Thanks for coming along to mansplain what we think, mate. Your points are disingenuous at best: breathtakingly assumptive/libellous at worst.
Just a few points;
Those people gloating about people drowning are m*rons.
The teenage boy did well.
Many Ukrainians came in as families, fleeing from war.
It is nothing to do with what people look like. Don’t pretend.
It is nothing to do with different life stories… unless that life story happens to include ‘treating women badly as it’s my culture’, or crime. That is one key point – we don’t know.
No one means there aren’t some genuine asylum seekers. I’d be happy to see most of the women in Afghanistan over here as them, for instance.
However strangely it just seems to be Afghan men appearing: what are they fleeing from, the oppression of women?
And why do they all flood here instead of one of the many countries en route?
No one is against legal immigration. (Some) people from other places are welcome… IF they integrate and respect British values.
You say we shouldn’t prejudge asylum seekers, yet you are prejudging those protesting outside hotels.
You reply to our point about not wanting all fighting age men from medieval cultures here by telling us you know a man from a European culture and an African woman here.
The coverage of ‘small boats’/mega dinghys shows only men. The news reports on any who have died on the crossing are generally about women though…
And last but not least, from the government website about one of the three planned asylum centres (talking about 1200 males);
6. Who would reside at this site?
If deemed suitable, the site would accommodate single adult males between the ages of 18 and 65 who have applied for asylum. … The majority of illegal migrants claiming asylum in the UK are single adult males.