Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Petitions and activism

Piddington Roars

482 replies

dreamingofgoodhair · 21/08/2026 03:31

Can I draw your attention to this please ?
A village of 400 people in Oxfordshire, the government want to house 1200 migrants in an old RAF barracks nearby. No consultation and no infrastructure to support.
Before anyone accuses me of being racist, my family make up negates that.

https://thevillagethatroared.org/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
BoredZelda · 21/08/2026 13:59

Blondetter · 21/08/2026 13:31

So why are the police so coy when it comes to releasing ethnic minority stats for those who commit these crimes? I think we all know.

Do we all know? I think you might think you know, but as far as I can tell there could be a few reasons they still aren’t doing it.

A) the police don’t want the public to know about an epidemic of crime by ethnic minorities. - Unlikely, because surely it would benefit them to make it public, or at least have it factored into government policy on immigration.

B) the police are being pressured by government not to release these data. - Possible, but that would mean every government of every colour has done this for decades. Wouldn’t the Boris/Braverman era tories have benefitted from this if immigrant crime was a huge issue? Perhaps they realised the figures wouldn’t benefit them and asked to keep them quiet, who knows?

C) the police in publishing this data would face public scrutiny, from both ends of the political scale. If the figures show, for example, that a much larger number of immigrants were being stopped, searched and arrested, it would lead to further accusations of institutional racism, or “two tier policing” - This seems plausible, and further, if the number of those arrests resulting in a conviction would be liable to question too and whether it was more or less than average for the country in general, someone has questions to answer.

D) the police are aware that in publishing these data, it could lead to further unrest in the country at a time when race relations are a powder keg. Statistics will be taken by either side to support their cause, and the complexities of reporting crime (particularly in sexual assault cases), of bias in investigating and prosecuting these cases from start to finish will be ignored. - This also seems plausible. In my anecdotal experience, whenever a report is put out on SM by local police forces and the ethnicity isn’t mentioned, the comments are flooded with “doctor or engineer” or veiled racist tropes, suggesting our women and girls are not at all safe, all whilst making no mention of the victim of the crime. They are conspicuous by their absence when later in the day someone points out it was a local white man who has been arrested. I don’t think anyone can argue that any crime by and non white person is taken as an invitation to brand an entire culture in the way we don’t do with white individuals.

E) the police are just really shit at capturing data. Paperwork is filled in too quickly, never properly completed, potential out of a boredom of it, or because they have so damned much of it to do. - Knowing a few police officers and hearing their tales of paperwork woe, this is plausible too.

F) another reason I haven’t thought of, feel free to add yours.

I have no idea what the real reason is. I suspect it’s a combination of C, D & E, but until someone actually tells us, I don’t think we’ll ever know.

Paganpentacle · 21/08/2026 14:03

LakieLady · 21/08/2026 13:58

If they're undocumented, how does anyone know what culture they're from?

We have eyes and ears.

Datafan55 · 21/08/2026 14:04

LakieLady · 21/08/2026 13:53

I'm increasingly alarmed by number of people who appear very willing to lock up people who haven't broken any laws.

Makes me wonder what other fundamental human rights they'd like to abandon.

I'm more interested in the human right of a teenage girl to walk her family dog in the evening without getting attacked.
And we not throwing them in cave with no food and water.
Please stop gaslighting.

Datafan55 · 21/08/2026 14:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BoredZelda · 21/08/2026 14:06

ApricotCrush · 21/08/2026 13:38

To the 32% who think that this is reasonable. What is wrong with you? Can you not see what is happening to this country? Why should patriotic law-abiding working people be taxed to the hilt only to see their hard earned money spent on economic migrants who only come here for what they get from the Government and have no respect for our law, culture, religion, women or children. All the amenities in this country are falling apart, we are £3 trillion in debt, and yet we can throw money at men who will not contribute anything to our economy.

And to those who are asking where these men should be housed, they should not be housed anywhere, they should be sent straight back to where they came from, i.e. France, to whom we are paying millions to do absolutely nothing. Or better still they should be turned around before they even land here.

Hang on, aren’t we a nation of scroungers and PIP claimants, lazy and workshy? Now we are patriotic and law-abiding, working hard to pay taxes for….I guess…billions in pensions for those who “worked hard all their lives” (as well as those who have retired from being workshy and lazy in the 80s and 90s)

I can’t keep up!

BoredZelda · 21/08/2026 14:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

None of those are given to asylum seekers either.

EasternStandard · 21/08/2026 14:08

Datafan55 · 21/08/2026 14:04

I'm more interested in the human right of a teenage girl to walk her family dog in the evening without getting attacked.
And we not throwing them in cave with no food and water.
Please stop gaslighting.

Any view on this @BoredZeldaand others keen for barracks nearby to them.

LakieLady · 21/08/2026 14:08

bananaobama · 21/08/2026 12:39

It’s been totally fine in Crowborough. Save for the local racists protesting every weekend and blocking the roads

Although on the plus side, I've found a very scenic cross-country route to my SIL's in Tunbridge Wells that avoids Crowborough entirely!

JudgeJ · 21/08/2026 14:10

MildlyMoist · 21/08/2026 12:02

I have lived close to an army base in the countryside. Squaddies are not known for being quiet neighbours who are respectful of women and never cause any issues when they’re off base. But we house them there anyway.

Any poor behaviour by the Army personnel would have been jumped on by the Red Caps or other Army authorities, a phone call was all it used to take.

Paganpentacle · 21/08/2026 14:12

BoredZelda · 21/08/2026 14:07

None of those are given to asylum seekers either.

yes... they do get those things.

Bollihobs · 21/08/2026 14:13

BoredZelda · 21/08/2026 13:13

50% of people granted asylum in the U.K. are women/children.

A little thought experiment for you. Your home is in danger of being bombed, you have to leave. 150 miles up the road, there is a refugee camp, but you don’t know anyone in the area. You have no connections, and the camp is known to be a pretty awful place. If you go there with your family it could be years you are there, no hope for returning any time soon, you have 2 school age children. You have people you know in Sweden and you speak the language. You could go there and start afresh, get a job, get your children in to school and give them a future. The only way to get there is to make a 600 mile journey on foot by land, then take a boat to Sweden. It might take a few attempts but you think you can do it. There is nowhere near you to apply for a travel visa.

Do you:
A) All travel together, make the long, arduous, treacherous journey to Sweden with two small children in tow, not knowing where the next meal/resting place is available.
B) All stay in the refugee camp, risking disease, no education for your children, no opportunity to provide for your family, and hope you get back home quickly enough so your children’s entire future isn’t damaged.
C) Send the strongest most capable of the group, allowing them to make the journey to somewhere you can get set up, have access to an embassy to get your family the correct travel visas and make their own asylum claims, and enough money to join you in a safer way?

If you pick A or B, you are a liar or an idiot.

Surely the other obvious option is 'stay and fight to stop the bombing and make your country safe again' ? No? You really only list one option - the option of leaving, just with different destinations.

Evacuating children has always happened and women to some extent too but you'd be also an idiot and a liar to say that the demographic of "asylum seekers" isn't now vastly younger men. The demographic that surely should be standing up for and fighting for liberty and freedom in their homeland for the sake of all it's occupants? Wouldn't that be what you'd want to do, fight back and re-establish the rule of law etc. and make your homeland safe and secure again?

EasternStandard · 21/08/2026 14:13

BoredZelda · 21/08/2026 14:07

None of those are given to asylum seekers either.

You don’t think accommodation, healthcare, heating, transport and food is provided?

BoredZelda · 21/08/2026 14:14

Datafan55 · 21/08/2026 14:04

I'm more interested in the human right of a teenage girl to walk her family dog in the evening without getting attacked.
And we not throwing them in cave with no food and water.
Please stop gaslighting.

If you are for human rights for one, you are for human rights for all. None of those rights are contradictory. If a government decides it can lock up one group of people without any crime being committed, you are relying on that government never to do that to you.

If we removed every single asylum seeker from our shores, the risk to that teenage girl barely changes. Women’s’ right to walk safely in a park hasn’t been enforced or even cared much about by a lot of people for centuries, I wonder why it is only when asylum seekers commit these crimes we suddenly care?

It isn’t gaslighting to say that all humans deserve basic human rights. It is gaslighting to weaponise safety of women and girls when targeting only one group, yet all the while pretending we can’t see and hear you doing it.

BoredZelda · 21/08/2026 14:16

EasternStandard · 21/08/2026 14:13

You don’t think accommodation, healthcare, heating, transport and food is provided?

I think they have the same access to these things as any other person who lives in, or visits the U.K. The only difference is, we forbid them to have any way to work and pay for these things themselves. It’s not a benefit, it is a basic right.

EasternStandard · 21/08/2026 14:16

BoredZelda · 21/08/2026 14:14

If you are for human rights for one, you are for human rights for all. None of those rights are contradictory. If a government decides it can lock up one group of people without any crime being committed, you are relying on that government never to do that to you.

If we removed every single asylum seeker from our shores, the risk to that teenage girl barely changes. Women’s’ right to walk safely in a park hasn’t been enforced or even cared much about by a lot of people for centuries, I wonder why it is only when asylum seekers commit these crimes we suddenly care?

It isn’t gaslighting to say that all humans deserve basic human rights. It is gaslighting to weaponise safety of women and girls when targeting only one group, yet all the while pretending we can’t see and hear you doing it.

Ok so the rape of the elderly man, the Brighton rape, the Belfast attack, Rhiannon Whyte’s sad death, is what you’ll accept?

ChippySeagulls · 21/08/2026 14:16

BoredZelda · 21/08/2026 14:07

None of those are given to asylum seekers either.

They are in my area (Lancashire)!!

Plus an 'allowance', access to food banks and passes for the council gym/pool.

JuliettaCaeser · 21/08/2026 14:16

Having visited Cairo as a young woman and experienced the worst grimmest harassment ever just walking down the street in broad daylight modestly dressed no I would not want a large group of men from that culture in my area. It was next level. What shocked us was it was most of the men not just a dodgy few.

Brittany21 · 21/08/2026 14:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

CheeseCakeSunflowers · 21/08/2026 14:20

If you read the details of the Piddington campaign its about the lack of local consultation on this. No-one from the government has made any attempt to inform local people about what is happening. Considering Andy Burnham is on a listening tour of the country its a shame he has not responded to any of the invitations to speak with local people.

cornflakecrunchie · 21/08/2026 14:21

Send them home.
Probably not politically acceptable to say that nowadays though. Can't say a damn thing, just have to put up with our country being taken over, without even a bullet fired in anger! It's a bloody joke.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 21/08/2026 14:21

LakieLady · 21/08/2026 13:38

No-one can say with any certainty whether someone has a right to asylum or not until their asylum application has been determined.

There is a whole industry of solicitors/lawyers ensuring we cannot get these people back out of the country once they’ve come. Even the ones who have committed crimes! We end up stuck with them. I have no faith in any of the current systems that govern this.

Lifeomars · 21/08/2026 14:22

I live in a poor innner city, for decades we are home . to the following:

2 bail hostels
The Police custody suite
A significant amount of supported housing for people with complex needs drug, alcohol, and mental health issues The charity that runs all this housing has over 50% of its property round here despite being a county wide service.

It feels as if we are used as a dumping ground and there are consequences, for example the two local parks are full of drinkers and people under the influence of drugs, there is a lot of begging outside the local supermarket and i would never go there after dark.

The people who make these planning decisions never live in these areas and do not consider the impact on existing residents. It creates an imblance in an area where there are a significant amount of people living there who have particular needs.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 21/08/2026 14:22

cornflakecrunchie · 21/08/2026 14:21

Send them home.
Probably not politically acceptable to say that nowadays though. Can't say a damn thing, just have to put up with our country being taken over, without even a bullet fired in anger! It's a bloody joke.

Stop trying to be politically correct. Those days are looooong gone. Just accept the slurs and carry on with common sense opinions.

TemperanceWest · 21/08/2026 14:24

cornflakecrunchie · 21/08/2026 14:21

Send them home.
Probably not politically acceptable to say that nowadays though. Can't say a damn thing, just have to put up with our country being taken over, without even a bullet fired in anger! It's a bloody joke.

Who is taking over the country?

TeenLifeMum · 21/08/2026 14:25

Paganpentacle · 21/08/2026 11:55

I don't live anywhere near there and I totally understand the concern.
1200 men who need a leaflet telling them its not OK to rape wandering around a very small village with fuck all amenities?
Nope.

Edited

Maybe they could give that leaflet to British white men too as many of them could do with the clarification! My rapist was a ginger white army officer.

Swipe left for the next trending thread