investments have consistently outperformed every major hedge fund. She managed a return of 54% in 2024 alone from memory. Quite the achievement. Her personal wealth (independent of her husband’s) is extraordinary.

Well, you can rest easy as I'm quite sure the now completely partisan SEC and DOJ will be set to investigating her soon, as they are now doing with everyone who has ever dared criticise the orange buffoon. However, I do agree with you in general, that elected officials should be banned from trading stocks and shares while in office and probably for a period of time after they leave.

AzurePanda · 11/04/2025 09:52

Well that’s my point. It’s both sides.

TopPocketFind · 11/04/2025 09:53

Pelosi shouldn't be difficult to investigate as there are some many articles written about her stock market trading

TopPocketFind · 11/04/2025 09:55

AzurePanda · 11/04/2025 09:52

Well that’s my point. It’s both sides.

Has there been another president posting 'advice' just before taking action?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread