[quote TheReluctantPhoenix]@rrhuth,
So the rise in the investment bankers’ remuneration (current first year analyst average income £86k) was all based on productivity, and yet, despite the increase in driving and monitoring technology, HGV drivers’ productivity has been static for years…
And wage growth was clearly not capped by cheap Eastern European labour? It is just that they work harder than the ‘lazy’ Brits who would not be prepared to do the job for any salary or working conditions.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, a balanced article from a very pro EU group of economists:
cebr.com/reports/the-times-labour-shortage-is-forcing-pay-up-but-how-long-can-it-last/[/quote]
In many of the lowest paid sectors it is very hard to raise productivity due to the nature of the work. Driving and monitoring technology will only make marginal differences as productivity is limited mainly by the speed of deliveries. Producity will not increase much until we replace drivers with fully autonomous vehicles.
Similarly in the care sector you can't make many efficiencies and raise productivity much as it is so labour intensive. In retail there might be more scope e.g moving to a model more like lidl with lower staffing. You can see this happening in many supermarkets with the loss of deli and butchery staff.
Ultimately increased productivity leads to the loss of many jobs e.g strawberry picking becomes automated. Whether or not this is a bad thing depends on your perceptive. Long term there may be a rational for a universal basic income to replace these jobs.
In the short term a labour shortage will put many smaller UK companies which are unable to afford to invest in upskilling or productivity out of business. This is expected in parts of the food production industry and will result in greater imports and food insecurity.